期刊文献+

中日韩贸易结构的变迁及影响因素分析 被引量:2

The Analysis of Changing Pattern of Trade Structures in China,Japan and South Korea
下载PDF
导出
摘要 文章通过测算1962—2010年中日韩三大类产品的贸易特化系数得出:中日韩三国的贸易结构升级呈现出明显的阶段性和"赶超",贸易竞争力按初级产品→一般产品→机械类产品的路径变化。韩国和中国的贸易结构升级较快,呈现向日本贸易结构收敛的明显趋势,这表明日韩、日中的贸易竞争性在增强,但日本"头雁"的领先地位并未改变。三国贸易结构的演变受内部和外部因素影响,其中,国际投资和国际贸易在国家间技术和资金传递上有重要作用。 By calculating Trade Specialization Coefficient of three categories from 1962 to 2010 in China,Japan and South Korea,this paper shows the changing path of trade structures in these 3 countries.(1)The changing pattern of trade advantage follows the upgrading path primary products-general products-mechanical products.(2)The trade structure upgrading of South Korea and China is faster and more complicated than Japan,and the convergence trend and Catching-up to Japan is very obvious.This means more competitive than complementary trade structure among China,Japan and South Korea.(3)Japan is and will still be the leading-goose in East Asia at least in over 20 years.The evolution of trade structure is determined by both internal and external factors,the primary one of which is RD and innovation.Foreign investment and trade also play an very important role in "passing on" capital and technology to drive trade structure upgrading.
作者 何敏 田维明
出处 《兰州学刊》 CSSCI 2012年第11期110-116,共7页
基金 国家自然科学基金资助项目。(项目编号:70973122)
关键词 贸易结构演变 贸易特化系数 中日韩 雁行模式 trade structure evolution trade specialization coefficient east asia flying-geese pattern
  • 相关文献

参考文献14

二级参考文献48

  • 1车维汉."雁行形态"理论及实证研究综述[J].经济学动态,2004(11):102-106. 被引量:21
  • 2盛晓白.中日经济关系的转折点[J].现代日本经济,2005,24(1):7-11. 被引量:6
  • 3李晓.论日本在东亚经济发展中的地位与作用[J].世界经济,1995,18(1):59-66. 被引量:3
  • 4白成琦.论日本对东亚直接投资的新阶段[J].世界经济,1996,19(3):52-55. 被引量:4
  • 5[1]Bhagwati, J. and V. Dehejia, 1994, "Free Trade and Wages of the Unskilled: Is Marx Striking Again," in Bhagwati, J. and M. Kosters, (eds), Trade and Wages, Washington, D.C.: American Enterprise Institute,pp. 36-75.
  • 6[2]Finger, J.M. and M.E. Kreinin, 1979, "A Measure of′Export Similarity′ and Its Possible Uses," The Economic Journal, 89, pp. 905-912.
  • 7[3]Glick, Reuven and Andrew K. Rose, 1998, "Contagion and Trade: Why Are Currency Crises Regional?" 13.感谢Stephen Parker为我们指出了这一点.NBER Working Paper, 6806.
  • 8[4]Grubel, H.G. and P.J. Lloyd, 1971, "The Empirical Measurement of Intra-Industry Trade," The Economic Record, 47, pp. 494-517.
  • 9[5]Kellman, M. and T. Schroder, 1983, "The Export Similarity Index: Some Structural Tests," The Economic Journal, 93, pp. 193-198.
  • 10[6]Knetter, M. M. and M.J. Slaughter, 1999, "Measuring Product-Market Integration," NBER Working Paper,6969.

共引文献955

同被引文献21

引证文献2

二级引证文献34

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部