期刊文献+

葡萄球菌属诱导型克林霉素耐药及基因型分析

Inducible resistance of erythromycin to clindamcycin and resistance genes in Staphylococci
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的测定葡萄球菌属对红霉素及克林霉素的耐药性,分析红霉素诱导克林霉素耐药的发生率以及耐药基因的类型。方法用K-B法检测葡萄球菌属对红霉素及克林霉素的耐药性,依据CLSI2011年推荐的D试验方法,测定红霉素对克林霉素的诱导耐药表型,并采用聚合酶链反应PCR技术检测耐药基因型。结果2009~2011年红霉素和克林霉素同时耐药(cMLSB)菌株占葡萄球菌的比例分别是48.9%、52.0%、61.2%,随着时间的增长有升高的趋势。而D试验阳性(iMLSB)菌株占所检测葡萄球菌属的比例随着时间的增长有下降的趋势,分别是19.6%、18.5%、11.9%。这两种趋势在金黄色葡萄球中表现尤为明显。D试验阳性(iMLSB)菌株在对红霉素耐药而克林霉素敏感的葡萄球菌株所占的比例在三个不同时间段分别是58.2%、56.6%、56.5%。耐药基因分析表明:红霉素核糖体甲基化酶基因ermC是诱导耐药的主要基因。结论临床微生物实验室应开展D试验,检测葡萄球菌属中红霉素对克林霉素的诱导耐药,指导临床医生更合理使用抗菌药物。 Objective To detect the resistance of Staphylococci to erythromycin" and Clindamycin, and analyze the prevalence and resistance gene for inducilb resistance in Staphylococci.Methods The susceptibilities to erythromycin and clindamycin for Staphylococci were examined by Kirby-Bauer disc agar diffusion test and the inducible resistance of erythromycin to clindamycin was checked by D-test according to the standards of CLSI 2011,erm genes were detected by using PCR technology.Results Co-resistance strains to erythromycin and clindamycin accounted for 48.9%, 56.6% and 56.5% in the years-2009, 2010 and 2011 respectively, showing a yearly increasing trend. The rate of D-test positive exhibited a downward trend with the passage of time, registering 19.6%, 18.5% and 11.9% in the corresponding years respectively.Both trends were especially remarkable in Staphylococcus aureus.The rate of D-test positive Staphylococcus strains which were erythromycin resistant and clindamycin sensitive was 58.2%,56.6% and 56.5% respectively in the examined three years. The ermC gene was the major factor of erythromycin' s inducible resistance to clindamycino Conclusions The inducible resistance of erythromycin to clindamycin in Staphylococci should be detected by D-test in clinical microbiology laboratory in order to guide physicians to select reasonable antibiotics for Staphylococcal infections.
出处 《中国热带医学》 CAS 2013年第1期8-11,共4页 China Tropical Medicine
基金 福建省自然科学基金资助(No.2012D039)
关键词 葡萄球菌属 红霉素 克林霉素 D-试验 耐药基因 Staphylococcus Erythromycin Clindamycin D-test Resistance gene
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

  • 1Siberry G K,Tekle T,Carmll K,et al. Failure of lindamycin treatment of Methicillin-resistantStaphylococcus aureus expressing inducible clindamycin resistance in vitro[J]. Clin Infect Dis.2003,37:1257-1260:.
  • 2Schwendener S,Perreten :. New MLSB Resistance Gene erm(43) in Staphylococcus lentus[J]. Antimicrob Agents Chemother,2012,56(9): 4746-4752.
  • 3彭少华,罗少锋,吕霞.葡萄球菌中两类D试验阳性表型及基因分析[J].中国感染与化疗杂志,2007,7(6):408-411. 被引量:6
  • 4Christine DS,Patti MR,AUison KM,et al. Testing for induction of clinda- mycin resistance in erythromycin-resistant isolates of Staphylococcus aureus[J]. LIN Microbiol,2005,43(4):1716-1721.
  • 5Eun-Jeong Yoon, Ae-Ran Kwon t, Yu-Hong Min, et al. Foggy D-shaped zone of inhibiti:n in Staphylococcus aureus owing to a dual character of both inducible and constitutive resistance to macro- lide-lincosamide-streptogramin B[J]. Journal of Antimicrobial Chemo- therapy,2008,61(533 - 540).
  • 6刘庆中,刘欢乐,陈志雄,周铁丽,李超,郑佳音,王赛芳.金黄色葡萄球菌对大环内酯、林可酰胺和链阳霉素B类耐药性检测[J].中华医院感染学杂志,2007,17(2):207-209. 被引量:12
  • 7Min Yu-Hong, Kwon Ae-Ran,Yoon Jong-Min,et al. Molecular analysis of constitutive mutations in ermB and ermA selected in vitro from in- ducibly MLSB-resistant enterococci[J].Archives of Pharmacal Re- search.2008,31 (3):377-380.
  • 8Daurel Claire,Huet Corinne,Dhalluin Anne,et al.Differences in poten- tial. for selection of clindamycin-resistant mutants between inducible erm(A) and erm(C) Staphylococcus aureus genes[J]. Journal of Clinical Microbiology,2008,46(2):546-550.

二级参考文献11

  • 1沈定霞,罗燕萍,徐雅萍,张秀菊,周光.葡萄球菌对红霉素和克林霉素的诱导耐药性研究[J].中华检验医学杂志,2005,28(4):400-402. 被引量:114
  • 2应群华,马雪莲,黄静,章顺婷.检测克林霉素诱导耐药的葡萄球菌[J].中华微生物学和免疫学杂志,2005,25(10):863-864. 被引量:3
  • 3Fiebelkorn KR,Crawford SA,McElmeel ML,et al.Practical disk diffusion method for detection of inducible clindamycin resistance in Staphylococcus aureus and coagulase-negative staphylococci[J].Clin Microbiol,2003,41:4740-4744.
  • 4NCCLS.Performance standards for antimicrobial susceptibility testing[S].Fourteenth informational supplement.NCCLS document M100-S14.Wayne,Pennsylvania:National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards,2004.24(1):40-47.
  • 5Christine DS,Patti M R,Allison KM,et al.Testing for induction of clindamycin resistance in erythromycin-resistant isolates of Staphylococcus aureus[J].Clin Microbiol,2005,43(4):1716-1721.
  • 6Vicki AL,Heiken M,Judge K,et al.Kathleen Judge distribution of mef(A) in Gram-positive bacteria from healthy Portuguese children[J].Antimicrob Agents Chemother,2002,46(8):2513-2517.
  • 7Leclercq R. Mechanisms of resistance to macrolides and linco samides:nature of the resitance elements and their clinical im plications[J]. Clin Infect Dis.2002.34(4):482-492.
  • 8Weisblam B. Insights into erythromycin action from studies of its activity as inducer of resistance[J]. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1995.39( 4 ) : 797-805.
  • 9Steward ('1), Raney PM. Morrell AK, et al. Testing for induction clindamycin resistance in erythromycin-resistance iso lates of staphylococcus aureus[J]. J Clin Mierobiol, 20115.43 (4),1716-1721.
  • 10Scbwarz S, Kehrenberg Ojo KK. Staphylococcus sciuri gene erm( 33 ). encoding inducible resistance to macrolides, lincosamides.and streptogramin B antibiotics, is a product of recombination betweenerm(C) and erm(A)[J]. Antimicrob Agents Chemother.2002,46( 11 ) :3621-3623.

共引文献15

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部