期刊文献+

财富约束条件下损失厌恶投资者的动态投资组合选择 被引量:9

Dynamic portfolio selection for loss-averse investors with wealth constraints
原文传递
导出
摘要 在完全市场框架下,假定投资者是损失厌恶的,研究了财富非负和带有基准下限约束条件下一般情形的动态投资组合选择模型.利用鞅方法,分别获得了投资者的最优期末财富水平,证明了相应的拉格朗日乘子的存在唯一性.分析了这些解的性质,并且和传统风险厌恶投资者的最优解进行了比较.最后讨论了一个具体例子,给出了最优财富过程和最优投资策略的解析表达式.通过理论的结果和图形的显示,可以发现损失厌恶投资者的最优财富随着市场状态的变化会出现突变,如果考虑基准下限约束,则其投资策略相对保守,可以避免由于突变所造成的大的损失. This paper studies a general dynamic portfolio selection model for loss-averse investors with wealth constraints in a complete market. By applying the martingale approach, we derive the optimal terminal wealth of the investors with or without the benchmark floor constraints respectively. Simultane- ously, the existence and uniqueness of the corresponding Lagrange multiplier are proved. We analyze the properties of these solutions, and compare them to that of the general risk-avers investors. An example with a two-piece power utility is presented to obtain the optimal wealth processes and the investment strategies by the replicating technique. By the theories and figures, it can be seen that the optimal wealth of the loss-averse investors has discontinuous jump with the change of market circumstances. If considering the benchmark floor constraint, then their investment strategies are relatively conservative and great losses can be avoided.
作者 米辉 张曙光
出处 《系统工程理论与实践》 EI CSSCI CSCD 北大核心 2013年第5期1107-1115,共9页 Systems Engineering-Theory & Practice
基金 国家重点基础研究发展计划(2007CB814901) 国家自然科学基金(11101215) 江苏省教育厅自然科学基金(12KJB110011)
关键词 财富约束 损失厌恶 投资组合选择 鞅方法 wealth constraints loss aversion portfolio selection martingale method
  • 相关文献

参考文献19

  • 1Merton R C. Continuous-time nance[M]. Basil Blackwell, Oxford and Cambridge, 1990.
  • 2Karatzas I, Shreve S E. Methods of mathematical nance[M]. Springer-Verlag, New York, 1998.
  • 3Kahneman D, Tversky A. Prospect theory —— Analysis of decision under risk[J]. Econometrica, 1979, 47(2):263-291.
  • 4Tversky A, Kahneman D. Advances in prospect theory —— Cumulative representation of uncertainty[J]. Journalof Risk and Uncertainty, 1992, 5(4): 297-323.
  • 5Schmeidler D. Subjective-probability and expected utility without additivity[J]. Econometrica, 1989, 57(3): 571-587.
  • 6Yaari M E. The dual theory of choice under risk[J]. Econometrica, 1987, 55(1): 95-115.
  • 7Jin H Q, Zhou X Y. Behavioral portfolio selection in continuous time[J]. Mathematical Finance, 2008, 18(3):385-426.
  • 8Gomes F J. Portfolio choice and trading volume with loss-averse investors[J]. The Journal of Business, 2005,78(2): 675-706.
  • 9Barberis N, Huang M, Santos T. Prospect theory and asset prices[J]. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 2001,116(1): 1-53.
  • 10Barberis N, Huang M. Stocks as lotteries: The implications of probability weighting for security prices[J]. TheAmerican Economic Review, 2008, 98(5): 2066-2100.

同被引文献93

引证文献9

二级引证文献13

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部