摘要
日本学界对西田几多郎与"近代的超克"之间的关系问题,以及西田哲学的世界观与"京都学派"的哲学家提出的"世界史的哲学"的关系问题,日本学者大多从寻找差异的角度展开论证。然而,从二者的理论构成和逻辑推演入手分析,可以看出,不论是对日本国家的"道义的生命力"的解读,还是对太平洋战争的认识,"近代的超克"论和"京都学派"哲学家的问题视角、思想倾向、哲学逻辑和方法论几乎都来源于西田哲学。
As to the relationship between Nishida Kitaro and overcome modernity, as well as the relationship between the world- views of Nishida philosophy and the philosophy of world history raised by the philosophers of Kyoto school, most of the Japanese schol- ars' arguments focus on their difference. But if we analyze from the theoretic formation and logical deduction, it can be perceived from the interpretation to the moral vitalityof Japan and the understanding of the Pacific War that the theory of overcome modernity and the perspective, ideological tendency, philosophical logic and methodology of philosophers of Kyoto school all derive from Nishida philoso- phy.
出处
《北方论丛》
CSSCI
北大核心
2013年第3期81-85,共5页
The Northern Forum
基金
黑龙江省社会科学基金资助项目(06B014)
国家社科基金青年项目:(11CSS004)
哈尔滨师范大学青年学术骨干资助计划项目(sgb2011-03)