期刊文献+

理性/情绪性防御量表中文版的信效度研究

Reliability and Validity of the Rationality/Emotional Defensiveness Scale
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的检验理性/情绪性防御量表(R/ED)中文版在我国女性乳腺癌患者中的适用性。方法选取276名女性乳腺癌患者完成理性/情绪性防御量表,同时采用C型行为量表作为校标测量工具。结果理性/情绪性防御量表全量表的Cronbach'sα系数为0.92,两因子的α系数均在0.90以上;全量表条目间的平均相关系数为0.50;间隔两周全量表的重测信度为0.95,两因子的重测信度均在0.90以上;与C型行为愤怒内向和合理化因子的相关分析也发现理性/情绪性防御量表具有良好的校标关联效度;验证性因素分析结果支持两因子结构。结论理性/情绪性防御量表中文版能有效评估我国女性乳腺癌患者的情绪抑制行为。 Objective To evaluate the reliability and validity of Chinese version of the Rationality/Emotional Defensiveness Scale in women diagnosed with breast cancer. Methods A total of 276 women with breast cancer were questioned by the Rationality/E- motional Defensiveness Scale and Type C Behavior Questionnaire. Results The Cronbach's alpha coefficient for the total scale was 0. 92 and for the two factors were over 0. 90;tbe mean inter-item correlation coefficient for the Rationality/Emotional Defensive- ness Scale was 0.50;the test-retest reliability for the total scale was 0.95 and for the two factors were over 0. 90;The, confirmatory factor analysis results confirmed the structure of the original version of two factors model. Conclusion The Rationality/Emotional Defensiveness Scale is a reliable and valid measure for Chinese women with breast cancer.
出处 《中国健康心理学杂志》 2013年第5期699-701,共3页 China Journal of Health Psychology
基金 国家"十一五"科技支撑计划课题(2009BAI77B06)基金资助
关键词 理性 情绪性防御 乳腺癌 信度 效度 Rationality ~Emotional defensiveness Breast cancer Reliability Validity
  • 相关文献

参考文献9

  • 1Eysenck H J. Cancer,personality and stress;Prediction and preven- tion[J]. Advances in Behavior Research and Therapy, 1994,16 : 167- 215.
  • 2Greet S Watson M. Towards a psychobiological model of cancer: Psychological considerations [J]. Social Science and Medicine, 1985, 20:773-777.
  • 3Bleiker E M,van der Ploeg H M,Hendriks J H C L,et al. Personality factors and breast cancer development: A prospective longitudinal study[J]. Journal of National Cancer Institute,1996,88:1478-1482.
  • 4Eskelinen M, Ollonen P. Assessment of cancer- prone personality characteristics in healthy study subjects and in patients with breast disease and breast cancer using the commitment questionnaire: A prospective case-control study in Finland[J]. Antieancer Research, 2011,31(11):4013-4017.
  • 5Fernandes-Bal[esteros R,Zamaron M D,Ruiz M A,et al. Assessing emotional expression:Spanish adaptation of the rationality/emotion- al defensiveness scale [J]. Personality and Individual Differences, 1997,22:719-729.
  • 6Fernandez-Ballesteros R,Ruiz M A,Garde S. Emotional expression in healthy women and those with breast cancer[J]. British Journal of Health Psychology, 1998,3 41-50.
  • 7Spielberger C D,Reheiser E C. Psychological defense mechanisms, motivation and the use of tobacco[J]. Personality and Individual Dif- ferences, 2006,41 (6) : 1033-1043.
  • 8Henson R K,Kogan L R,Vacha-Haase T. A reliability generaliza- tion study of the teacher efficacy scale and related instruments[J]. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 2001,61 : 404-420.
  • 9Clark L A,Watson D. Constructing validity Basic issues in scale development [J 7. Psychology Assessment, 1995,7 : 309- 319.

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部