期刊文献+

弯曲型与剪切型多自由度体系抗震强度折减系数比较分析 被引量:2

Comparison of Seismic Strength Reduction Factors for MDOF Flexure-Type and Shear-Type Systems
下载PDF
导出
摘要 研究弯曲型与剪切型多自由度体系的抗震强度折减系数的差异.采用4条中硬土类场地的地震动记录,以多质点系悬臂柱模拟弯曲型剪力墙结构,抗侧移串联弹簧系统模拟剪切型框架结构,通过非线性动力时程分析,研究楼层位移延性水平和基本振动周期对弯曲型结构抗震强度折减系数的影响,并比较与剪切型结构抗震强度折减系数的差异.分析结果表明:弯曲型结构的抗震强度折减系数比剪切型结构的抗震强度折减系数总体上约大40%;楼层数和位移延性水平是结构抗震强度折减系数的重要影响因素. The difference of strength reduction factors between flexure-type and shear-type multi-degree- freedom (MDOF) systems are studied. Multi-mass column cantilever systems are used to simulate flexure- type shear-wall structure, and multi-mass series spring connection systems are used to simulate shear-type frame structure. Four earthquake records in hard soil site are employed to execute nonlinear dynamic time history analysis. This work investigates the effects of storey displacement ductility and vibration period on the strength reduction factors for flexure-type structure, and compares the difference of strength reduction factors between flexure-type and shear-type structure. The results demonstrate that the strength reduction factors for flexure-type structure are above 40~ larger than those for flexure-type structure. In addition, storey displacement ductility and storey number are important influence factors to seismic strength reduction factors.
出处 《湘潭大学自然科学学报》 CAS 北大核心 2013年第1期56-62,共7页 Natural Science Journal of Xiangtan University
基金 湖南省自然科学基金项目(12JJ6047) 教育部博士点基金项目(20094301120001)
关键词 强度折减系数 多自由度体系 弯曲型结构 剪切型结构 strength reduction factor multi-degree-of-freedom systems flexure-type structure sheartype structure
  • 相关文献

参考文献15

  • 1翟长海,谢礼立.抗震规范应用强度折减系数的现状及分析[J].地震工程与工程振动,2006,26(2):1-7. 被引量:21
  • 2翟长海,谢礼立.结构抗震设计中的强度折减系数研究进展[J].哈尔滨工业大学学报,2007,39(8):1177-1184. 被引量:14
  • 3RIDDELL R,NEWMARK N M. Statistical analysis of the response of nonlinear systems subjected to earthquakes[R]. Structural Research Series, No. 468, Department of Civil Engineering, Urbana-Champaign, University of Illinois, 1979.
  • 4NASSAR A A, KRAWINKLER H. Seismic demands for SDOF and MDOF systems[R]. Report No. 95. The John A Blume Earthquake Engineering Center, Stanford University, 1991:12-45.
  • 5MIRANDA E. Sit e-dependent strength reduction on factors [J]. Journal of Structural Engineering, 1993, 119 (12) : 3 503- 3 519.
  • 6MIRANDA E. Strength reduction factors in performance design [C]. EERC-CUREe Symposium in Homer of Vitelmo V. Bertero. Berkeley, California, 1997 :45- 58.
  • 7翟长海,谢礼立.多自由度体系效应对强度折减系数的影响[J].工程力学,2006,23(11):33-37. 被引量:10
  • 8SANTA-ANA P R, MIRANDA E. strength reduction factors for multi-degree-of freedom systems [C]. 12WCEE Auckland, New- land, 2000.
  • 9MOGHADDAM H, MOHAMMADI R K. Ductility reduction factor of MDOF shear-building structures [J]. Journal of Earth- quake Engineering, 2001, 5(3): 425-440.
  • 10周靖,蔡健,方小丹.剪切型多自由度结构体系抗震延性折减系数[J].振动工程学报,2007,20(3):309-316. 被引量:3

二级参考文献109

  • 1杨媛,白绍良.从各国规范对比看我国抗震设计安全水准评价中的有关问题[J].重庆建筑大学学报,2000,22(z1):192-200. 被引量:26
  • 2周靖,蔡健,方小丹.钢筋混凝土结构抗震强度折减系数的谱分析[J].华南理工大学学报(自然科学版),2006,34(2):100-106. 被引量:11
  • 3高小旺 鲍霭斌.用概率方法确定抗震设防标准[J].建筑结构学报,1986,(2).
  • 4沈建文,蔡长青.地震危险性分析与抗震设防标准的确定[J].地震工程与工程振动,1997,17(2):27-36. 被引量:10
  • 5GBJ11-89.建筑抗震设计规范[S].[S].,..
  • 6GB5001-2001.建筑抗震设计规范[S].[S].,..
  • 7GB50011-2001,建筑抗震设计规范[S].北京:中国建筑工业出版社,2001.
  • 8Elana Vasseva,Georgio Franchioni,Evgency Krustev.Seismic design of R/C frame:An assessment of behavior factor and comparison of Eurocode 8 and Bulgarian Seismic Code.12WCEE[C],Aucland,New Zealand,2000,No.562.
  • 9江近仁.抗震设计强度折减系数及最大非线性位移估计[S].《建筑工程抗震性态设计通则》编制组,2003:123~154.
  • 10Uniform Building Code[S].International Conference of Building official,Whittier,1997:1234 ~ 1253.

共引文献38

同被引文献20

引证文献2

二级引证文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部