摘要
管制性征收制度肇始于美国,通过梳理联邦最高法院关于管制性征收的典型判例可以发现,以"价值减损程度"为核心的两要素标准,结合特定事实审查,已成为判断管制性征收的主导性标尺。管制行为导致相对人合法权益受损的问题在我国也已大量出现,从美国私人财产权保护运作中汲取有益因素,可以对解决中国的征收问题有所启发。
The regulatory takings system started in America. Through combing Federal Supreme Court's typical cases on regulatory takings, it can be found that the mode combining two elements standard with ‘valueimpairment degree' as its core with specific facts review becomes the dominant criterion of judging regulatory takings. The damage of counterparts' lawful rights and interests caused by regulatory actions emerges a lot inChina. Drawing beneficial factors from America's protective operation of private property rights can provide some enlightenment for solving China's expropriation problems.
出处
《行政法学研究》
CSSCI
北大核心
2013年第2期132-137,共6页
ADMINISTRATIVE LAW REVIEW
关键词
管制性征收
价值减损程度
公共利益
Regulatory Takings
Value Impairment Degree
Public Interest