期刊文献+

关于信息社会安全理论发展的几点思考——甬温线动车事故的启示 被引量:7

New Perspective on Safety Theory Development in Information Society:Inspiration from Yongwen Line Train Collision in China
下载PDF
导出
摘要 随着社会发展逐步进入信息社会阶段,安全生产活动中涉及的主、客体以及二者的关系已经发生了明显变化。产生于工业社会阶段的安全理论已开始被质疑能否适用于当前发生的安全事故。结合甬温线动车事故的致因分析,详细分析信息社会下安全生产活动所发生的改变,并提出关于安全理论发展研究的2个思考:一是将人工智能纳入到安全生产活动主体,在原轨迹交叉事故致因理论模型的基础上进行调整;二是强调信息社会风险理论的创新,从自反性危机和承灾体脆弱性分析2个方面提出探索信息社会背景下安全理论研究的新视角。经分析得出如下结论:社会发展伴随着新的危机;在信息社会阶段,信息系统的不安全运行成为事故的重要致因;信息社会安全理论研究亟待创新。 Human society has entered into the stage of Information society. Many significant changes has taken place in safety production activities. So far, almost all the safety theories applied were formed in industrial society, whose applicability began to be questioned in new era. Combining causal analysis on Wenzhou train collision, changes of safety production activities in information society were analyzed in detail. And then two new ideas on the development of safety theory were raised. Firstly, artificial intelli- gence was incorporated into safety production system and the original track-cross accident causal model was modified. Secondly, the innovation in risk theory in information society was emphasized on two new per- spectives which were reflexive crisis and vulnerability analysis. Based on the analysis, the main conclu- sions are as followed:the new crises are always accompanied with the social development. The fault of information system would be the important accident causation. Safety theory should be brought forth new ideas in information society.
出处 《中国安全科学学报》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2013年第3期140-144,共5页 China Safety Science Journal
关键词 信息社会 甬温动车事故 事故致因 轨迹交叉论 自反性危机 反身性思考 脆弱性分析 information society Yongwen line train collision accident causation track-cross theory reflexive crisis reflexive thinking vulnerability analysis
  • 相关文献

参考文献10

二级参考文献49

共引文献56

同被引文献75

  • 1JoséALEXANDRE,T.G.FREGNANI,Bento S.DE MATTOS,JoséA.HERNANDES.An innovative approach for integrated airline network and aircraft family optimization[J].Chinese Journal of Aeronautics,2020,33(2):634-663. 被引量:2
  • 2秦志希,郭小平.论“风险社会”危机的跨文化传播[J].国际新闻界,2006,28(3):16-19. 被引量:26
  • 3Jamshidi M. System of systems engineering: Innovations for the 218t century[M]. New York: John Wiley & Sons, 2009:2.
  • 4Perrow C. Normal accidents: Living with high-risk technologies[M]. New York: Basic Books, 1984:39 -49.
  • 5Pidgeon N. In retrospect: Normal aecidents[J]. Nature, 2011, 477 (7365) : 404 -405.
  • 6Redmond P J. A system of systems interface hazard analysis technique [D]. Monterey, CA: Naval Postgraduate School, 2007.
  • 7Henshaw M, Siemieniuch C, Sinclair M, et al. System of systems engineering: A research imperative[C]. 2013 Interna- tional Conference on System Science and Engineering (ICSSE), 2013:389- 394.
  • 8Kaaniche M, Kanoun K, Rabah M. A preliminary framework for SoS dependability modelling and evaluation[ R]. New- castle University, 2001.
  • 9Despotou G, Alexander R, Kelly T. Addressing challenges of hazard analysis in systems of systems[C]. Proceedings of 3ra Annual Systems Conference, 2009:167 -172.
  • 10Alexander R, Kelly T. Supporting system of systems hazard analysis using muhi-agent simulation[J]. Safety Science, 2013, 51(1): 302-318.

引证文献7

二级引证文献64

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部