期刊文献+

完全腹腔镜腹主-双股动脉人工血管旁路术的临床应用 被引量:1

Total laparoscopic aortobifemoral bypass
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的探讨完全腹腔镜腹主-双股动脉人工血管旁路术的可行性和安全性。方法 2011年5月收治1例主髂动脉闭塞患者,行完全腹腔镜腹主动脉-双股动脉人工血管旁路术。患者耻骨上方做切口,置入10mm Trocar建立气腹与腹腔镜通道,左右腹直肌外缘置入1个12mm Trocar和1个5mm Trocar,导入操作器械。左肋缘下另置入1个5mm Trocar,导入把持钳。采用"围裙"技术隔离小肠。游离腹主动脉。在肠系膜下动脉下方阻断腹主动脉,行人工血管-腹主动脉端侧吻合。吻合成功后,将人工血管分支经皮下隧道引出至双侧腹股沟切口。开放手术行人工血管-双股动脉端侧吻合。结果手术时间450min,腹腔镜下血管吻合时间70min。术中失血量约650ml。随访14个月,人工血管通畅。结论完全腹腔镜腹主-双股动脉人工血管旁路术是安全、可行的。 Objective To study the feasibility and safety of total laparoscopic aortobifemoral bypass. Methods May 2011, the patient diagnosed as aortoiliac occlusion was performed total laparoscopiclaortobifemora bypass. One 10mm Trocar for laparoscope was located above the pubic symphysis. One 12mm Trocar and one 5mm troca was placed at external edge of the right and left rectus. One 5mm troca was located at the left costal marginfor grasper.The bowel was isolated with apron technique. The abdominal aortic artery was diveded and clampped under the inferior mesenteric artery . The graft-aorto end-to-side laparoscopic anastomosis was performed with running suture. The prosthesis was led through the subcutaneous tunnel to the right and left groin incision. Prosthesis was sutured to the femoral artery end-to-side with open surgery technique. Results The operative time was 450 minutes. The laparoscopical anastomosis time was 70 minutes. Blood loss was 650ml. Prosthesis was patent and no complication were found within 14 months after operation. Conclusions Total laparoscopic aortobifemoral bypass is feasible and safety.
出处 《中华腔镜外科杂志(电子版)》 2012年第6期1-3,共3页 Chinese Journal of Laparoscopic Surgery(Electronic Edition)
关键词 腹腔镜 血管手术 人工血管 旁路术 Laparoscopic Vascular surgery Prosthesis Bypass
  • 相关文献

参考文献2

二级参考文献19

  • 1何菊,汪忠镐.腹腔镜辅助下的腹主动脉瘤手术与传统手术的对比[J].中华普通外科杂志,2006,21(2):156-158. 被引量:1
  • 2Dion YM, Gracia CR, Ben E1 Kadi HH. Totally laparoscopic abdominal aortic aneurysm repair. J Vasc Surg, 2001, 33 ( 1 ) : 181 - 185.
  • 3Hallin A, Bergqvist D, Holmberg L. Literature review of surgical management of abdominal aortic aneurysm. Eur J Vasc Endovase Surg, 2001, 22(3) :197 -204.
  • 4Blankensteijn JD, de Jong SE, Prinssen M, et al. Dutch Randomized Endovascular Aneurysm Management(DREAM) Trial Group : Two-year outcomes after conventional or endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm. N Engl J Med, 2005, 352 (23) :2398 - 2405.
  • 5EVAR trial participants. Endovascular aneurysm repair versus open repair in patients with abdominal aortic aneurysm ( EVAR trial 1 ) : randomized controlled trial. Lancet, 2005, 365 ( 9478 ) : 2179 - 2186.
  • 6Ferrari M, Adami D, Del Corso A, et al. Laparoscopy-assisted abdominal aortic aneurysm repair: early and middle-term results of a consecutive series of 122 cases. J Vasc Surg,2006,43 (4) :695 - 700.
  • 7Kolvenbach R, Puerschel A, Fajer S, et al. Total laparoscopic aortic surgery versus minimal access techniques: review of more than 600 patients. Vascular,2006,14(4) :186 -192.
  • 8Coggia M, Di Centa I, Javerliat I, et al. Total laparoscopic abdominal aortic aneurysms repair. J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino), 2005. 46(4) :407 -414.
  • 9Jansen SJ,Ducke W,Hartley DEet al.A laparoscopic endovascular aortobifemoral conduit that can be retained as a long-term bypass:asolution for patients with inadequate iliac access. Journal of Endovascular Therapy . 2009
  • 10Fourneau I,Mari?n I,Remy Pet al.Conversion during laparoscopic aortobifemoral bypass:a failure?. European Journal of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery . 2010

共引文献3

同被引文献16

  • 1Chiu KWH, Davies RSM, Nightingale PG, et al. Review of direct anatomical open surgical management of atherosclerotic aorto-iliac occlusive disease. EurJ Vasc Endovasc Surg,2010,39:460-471.
  • 2Pfaff MJ, Indes J, Sosa J,et al. A meta-anlysis of the outcomes of 8, 550 patients comparing open surgical and endovascular treatment for aorto-iliac occlusive disease. J Vasc Surg,2011,53 :57-58.
  • 3Dion YM, Gracia CR. A new technique for laparoscopic aortob- ifemoral grafting in occlusice aortoiliac disease. J Vasc Surg, 1997,26:685-692.
  • 4Dion YM, Katkhouda N, Rouleau C, et al. Laparoscop-assisted aorto-bifemoral bypass. Surg Laparosc Endosc, 1993,3:425-429.
  • 5Fourneau I, Sabbe T, Daenens K, et al. Hand-assisted laparosco- py versus conventional median laparotomy for aortobifemoral by- pass for severe aorto-iliac occlusive disease : a prospective random- ised study. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg,2006 ,32 ,645-650.
  • 6Lee TS, Kim HH, Han HS, et al. Early experiences of laparo- scopic aortofemoral bypass in Korea-report from a single center. Ann Vasc Dis,2009,2:34-39.
  • 7Gracia GR, Dion YM. Technological advances in laparoscopic aorto-occlusive surgery. Semin Laparosc Surg, 1999,6 .. 164-174.
  • 8Fournean I, MariEn I, Remy P, et al. Conversion during laparo- seopic aortobifemoral bypass: a failure? Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg,2010,39 : 239-245.
  • 9Tick J, RemyP, Sabbe T, et al. Laparoseopic versus open ap- proach for aortobifemoral bypass for severe aorto-iliac occlusive disease-a multicentre randomised controlled trial. Eur J Vasc En- dovasc Surg,2012,43:711-715.
  • 10Di C, Coggia M, Cerceau P, et al. Total laparoscopic aortobifemoral bypass : short and middle term results. Ann Vasc Surg, 2008,22 : 227-232.

引证文献1

二级引证文献3

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部