期刊文献+

伊立替康与拓扑替康单药治疗老年小细胞肺癌临床分析 被引量:2

Effect of irinotecan and topotecan on old small cell lung cancer
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:探讨伊立替康(CPT-11)和拓扑替康(TPT)治疗老年小细胞肺癌的疗效及不良反应是否有差别。方法:回顾性分析156例经病理确诊的老年小细胞肺癌,其中CPT-11组88人,TPT组68人;比较两组的疗效及反应。结果:两组之间在近期疗效和远期疗效上均无统计学差异(P>0.05);TPT组白细胞减少高于CPT-11组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);而在延迟性腹泻中,CPT-11组高于TPT组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);在贫血、血小板减少、恶心呕吐及肝功能异常中,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论:CPT-11组及TPT组化疗的近期、远期疗效相似,血液毒性反应中,CPT-11组优于TPT组;肠道反应中,TPT组优于CPT-11组。 Objective: To explore the curative effect and side effects of CPT-11 and TPT treatment on small cell lung cancer(SCLC).Methods: A total of 156 SCLC patients were divided into CPT-11(n=88) and TPT group(n=68).Efficacy was observed and compared.Results There was no significant difference in short-term curative effects and long-term among curative effects between the two groups(P0.05).Incidence of leucopenia in TPT group was significantly higher than CPT-11 group(P0.05).Incidence of delayed diarrhea in CPT-11 group was significantly higher than TPT group(P0.05).There was no significant difference in incidence of anemia,thrombocytopenia,nausea vomiting nor abnormal liver function(P0.05).Conclusion: There is no significant difference in short-term curative effects and long-term among curative effects between the two groups;CPT-11 is better than that of TPT group in blood toxicity reaction;TPT group is better than the CPT-11 group in gut reaction.
作者 顾寄树
出处 《海南医学院学报》 CAS 2013年第6期785-787,790,共4页 Journal of Hainan Medical University
基金 中国高校医学期刊临床专项资金项目(112210669)~~
关键词 伊立替康 拓扑替康 小细胞肺癌 不良反应 CPT-11 TPT SCLC Side-effects
  • 相关文献

参考文献10

二级参考文献53

  • 1荆新建,任中海,杜敏.金喜素联合顺铂治疗晚期非小细胞肺癌56例近期疗效观察[J].中国全科医学,2004,7(20):1504-1505. 被引量:10
  • 2李明.化疗放疗同步与序贯治疗晚期非小细胞肺癌疗效对比观察[J].中国误诊学杂志,2006,6(10):1863-1864. 被引量:3
  • 3李兰芳,王华庆.小细胞肺癌的二线化疗及研究进展[J].肿瘤研究与临床,2006,18(6):424-426. 被引量:15
  • 4Schiller JH, Harrington D. Comparison of four chemotherapy regimens for advanced non-small cell lung cancer [J]. N Engl J Med, 2002, 346(2): 92-8.
  • 5Zhou Y, Gwadry FG, Reinhold WC, et al. Transcriptional regulation of mitotic genes by camptothecin-induced DNA damage: microarray analysis of dose- and time- dependen effects [ J ]. Cancer Res, 2002, 62(6): 1688-95.
  • 6Jagasia MH, Langer CJ, Johson DH, et al. Weekly irinotecan and cisplatin in advanced non-small cell lung cancer: A multicenter phase II study[J]. Clin Cancer Res, 2001, 7(1): 68-73.
  • 7Ikuno N, Soda H, Watanabe M, et al. Lrinotecan (CPT-11) and characteristic mucosal changes in the mouse ileum and cecum [J]. J Natl Cancer Inst, 1995, 87(24): 1 876-83.
  • 8DeVore RF, Johnson DH, Crawford J, et al. Phase II study of irinotecan plus cisplatin in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer[J]. J Clin Oncol, 1999, 17(9): 2710-20.
  • 9Moil K, Machida S, Yoshida T, et al. A phase II study of irinotecan and infusional cispiatin with recombinant human granulocyte colony-stimulating factor support for advanced non-small-cell lung cancer[J ]. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol, 1999, 43(6): 467-70.
  • 10Saito H, Kudoh S, Nakagawa K, et al. Phase II study of 3-week scheduling of irinotecan in combination with cisplatin in patients with advanced non small-cell lung cancer [J]. Am J Clin Oncol, 2006, 29(5): 503-7.

共引文献55

同被引文献25

  • 1Fujiwara Y, Minami H. An overview of the recent progress in irinotecan pharmacogenetics [ J ]. Pharmacogenomics, 2010,11(3) :391-406.
  • 2de Jong F A, Kehrer D F, Mathijssen R H, et al. Prophy- laxis of irinotecan-induced diarrhea with neomycin and po- tential role for UGT1AI" 28 genotype screening: a double- blind, randomized, placebo-controlled study[J]. Oncologist, 2006,11 (8) :944-954.
  • 3Innocenti F, Kroetz D L, Schuetz E, et al. Comprehensive pharmacogenetic analysis of irinotecan neutropenia and phar- maeokineties [ J J . J Clln Oneol , 2009,27(16):2604-2614.
  • 4Hahn K K, Wolff J J, Kolesar J M. Pharmacogenetics and irinotecan therapy [ J ]. Am J Health Syst Pharm, 2006,63 (22) :2211-2217.
  • 5Ando Y, Saka H, Ando M, et al. Polymorphisms of UDP- glucuronosyltransferase gene and irinotecan toxicity: aphar- macogenetic analysis [ J ]. Cancer Res, 2000,60 ( 24 ) : 6921- 6926.
  • 6Innocenti F, Undevia S D, lyer L, et al. Genetic variants in the UDP-glueuronosyltransferase 1A1 gene predict the risk of severeneutropenia of irinotecan [ J ]. J Clin Oncol, 2004,22 (8) :1382-1388.
  • 7Desai A A, Innocenti F, Ratain M J. Pharmacogenomies: road to anticancer therapeutics nirvana? [ J ]. Oncogene, 2003,22 ( 42 ) : 6621-6628.
  • 8Onoue M, Terada T, Kobayashi M, et al. UGT1A1 *6 poly- morphism is most predictive of severe neutropenia induced by irinotecan inJapanese cancer patients [ J ]. Int J Clin Oncol, 2009,14(2) :136-142.
  • 9Takano M, Kato M, Yoshikawa T, et al. Clinical signifi- cance of UDP-glucuronosyltransferase 1A1 *6 for toxicities of combination chemotherapy with irinoteean and cisplatin in gynecologic cancers: a prospective multi-institutional study [J]. Oncology, 2009,76(5) :315-321.
  • 10Rouits E, Charasson V, P6tain A, et al. Pharmacokinetie and pharmacogenetic determinants of the activity and toxicity of irinoteean inmetastatie coloreetal cancer patients [ J ]. Br J Cancer, 2008,99(8) :1239-1245.

引证文献2

二级引证文献9

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部