期刊文献+

基于作者引用与合作关系的学术影响力测度研究进展 被引量:32

Literature Review of Academic Impact Measurement for Authors Based on Both Co-authorship and Citation Relationship
原文传递
导出
摘要 在科研合作日益显著的趋势下,基于作者合作的学术影响力测度研究明显分为两方面:一是用合作这一因素对传统的引用影响力指标进行调整;二是直接测度作者在合作网络中的影响力,并探索与引用影响力指标的相关性。结果表明,作者在合作网络中的中心度指标与其被引次数、h指数、g指数均呈正相关。在科研合作的背景下,要综合评价作者的学术影响力,应将两者结合起来。最后从科学交流模式和作者学术关系的视角,讨论双重测度作者学术影响力的理论依据。 The trend of scientific research cooperation has become increasingly significant, whieh leads to the discussions about the academic impact measurement based on co-authorship. These studies include two main aspects, one is to adjust traditional citation impact indexes to co-authorship; the other is to measure authors impact in co-authorship network, and explore the correlation with citation impact indexes. The results show that there is the positive correlation between the network centrality index of authors and its cited index, and h index, and g index. It is necessary to combine them to comprehensively assess the academic impact of authors in the environment of scientific research cooperation. Finally, this paper investigates the theoretical basis for a double measurement of academic impact from the perspectives of scientific communication and academic relationship between authors.
出处 《图书情报工作》 CSSCI 北大核心 2013年第8期135-140,共6页 Library and Information Service
基金 中央级公益性科研院所基本科研业务费专项课题"基于作者合作与引用关系的学术影响力研究"(课题编号:12R0123)研究成果之一
关键词 作者合作关系 作者引用关系 合作影响力 引用影响力 科学交流 co-authorship citation collaboration impact citation impact scientific communication
  • 相关文献

参考文献39

  • 1hmnnidis J P A. Measuring co-authorship and networking-adjusted scientific impact[Jl. PLoS ONE ,2008, 3(7) : e2778.
  • 2Qiu J. Publish or perish in China[J]. Nature,2010,463(7278) : 142 - 143.
  • 3杜建,张玢,李阳.我国医学领域不同学科作者合作度与论文影响力的关系[J].中华医学图书情报杂志,2012,21(3):18-23. 被引量:50
  • 4Hirsch J E. An index to quantify an individual' s scientific research output[ J ]. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America,2005, 102(46) : 16569 - 16572.
  • 5杜建,张玢.作者合作视角下的h指数计量方法:比较与归纳[J].图书情报工作,2011,55(24):52-55. 被引量:18
  • 6Du Jim:, Tm:g Xiaoli. Perceptinns of author order vs. coutribution among re,archers with different professional ranks m:(t the potential of hm'monic counts fi)r encouraging ethical co-authorship practices [ J ]. Scientometrics, 2013. DOI 10. 1007/s11192 -012 -05:5 -4.
  • 7Hu Xiaojun, Rousseau R, Chen Jin. In those fields where multiple auttlorship is the rule, the h-index should be supplemented by role -based h -indices [ J ] Journal of Information Science, 2010,36 (I) :73 -85.
  • 8Hagen N T. Harmonic allocation of authorship credit: source-level correction of bibliometric bias assures accurate publication and citation analysis [ J ]. PLoS ON E,2008,3 ( 12 ) : e4021.
  • 9Hagen N T. Harmonic publication and citation counting: Sharing authorship credit equitably -not equally, geometrically arlthmatically[ J]. Scientometfies,2010, 84(3) :785 -793.
  • 10Hodge S E, Greenberg D A. Publication credit [ J ]. Science, 1981,213(4511 ) :950.

二级参考文献74

  • 1高凡,徐引篪.图书馆联盟的社会网络资源配置[J].中国图书馆学报,2006,32(3):14-16. 被引量:37
  • 2中华医学会眼科学分会关于加强学术道德行为规范建设的规定(试行)[J].中华眼科杂志,2006,42(6):506-506. 被引量:2
  • 3SHADISH W R, TOLLIVER D, GRAY M, et al. Author judg- ments about works they cite--three studies from psychology journals [ J]. Social Studies of Science, 1995, 25 (3): 477-498.
  • 4CASE D O, HIGGINS G M. How can we investigate citation be- havior? a study of reasons for citing literature in communication [J].Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 2000, 51 (7): 635-645.
  • 5TANG Rong, SAFER M A. Author-rated importance of cited ref- erences in biology and psychology publications [J].Journal of Documentation. 2008, 64 (2): 246-272.
  • 6RONALD W D. Continuity and discontinuity of collaboration be- havior since 1800-from a bibliometric point of view [ J]. Scientometrics, 2001, 52 (3): 503 -517.
  • 7蔡明月 周淑珍.台湾地区生命科学作者之引用研究.教育资料与图书馆学,:503-529.
  • 8LEVITT J M, MIKE T. Citation levels and collaboration within library and information science [ J ]. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 2009, 60 ( 3 ).
  • 9WHITE H D. Authors as citers over time [ J]. Journal of the A- merican Society for Information Science and Technology Archive, 2001, 52 (2): 87-108.
  • 10Wuchty S, Jones B F, Uzzi B. The increasing dominance of teams in production of knowledge. Science,2007, 316 (5827) : 1036 - 1039.

共引文献91

同被引文献560

引证文献32

二级引证文献201

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部