期刊文献+

季节变化对放牧藏系绵羊瘤胃发酵特性及产甲烷菌的影响 被引量:9

Effects of Seasonal Shift on Quantity of Rumen Methanogen and Fermentation of Grazing Tibetan Sheep
下载PDF
导出
摘要 在春、夏、秋和冬季分别随机选取3只随群放牧藏系绵羊,通过常规养分分析法和实时定量PCR技术,研究牧草养分的季节变化对瘤胃发酵特性及瘤胃产甲烷菌的影响。结果表明:①不同季节藏羊瘤胃液挥发性脂肪酸的生成量随季节而变化,但对瘤胃发酵模式没有影响,仍然呈乙酸发酵模式。夏季总挥发性脂肪酸、丙酸、丁酸和戊酸浓度极显著高于其他季节(P<0.01);冬季乙酸浓度和乙酸/丙酸极显著高于其他季节(P<0.01);夏季和秋季乙酸浓度差异不显著(P>0.05),但极显著高于春季(P<0.01);秋季丙酸浓度极显著高于冬季和春季(P<0.01);秋季乙酸/丙酸极显著高于春季和夏季(P<0.01),春季极显著高于夏季(P<0.01)。②瘤胃产甲烷菌质量浓度也随季节而变化,夏季瘤胃总产甲烷菌质量浓度极显著高于春季、冬季和秋季(P<0.01),秋、冬季节差异不显著(P>0.05),但极显著高于春季(P<0.01)。 In order to study the effects of seasonal shifted grass nutrition on fermentation characters and quantity of methanogen in rumens,grass samples and rumen content samples of three grazing Ti- betan sheep in each season were collected to analyze the grass nutrition and monitor the quantity change of methanogen in rumens by conventional methods and real time PCR. Results showed 1)the quantity of volatile fatty acids (VFA) in sheep rumen was changed with seasonal shift. The fermenta- tion model was not changed and remained acetate fermentation model in rumen. Contents of TVFA, propionate, butyrate and valerate in summer were significantly higher than that in other seasons(P〈0.01). The contents of acetate and acetate/propionate in winter were significantly higher than that in other seasons(P〈0. 01), the contents of acetate in summer was significantly higher than that in spring(P〈0.01), it was not significant different(P〉0.05)between summer and winter. The con- tents of acetate in autumn was significantly higher than that in winter and spring(P〈0.01). Acetate/propionate in autumn was significantly higher than that in spring and summer(P〈20.01), and Acetate/ Propionate in spring was significantly higher than that in summer(P〈0.01). 2)The quantity of methanogen in grazing Tibetan sheep rumen was changed with seasonal shift and it was significantly higher in summer than in others seasons(P〈0.01), the quantity of methanogen in autumn and winter were significantly higher than that in spring(P〈0.01), but there was no significant difference(P〉0.05)between autumn and winter.
出处 《西北农业学报》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2013年第2期1-6,共6页 Acta Agriculturae Boreali-occidentalis Sinica
基金 国家自然科学基金重点项目(30730069)
关键词 季节变化 藏系绵羊 REAL time-PCR VFA 产甲烷菌 Seasonal shift Tibetan Sheep Real-time PCR VFA Methanogen
  • 相关文献

参考文献17

  • 1Orpin C G, Mathiesen S D, Greenwood Y, et al. Seasonalchanges in the ruminal microflora of the high-arctic Sval-bard reindeer (Rangifertarandus platyrhynchus) [J]. Ap-pl Environ Microbiol, 1985,50 : 144-151.
  • 2Lucy C S, Paul N E, Graham E Ne,et aL 16S RibosomalDNA-Directed PCR Primers for Ruminal Methanogens andIdentification of Methanogens Colonising Young Lambs[J]. Anaerobe,2004,10 :277-285.
  • 3龙瑞军,董世魁,王元素,郭轶瑞,JPAGELLA.反刍动物采食量的概念与研究方法[J].草业学报,2003,12(5):8-17. 被引量:60
  • 4汤少勋,姜海林,周传社,谭支良.不同牧草品种对体外发酵产气特性的影响[J].草业学报,2005,14(3):72-77. 被引量:53
  • 5YANG Shixing(杨诗兴).Evaluation methods for nutritivevalue of feedstuff (饲料营养价值评定方法)[M]. Lanzhou:Gansu Republic Publishing Press, 1982 : 170-190 (in Chi-nese).
  • 6Zhou J,Bruns M A,Tiedje J M. DNA recovery from soils ofdiverse composition [J]. Appl Environ Microbiol,1996,62 :316-322.
  • 7淡瑞芳,龙瑞军,杨予海.瘤胃微生物总DNA快速提取法研究[J].家畜生态学报,2006,27(1):18-21. 被引量:10
  • 8Hobson P N, Mann S O,Summers R. Rumen micro-organ-isms in red deer,hill sheep and reindeer in the scottish high-lands [J]. Proc R Soc Edinb Nat Environ,1976,75(3) : 171-180.
  • 9Wolin M J , Miller T L,Stewart C S. Microbe-microbe inter-actions [M]//Hobson P N, Stewart C S. The Rumen Mi-crobial Ecosystem. New York : Blackie Academic &? Profes-sional ,1997:467-491.
  • 10Tokura M, Chagan I, Ushidaal. Phylogenetic studyof methanogens associated with rumen ciliates [J]. CurrMicrobiol,1999 ,39:123-128.

二级参考文献92

  • 1鲁剑巍,李小坤,陈防,鲁君明,梁友光.磷肥用量及氮磷钾配合施用对小米草产量的影响[J].草业学报,2004,13(6):69-74. 被引量:11
  • 2杨春华,李向林,张新全,刘芳,刘伟.秋季补播多花黑麦草对扁穗牛鞭草草地产量、质量和植物组成的影响[J].草业学报,2004,13(6):80-86. 被引量:34
  • 3INRA. Ruminant Nutrition: Recommended Allowances and Feed Tables[M]. Paris,France: INRA and John Libbey Eurotext, 1989.
  • 4Wahed R A, Owen E. Comparison of sheep and goats under stall-feeding conditions: Roughage intake and selection[J].Animal Production, 1986,42 : 89-95.
  • 5Wahed R A, Owen E, Naate M, et al. Feeding straw to small ruminants: Effect of amount offered on intake and selection of barley straw by goats and sheep[J]. Animal Production, 1990,51:283-289.
  • 6National Research Council. Predicting Feed Intake of Food-Producing Animals[M]. Washington D.C. , USA: National Academy of Sciences, 1986.
  • 7Varga O A, Harpster H W. Gut size and rate of passage[A]. In:Symposium: Intake by Feedlot Cattle[M]. Stillwater,Oklahoma, USA: Oklahoma State University,1995.85-95.
  • 8Weston R H, Poppi D P. Comparative aspects of food intake[A]. In: Hacker J B, Ternouth J H. The Nutrition of Herbivores[M]. Sydney, Australia : Academic Press, 1987.133-161.
  • 9Van Es A J H. Which information on feeds is most needed in practical livestock feeding? [A]. In:Robards G E, Packham R G. Feed Information and Animal Production[M]. Farnham Royal, Slough, UK: Commonwealth Agricultural Bureaux and Feed and International Network of Feed Information Centres, 1983. 115-118.
  • 10McDonald P, Edwards R A, Greenhalgh J F D, et al. Animal Nutrition[M]. Fifth Edition. Essex, UK: Longman Scientific and Technical, 1995.

共引文献118

同被引文献124

引证文献9

二级引证文献44

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部