期刊文献+

隐性双轨制:刑法中保安处分的教义学阐释 被引量:85

A Dogmatic Analysis on Security Measures in Current Criminal Code
原文传递
导出
摘要 我国现行法律中虽无保安处分的概念,但在刑法中已实质性地存在保安处分,其与刑罚共同构成刑法所规定的法律后果,由此形成"隐性双轨制"的格局。对保安处分规范的识别,首先应从与罪责的关系上、目的与功能的差异上明晰刑罚与保安处分的基本界分,进而从法律特征上区分刑罚规范与保安处分规范,最终将现行刑法中的保安处分措施"挖掘"出来。澄清现行刑法中保安处分措施的性质和法律地位,有利于确保这类措施的正当适用,同时也有利于保障个人的基本权利免受不当干涉。 There is no legal term of security measures in the current legal system of China, however, there are legal norms with the nature of security measure in Chinese criminal law. In order to identify the legal norms of security measures provided in the criminal code, the difference between the penalty norms and the security measures norms should be clarified by defining their relationship with responsi- bility and their respective aim and function. The apphcation of security measures is not relevant to the responsibility, but based on the dangerousness of applicable individuals. If retribution is considered as one of the comprehensive goals or functions of criminal penalty, security measures can be distin- guished from the former according to its different goal and function. Therefore, if a legal norm provided by the criminal code can be applied to limit or deprive the rights or interests of an individual who has committed a crime or a criminal illegal act, and its sub- stantial ground is his/her dangerousness other than responsibility, such a norm should be considered as one with the nature of security measure. Judged by their normative characteristics, specific security measures in current Chinese criminal law include sheltering and rehabilitating, compulsory medical treatment on insane persons without ability of taking criminal responsibility, deportation, injunction order, compulsive laboring, criminal confiscation ing parole. , supervision during probation, and supervision dur- The existence of a framework of invisible Zweispurigkeit in current criminal code would have many effects on criminal law theory. For the theoretical system, security measures should be treated as a basic concept and construct the legal result together with the criminal penalty of the criminal law. Besides, the concurrent application, retrospective effect, proportionality, declaration of such meas- ures should be discussed specifically in dogmatic field.
作者 时延安
出处 《法学研究》 CSSCI 北大核心 2013年第3期140-157,共18页 Chinese Journal of Law
关键词 保安处分 刑罚 隐性双轨制 权利保障 security measures criminal penalty System der Zweispurigkeit human rights
  • 相关文献

参考文献27

  • 1高铭喧、马克昌主编.《刑法学》,北京大学出版社、高等教育出版社2011年第五版,第119-121页.
  • 2高铭喧:《中华人民共和国刑法的孕育诞生和发展完善》,北京大学出版社2012年版,第203页.
  • 3屈学武.保安处分与中国刑法改革[J].法学研究,1996,18(5):56-69. 被引量:93
  • 4侯保田.我国现行法中的保安处分[J].法律科学(西北政法大学学报),1994,16(4):41-46. 被引量:11
  • 5张明楷.论刑法中的没收[J].法学家,2012(3):55-70. 被引量:162
  • 6张勇.禁止令:保安处分刑法化的试金石[J].湖南师范大学社会科学学报,2011,40(6):64-68. 被引量:34
  • 7张天一.《两岸保安处分制度之比较--以施用毒品之保安处分为中心》,台湾《军法专刊》2009年第4期.
  • 8[日]大蟓仁.《刑法概说(总论)》,冯军译,中国人民大学出版社2003年版,第107页.
  • 9[日]野村稔 全理其 何力译.《刑法总论》[M].法律出版社,2001年版.第346-352页.
  • 10[法]卡斯东·斯特法尼等.《法国刑法总论精义》,罗结珍译.中国政法大学出版社,1998年版,第132页,第135页.

二级参考文献18

  • 1屈学武.保安处分与中国刑法改革[J].法学研究,1996,18(5):56-69. 被引量:93
  • 2翟中东.保安处分适用的瓶颈及其解决[J].法学论坛,2002,17(6):28-34. 被引量:17
  • 3徐久生.德语国家的保安处分制度——理论、法律规定及实践[J].中国监狱学刊,2007,22(4):37-44. 被引量:9
  • 4相关负责人就管制犯缓刑犯适用禁止令规定答问[EB/OL].中新网,http://www.chinanews.com/fz/2011/05.04/3015211.shtml.2011-09-09.
  • 5陈鹏展.对禁止令的理解与适用[EB/OL].中国法院网,http:llwww.chinacourt.org/html/article/201105/04/449934.shtml,2011-08-29.
  • 6[法]卡斯东·斯特法尼.法国刑法总论精义(罗结珍译)[M].北京:中国政法大学出版社,1998.
  • 7苏俊雄刑法总论[M].台北:台湾大地印刷厂股份有限公司,1995.
  • 8[法]安塞尔.新刑法理论(卢建平译)[M].香港:香港天地图书有限公司,1990.
  • 9林山田.《刑法通论》下册,作者发行2008年增订10版.
  • 10[日]团藤重光.《刑法纲要总论》,创文社1990年第3版.

共引文献646

同被引文献809

引证文献85

二级引证文献376

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部