期刊文献+

CT平扫在急、慢性阑尾炎中的诊断价值 被引量:1

Value of Plain CT Scanning in the Diagnosis of Acute and Chronic Appendicitis
下载PDF
导出
摘要 【目的】探讨CT平扫在急、慢性阑尾炎中的诊断价值。【方法】回顾性分析28例临床可疑急、慢性阑尾炎并经CT平扫检查患者资料,分析其诊断准确率、特异性与敏感性等。【结果]CT检查示28例患者中有24例诊断为急、慢性阑尾炎,与病理对照漏诊4例急性阑尾炎,误诊2例,其中1例附件囊肿cT诊断为阑尾脓肿,1例小肠管壁增粗CT诊断为急性阑尾炎,敏感性为85%(22/26),特异性为50%(1/z),准确性为82%(23/28),阳性预测值为92%(22/24),阴性预测值为25%(1/4)。CT平扫分级与病理分级Kappa:0.0625。【结论】CT平扫诊断急、慢性阑尾炎敏感性、准确性较好,特异性及阴性预测值较低,提示CT平扫对于发现急、慢性阑尾炎是一种较好的手段,但对于急、慢性阑尾炎分级作用较差。 [Objective] To explore the value of plain CT scanning in the diagnosis ot acute and chronic ap- pendicitis. [Methods] The data of plain CT scanning of 28 patients with clinically suspected acute and chronic appendicitis were analyzed retrospectively. The diagnostic accuracy, sensitivity and specificity were analyzed. [Results] CT scanning showed that 24 patients of 28 patients were diagnosed as acute and chronic appendici- tis. Compared with the pathological examination, the diagnosis of 4 patients with acute appendicitis was missed, and 2 patients were misdiagnosed. One patient with adnexal cyst was diagnosed as appendiceal abscess by CT. One patient with enlargement of intestinal canal wall was diagnosed as acute appendicitis by CT. The sensitivity, specificity and accuracy were 85%(22/26), 50% (1/2) and 82~//00 (23/28), respectively. The posi- tive and negative predictive value were 92 % (22/24) and 25 ~ (1/4), respectively. The Kappa value between plain CT and pathology grading was 0. 0625. [Conclusion]Plain CT scanning is highly accurate and sensitive in diagnosing acute and chronic appendicitis. The specificity and negative predictive value are lower. It indicates that plain CT scanning is a better way to diagnose acute and chronic appendicitis. Plain CT scanning is not much good for the grading of acute and chronic appendicitis.
出处 《医学临床研究》 CAS 2013年第4期657-659,共3页 Journal of Clinical Research
关键词 阑尾炎 放射摄影术 体层摄影术 X线计算机 Appendicitis/RA Tomography, X-Ray Computed
  • 相关文献

参考文献16

  • 1Hershko DD,Scroka G,Bahouth H, el al . The role of selec- tive computed tomography in the diagnosis and management of suspected acute appendicitis[J].Am Surg , 2002,68 (11 ): 1003-1007.
  • 2Pickhardt PJ, Levy AD, Rohrmann CA, et al . Primary neo- plasms of the appendix manifesting as acute appendicitis: CT findings with pathologic comparison[J]. Radiology , 2002, 224(3):775 781.
  • 3肖立俊,顾建平,黄桂余.误诊为急性阑尾炎42例分析[J].中国普通外科杂志,2000,9(6):573-574. 被引量:43
  • 4Peck J,Peck A,Peck Cy et al . The clinical role of noncontrasthelical computed tomography in the diagnosis of acute appen-dicitis[J], Am J Surg,2000,180(2): 133-136.
  • 5Hill BC. Johnson SC, Owens EK,et al . CT scan for suspectedacute abdominal process: impact of combinations of IV,oral,and rectal contrast[J]. World J Surg ,2010,34(4) :699-703.
  • 6Victoria T.Mahboubi S. Normal appendiceal diameter in chil-dren :does choice of CT oral contrast(Volumen versus gastro-grafin)make a difference[J]. Emerg Radiol,2010,17(5):397-401.
  • 7Charoensak A,Pongpornsup S,Suthikeeree W. Wall thicknessand outer diameter of the normal appendix in adults using 64slices multidetector CT [J]. J Med Assoc Thai,2010,93(12):1437-1442.
  • 8戚乐,戴平丰,丁建平,向军益.阑尾腔内气体MDCT征象诊断阑尾炎的价值[J].临床放射学杂志,2010,29(6):787-789. 被引量:37
  • 9王廷昱,王善军,张文奇,张淑平.急性阑尾炎的多层螺旋CT表现与病理对照[J].医学影像学杂志,2011,21(9):1378-1381. 被引量:15
  • 10戚乐,戴平丰,丁建平,向军益.阑尾炎的MDCT诊断误区[J].临床放射学杂志,2011,30(7):1062-1064. 被引量:21

二级参考文献26

  • 1张国良,陈九如.CT在急性阑尾炎诊断中的应用[J].国外医学(临床放射学分册),2004,27(4):227-230. 被引量:33
  • 2王康,赵泽华,王之,张国桢,王伟忠,徐嵩森,张淼,刘文瑾,奉典旭.应用多层螺旋CT多方位重建技术诊断急性阑尾炎的价值[J].中华放射学杂志,2005,39(2):177-180. 被引量:127
  • 3陈英敏,张云亭,李宝山,刘连祥,孙吉林.多层螺旋CT多平面重组(MPR)技术在正常阑尾显示中的应用价值[J].临床放射学杂志,2007,26(8):821-824. 被引量:17
  • 4Hershko DD, Sroka G, BahOUth H, et al. The role of solec- tive computed tornography in the diagnosis and management of suspected acute appendicitis [J]. Am Stag, 2002, 68: 1003- 1007.
  • 5王华.疑诊阑尾炎.新英格兰医学杂志文摘,2000,.
  • 6Malone AJ Jr, Wolf CR, Maimed AS, et al. Diagnosis of a- cute appendicitis: value of Unenhanced CT[J].AJR, 1993, 160: 763-766.
  • 7Piekhardt P J, Levy AD, Rohrmann CA, et al. Primary neo- plasms of the appendix manifesting as acute appendicitis: CT findings withpathologic comparison [J]. Radiology, 2002, 224: 775-781.
  • 8Hershko DD, Awad N, Fischer D, et al. Focused helical CTusing rectal contraat material only as the preffered technique for the diagnosis of suspected acute appendicitis: prospective, Randomized, controlled study comparing three different tech- niques [J]. Dis Colon Rectum, 2007, 50:1223-1229.
  • 9Ran PM, Rhea JT, Novelline RA. Sensitivity and specificity of the individual CT signs of appendicitis: eaperienee with 200 helical appendiceal CT examinations [J]. J Camput Asist To-mogr, 1997, 21: 686-692.
  • 10Rothroek SG, Green SM, Dobson M, et al. Misdiagnosis of appendicitis in nonpregnant women of childbearing agelJl[J]. Emerg Med, 1995, 13: 1-8.

共引文献123

同被引文献14

引证文献1

二级引证文献9

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部