摘要
目的:评价液基细胞学技术与传统细胞学涂片在检测宫颈鳞状细胞病变的差异。方法:回顾性分析2010~2012年特克斯县人民医院1 800例宫颈细胞学检查结果,其中传统细胞学涂片1 150例,液基细胞学涂片650例,分别对两种方法的宫颈病变阳性检出率进行比较,看有无差异。结果:液基细胞学组的标本满意率明显高于传统细胞学组(P<0.05),宫颈病变检出率液基细胞学组明显高于传统细胞学组(P<0.05)。结论:液基细胞学技术对于宫颈病变的诊断有较高价值。
Objective: To evaluate the liquid base cytology technology and traditional cytological smear in detecting cervical squamous cell lesion differences. Methods:Retrospective analysis of 2010 ~ 2012 turks county people hospital 1 800 cases of cervical cytology examination results,with 1 150 eases of traditional cytological smear,liquid base cytological smear 650 cases respectively, the two methods of cervical lesions positive detection rate comparison, look at the difference between. Results: Liquid base cell I specimens satisfaction rate is obviously higher than that of the traditional cell committee (P 〈 0.05 ), cervical lesion detection rate liquid base cell is obviously higher than that of the traditional 1,1 cells ( P 〈 0. 05 ). Conclusion: Liquid based cytology technology for the diagnosis of cervical lesions had a higher value.
出处
《农垦医学》
2012年第6期495-497,共3页
Journal of Nongken Medicine
关键词
液基细胞学技术
传统细胞学涂片
宫颈鳞状细胞
Liquid base cytology technology
Traditional cytological smear
Cervical squamous cell