期刊文献+

司法过程的直觉及其偏差控制 被引量:77

Intuition and Its Bias Control in the Judicial Process
原文传递
导出
摘要 作为相对独立存在的认知加工系统,直觉与"理性—分析"系统共同处理各种信息。直觉机制以自动化方式发挥先行的加工作用,在信息不充分和判断不确定情形中,为理性分析提供基础。在司法过程中,直觉通过获取法条、形成初始结论为法律推理提供前提,逻辑自动化型直觉还可以省略认知过程、快捷获得结论。但直觉可能产生偏差,导致结论偏离实际,所以要通过诉讼程序、司法管理等制度设计对直觉进行深度监控。理想的司法认知至少需直觉、检测与证立三道工序,对应发现结论、防范直觉偏差、修正不合理理由三个认知功能,完成为案件提供答案、保证客观性、展现正当性三重司法任务。 As a relatively independent cognitive processing system, intuition works with the 'rationalanalytic' system in processing all kinds of information. The intuitive mechanism plays its leading processing role by way of authomaticity, and provides a basis for rational analysis in cases of inadequate information and uncertain judgment. In the judicial process, intuition provides a prerequisite for legal reasoning by accessing legal provisions and drawing initial conclusions. Logical automatic intuition can also jump over the cognitive process to make a fast conclusion. Meanwhile, intuition tends to induce biases, causing a deviation of the conclusion from the reality. Therefore, intuition must be closely monitored through institutional designs such as proceedings and judicial administration. An ideal judicial notice needs at least three procedures (intuition, check and argumentation), plays three cognitive functions (conclusion discovery, prevention of biased intuition, and revision of unreasonable reasons), and fulfills three judicial tasks (providing an answer to a case, guaranteeing objectivity and demonstrating legitimacy).
作者 李安
出处 《中国社会科学》 CSSCI 北大核心 2013年第5期142-161,207-208,共20页 Social Sciences in China
  • 相关文献

参考文献62

  • 1陈景辉.“开放结构”的诸层次反省哈特的法律推理理论[J].中外法学,2011,23(4):665-680. 被引量:23
  • 2Neil Duxbury, "Jerome Frank and the Legacy of Legal Realism, " Journal of Law and Society, vol. 18, no. 2 (Summer 1991), pp. 184-186.
  • 3Joshua D. Greene, R. Brian Sommerville, Leigh E. Nystrom, John M. Darley and Jonathan D. Cohen, "An fMRI Investigation of Emotional Engagement in Moral Judgment, " Science, vol. 293, no. 5537 (September 2001), pp. 2105-2108.
  • 4Chris Guthrie, Jeffrey J. Rachlinski and An Empirical Examination of Executive no. 7 (April 2009), pp. 1478-1491. Andrew J. Wistrich, "The ' Hidden Judiciary' : Branch Justice, " Duke Law Journal, vol. 58,.
  • 5Rodney A. Smolla, "Let Us Now Praise Famous Judges: Exploring the Roles of Judicial 'Intuition' and 'Activism'in American Law, " University of Richmond Law Review, vol. 40, no. 1 (November 2005), pp. 40-41.
  • 6Mark A. Small, "Legal Psychology and Therapeutic Jurisprudence, " Saint Louis University Law Journal, vol. 37, no. 3 (Spring 1993), p. 693.
  • 7Gerd Gigerenzer, "Why Heuristics Work," Perspectives on Psychological Science, vol. 3, no. 1 (January 2008), pp. 20-21.
  • 8Marta Sinclair and Neal M. Ashkanasy, "Intuition: Myth or a Decision-Making Tool?" Management Learning, vol. 36, no. 3 (August 2005), pp. 355-358.
  • 9Amy L. Baylor, "A Three-Component Conception of Intuition: Immediacy, Sensing Relationships, and Reason," New Ideas in Psychol, vol. 15, no. 2 (August 1997), p. 186.
  • 10Horace Barlow, "Conditions for Versatile Learning, Helmholtz's Unconscious Inference, and the Task of Perception, " Vision Research, vol. 30, no. 11 (March 1990), p. 1562.

二级参考文献166

共引文献270

同被引文献1268

引证文献77

二级引证文献485

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部