期刊文献+

非瓣膜病房颤患者不同强度抗凝的疗效分析 被引量:3

Efficacy Analysis of the Different Intensity of Anticoagulation in Patients with Non-valvular Atrial Fibrillation
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的分析非瓣膜病房颤患者不同强度抗凝的治疗效果。方法把我院2005年1月到2011年10月有效随访的236例非瓣膜病房颤患者,分成四组,第一组61例,采用阿司匹林(100mg/d)抗凝治疗;第二组54例,采用华法林(INR1.5-2.0)抗凝治疗;第三组63例,采用华法林(INR2.01-2.5)抗凝治疗;第四组58例,采用华法林(INR2.51-3.0)抗凝治疗。最后对四组患者在随访期内的血栓事件及出血事件进行比较。结果第一组患者的栓塞事件发生率为13.1%,高于其他各组,差异有显著性(P<0.05),第四组栓塞事件发生率为1.7%,低于其他组,差异有显著性(P<0.05)。第四组严重血事件发生率10.3%,高于其他各组(P<0.05),而第一组无严重出血事件发生,低于其他组,差异有显著性(P<0.05),但在总出血发生率上四组比较差异无显著性(P>0.05)。结论在非瓣膜病房颤患者抗凝治疗中,华法林预防栓塞疗效优于阿司匹林,随INR强度上升栓塞事件发生降低,但严重出血风险升高,INR1.5-2.5时有效且安全,推荐国人采用。 Objective To analyze the treatment effects of atrial fibrillation patients with non-valvular disease treated by antieoagulation with different strength. Method From January 2005 to October 2011, 236 randomly selected atrial fibrillation patients with non-valvular disease are divided into 4 groups. Group 1 with 61 cases treated by aspirin(100mg/d) anticoagulation, Group 2 with 54 cases treated by warfarin (INR1.5-2.0) anticoagulation, Group 3 with 63 cases treated by warfarin (INR2.01-2.5) anticoagulation, Group 4 58 cases treated by warfarin (INR2.51-3.0) anticoagulation. At last, the events of thrombus and bleeding among 4 groups during research is compared. Result The incidence rate of thrombus in Group 1 is 13.1% which is higher than the other groups, difference is significant(P〈0.05), while that in Group 4 is 1.7% which is lower than the other groups, difference is significant(P〈0.05). The incidence rate of serious bleeding in Group 4 is 10.3% which is higher than the other groups(P〈0.05), while there is no serious bleeding in Group 1 which is lower than the other groups, difference is significant(P〈0.05). But at the aspect of total bleeding rate, difference among 4 groups is no significance (P〉0.05). Conclusion In the anticoagulation treatment of atrial fibrillation patients with non-valvular disease, embolism prevention by warfarin is better than aspirin, although the incidence rate of embolism will decrease with 1NR strength rising, the risk of serious bleeding will increase, INR1.5-2.5, effective and safe, is worth recommending.
出处 《中国医药指南》 2013年第8期41-42,共2页 Guide of China Medicine
关键词 非瓣膜病 房颤 不同抗凝强度 华法林 Non-valvular disease Atrial fibrillation Anticoagulation with different strength Warfarin
  • 相关文献

参考文献11

  • 1周自强,胡大一,陈捷,张仁汉,李奎宝,赵秀丽.中国心房颤动现状的流行病学研究[J].中华内科杂志,2004,43(7):491-494. 被引量:1399
  • 2Hu D,Sun Y.Epidemiology,Risk Facters for Stroke,and Manag-ement of Atrial Fibrillation in China[J].J Am Coll Cardiol,2008,52(10):865-868.
  • 3梁秋玲,尹金柱,曾育辉,潘敏.心房颤动120例临床分析[J].现代医院,2008,8(4):36-38. 被引量:4
  • 4Hylek EM,Chang Y.Effect of intensity of oral anticoagulation onstroke severity and mortality in atrial fibrillation[J].N Eng J Med,2003,349(11):1019-1026.
  • 5Nozawa T,Inoue H,Iwasa A,et al.Effects of anticoagulation intensityon hemostatic markers in Patients with non-valvular atrial fibrill-ation[J].Circ J,2004,68(1):29-34.
  • 6Levy S,Maarek M,Coumel P,et al.for the College of FrenchCardiologist Characterization of diffent subsets of atrial fibrillationin general practice in France:The ALFA study[J].Circulation,1999,99(23):3028.
  • 7TANK K T,LIP G Y.Atrial fibrillation:should we target plateletsor the coagulation pathway?[J].Cadr Electrophysiol Rev,2003,7(4):370-371.
  • 8Connolly SJ,Ezekowitz MD,Yusuf S,et al.Dabigatran versus war-farin in patients with Atrial fibrillation[J].N Engl J Med,2009,361(12):1139-1151.
  • 9Patel MR,Mahaffey KW,Garg J,et al.Rivaroxaban versus warfarinin patients with Atrial fibrillation[J].N Engl J Med,2011,365(10):883-891.
  • 10Granger CB,Alexander JH,McMurrayJJ,et al.Apixaban versuswarfarin in patients with Atrial fibrillation[J].N Engl J Med,2011,365(11):981-992.

二级参考文献9

  • 1黄从新,马长生,杨延宗,黄德嘉,张澍,江洪,杨新春,吴书林,马坚,刘少稳,李莉,曹克将,王方正,陈新.心房颤动:目前的认识和治疗建议(二)[J].中华心律失常学杂志,2006,10(3):167-197. 被引量:269
  • 2KANNOL W B, ABBOTT R D,SAVAGE D D,et al. Epidemiologic features of chronic atrial fibrillation: the Framingham study[ J ]. Engl J Med, 1982,306 : 1018 - 1022.
  • 3CHOBANIAN A V, BAKRIS G L, BLACK H R,et al. The seventh report of the Joint National on prevention, detection, evaluation and treatment of hing biood pressure[J]. JAMA, 2003,289 (19) :2560 -2571.
  • 4WHYNDHAM C R. Atrial fibrillation: the most common arrhythmia[J]. Tex Heart Inst J,2000,27(3) :257 -267.
  • 5YIN Y H,DALA D,LIU Z C ,et al. Prospective randomized study comparing amiodarone vs amiodarone plus losartan vs amiodarne plus perindopfil for prevention of artrial fibrillation recurrence in patients with lone paroxysmal atrial fibrillation [ J]. Eur Heart J, 2006,27 : 1841 - 1846.
  • 6WYSE D G, WALDO A L , DIMACRO J P,et al. A comparison of rate control and rhythm control in patient with atrial fibrillation [J]. N Engl J Med, 2002,347,1825 - 1833.
  • 7PETERSEN P. Thromboemblic complications in atrial fibfillatoin [J]. Stroke ,1990,21:4 - 13.
  • 8WOLF P A,ABBOTr R D,KANNEL W B, et al. Atrial fibrillation as independent risk factor for stroke: the Framingham study [ J]. Stroke, 1991,22:983 - 988.
  • 9胡大一,孙艺红,周自强,李奎宝,倪永斌,杨光,孙淑红,李蕾.中国人非瓣膜性心房颤动脑卒中危险因素的病例-对照研究[J].中华内科杂志,2003,42(3):157-161. 被引量:360

共引文献1400

同被引文献27

引证文献3

二级引证文献21

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部