期刊文献+

丙泊酚单用与联合芬太尼用于无痛人流术中麻醉的效果对比 被引量:24

Comparison of Anesthetic Effects of Single Propofol and Propofol Combined Fentanyl for Painless Induced Abortion
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的比较丙泊酚单用与联合芬太尼在无痛人流术中麻醉的效果。方法选择医院2011年1月到2012年6月行人工流产术的早孕妇女681例,分为两组,对照组325例,观察组356例。对照组患者均缓慢静脉注射丙泊酚注射液2.5 mg/kg,观察组患者先给予枸橼酸芬太尼注射液1μg/kg静脉滴注,再静脉注射丙泊酚注射液1.5 mg/kg。观察两组患者镇痛效果、术毕苏醒时间、麻醉效果以及不良反应。结果对照组镇痛总有效率为80.31%,明显低于观察组的100.00%(P<0.05);对照组术毕苏醒时间为(6.8±2.2)min,明显长于观察组的(5.4±2.1)min(P<0.05);对照组丙泊酚用量为(2.92±0.81)mg/kg,显著多于观察组的(2.22±0.42)mg/kg(P<0.05);对照组麻醉总有效率为92.62%,明显低于观察组的100.00%(P<0.05)。对照组6例患者出现轻微恶心、呕吐,观察组3例患者出现轻微恶心、呕吐等不良反应。结论丙泊酚联合芬太尼用于无痛人流术的麻醉及镇痛效果好,安全可靠,值得临床推广。 Objective To compare the anesthetic effect of single propofol and propofol combined fentanyl for painless induced abor- tion. Methods Six hundred and eighty- one early pregnant women undergoing artificial abortion in our hospital from January 2011 to June 2012 were selected and divided into two groups. The control group (325 cases) was given Propofol Injection 2.5 mg/kg by slow intravenous injection. The observation group (356 cases) was firstly given Fentanyl Citrate Injection 1 p^g/kg by intravenous drip,then Propofol Injection 1.5 mg/kg by intravenous injection. The effects of analgesia and anesthesia,postoperative awakening time and adverse reactions were observed in the two groups. Results The total effective rate of analgesia in the control group was significantly lower than that in the observation group(80.31% vs. 100.00%, P 〈 0.05);the postoperative awakening time in the control group was signif- icantly longer than that in the observation group [(6.8±2.2)min vs. (5.4±2. 1)rain, P 〈 0.05];the propofol dosage in the control group was significantly more than that in the observation group [ (2.92 ± 0. 81 )mg/kg vs. (2. 22 ± 0.42)mg/kg, P 〈 0.05];the anes- thetic total effective rate in the control group was significantly lower than that in the observation group (92.62% vs. 100. 00%, P 〈 0.05). There were 6 cases of mild nausea and vomiting in the control group,while only 3 cases in the observation group. Conclusion Propo- fol combined fentanyl had the good analgesic and anesthetic effect in painless induced abortion, which is safe, reliable and worthy of being clinically promoted.
作者 张涛 陈斌
出处 《中国药业》 CAS 2013年第8期48-49,共2页 China Pharmaceuticals
关键词 丙泊酚 芬太尼 无痛人流术 麻醉效果 propofol fentanyl painless induced abortion anesthetic effect
  • 相关文献

参考文献7

二级参考文献18

  • 1许莹,褚国强,薛向宁,姚新峰.不同丙泊酚复合用药方法对人流手术应激的影响[J].临床麻醉学杂志,2005,21(4):249-251. 被引量:77
  • 2Bailey PL,Streisand JB,East KA,et al.Differences in magnitude and duration of opioid-induced respiratory depression and anaigesia with fentanyl and sufentanil[J].Anesth Analg,1990,70(1):8.
  • 3Searle NR,Sahab P.Propofol in patients with cardiac disease[J].Can J Anaesth,1993,40:730-747.
  • 4王伟鹏,李立环.临床麻醉学[M].4版.北京:人民卫生出版社,2004:298-299.
  • 5Rognas LK,Elkjaer P.Anaesthesia in day case laparoscoscopic female sterilization:a comparision of two aneasthetic methods[J].Acta Anaesthesiol Scand,2004,48:899-902.
  • 6Taylor IN,Kenny GNC,Glen JB.Pharmacodynamic stability of a mixture of propofol and alfentannil[J].Br J Aneasth,1992,69:168-171.
  • 7ABrellano RJ,Pole ML,Rafuse SE,et al.Omissin of nitrous oxide from a propofol-based anesthetic does not affect the recovery of women undergoing outpatient gynecologic surger[J].Anesthesi-ology,2002,93(2):332.
  • 8Thomson IR,Harding G,Hudson RJ.A comparison of fentanyl and sufentanil in patients undergoing coronary bypass graft surgery[J].J Cantionthorac Vasc Anesth,2000;14(6):652~656.
  • 9葛明,刘济媛,郎秋英,孙恺,明智,张云英.小剂量氯胺酮静脉麻醉用于人工流产术250例临床观察[J].中国实用妇科与产科杂志,1998,14(2):109-109. 被引量:50
  • 10金昔陆,池志强.μ阿片受体激动剂舒芬太尼的药理作用和应用[J].中国现代应用药学,1999,16(1):1-5. 被引量:244

共引文献292

同被引文献125

引证文献24

二级引证文献87

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部