期刊文献+

不同趋近动机强度积极情绪对认知控制的影响 被引量:31

The Effect of Low versus High Approach-Motivated Positive Affect on Cognitive Control
下载PDF
导出
摘要 情绪的动机维度模型认为,积极情绪对认知加工的影响受其趋近动机强度的调节,高、低趋近动机积极情绪对认知加工的影响不同。本研究运用情绪图片诱发被试高、低趋近动机积极情绪,采用停止信号任务和任务转换作业考察了不同趋近动机强度积极情绪对认知控制的影响。结果发现:(1)与中性条件相比,高趋近动机积极情绪促进了停止信号任务中Go任务和任务转换作业中重复任务的反应执行。(2)在停止信号任务中,相对于中性条件,低趋近动机积极情绪条件下的停止信号反应时显著缩短;在任务转换作业中,低趋近动机积极情绪条件下的反应时转换损失和错误率转换损失均显著降低,而高趋近动机积极情绪条件下的反应时转换损失显著增加。因此,积极情绪对认知控制的影响受其趋近动机强度的调节,即低趋近动机积极情绪增强认知灵活性,提高停止反应与任务转换的速度;而高趋近动机积极情绪增强认知稳定性,加快停止信号任务中Go任务和任务转换作业中重复任务的反应执行,增加了反应时转换损失。 The motivational dimensional model of affect, proposed by Gable and Harmon-Jones (2010), posits that approach motivational intensity of positive affect modulates the influence of positive affect on cognition. In line with this model, accumulating evidences have supported this hypothesis. Studies have found that low approach-motivated positive affect (e.g., serenity) broadens, whereas high approach-motivated positive affect (e.g., desire) narrows cognitive breadth, such as the breadth of attention, memory, and cognitive categorization. However, little is known about whether the influence of positive affect on cognitive control, which partly reflects the temporality of cognitive processes, is modulated by the approach motivational intensity of positive affect. Therefore, two experiments in this study were conducted to investigate this issue. In experiment 1, a modified stop-signal task was used to explore the influence of approach motivational intensity of positive affect on inhibition control. The stop signal task involved two concurrent tasks, a primary go task and a secondary stop task. The go task was a two-choice reaction time task that required participants to discriminate the location of black squares (2.4 cm × 2.4 cm) positing on the center of the left or right part of the screen. The stop task, which occurred pseudo-randomly and infrequently (25% of the total trials), involved presentation of a red circle (stop signal) that countermanded the go signal by instructing participants to inhibit their planned response to the go task on that trial. Ninety-one undergraduates were randomly assigned to the three conditions: low approach-motivated positive affect (31, 17 females), high approach-motivated positive affect (30, 16 females), and neutral (30, 16 females) conditions. One-way ANOVAs demonstrated that the effects of emotional pictures on response execution and inhibition were significant. Scheffe tests revealed that, relative to the neutral condition, response inhibition was faster in low approach-motivated positive affect condition, while response execution was faster in high approach-motivated positive affect condition. In experiment 2, we used typical numerical classification tasks to examine the influence of approach motivational intensity of positive affect on task switching. Eighty-four new undergraduates (48 females) were randomly assigned to three experimental conditions. Participants had to judge whether a digit (1~9, excluding 5) was smaller or larger than five (smaller–larger task) or whether it was odd or even (odd–even task). We used either a square or diamond frame with sides that were 4.8 cm in length as task cues to indicate the smaller–larger task or odd–even task, respectively. Repeated measures ANOVAs on reaction time and error rate showed that low approach-motivated positive affect facilitated switched task, while high approach-motivated positive affect facilitated repeated task. Results also indicated that low approach-motivated positive affect reduced reaction time and error switch costs, whereas high approach-motivated positive affect increased reaction time switch costs. In summary, this research suggests that low approach-motivated positive affect enhances cognitive flexibility, whereas high approach-motivated positive affect enhances cognitive stability. The current research extends previous work on cognitive breadth to cognitive control which partly reflects the temporality of cognitive processes. Taken together, this line of research suggests that the effects of positive affect on cognitive processes are modulated by its approach motivational intensity.
出处 《心理学报》 CSSCI CSCD 北大核心 2013年第5期546-555,共10页 Acta Psychologica Sinica
基金 国家自然科学基金项目(30970912) 教育部人文社会科学基金项目(11YJA190008) 陕西师范大学研究生创新基金项目(2011CXS020)资助
关键词 积极情绪 趋近动机 认知控制 停止信号任务 任务转换 positive affect approach motivation cognitive control stop signal task task switching
  • 相关文献

参考文献44

  • 1Briggs, K. E., & Martin, E H. (2009). Affective picture processing and motivational relevance: Arousal and valence effects on ERPs in an oddball task. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 72, 299-306.
  • 2Carver, C. S. (2003). Pleasure as a sign you can attend to something else: Placing positive feelings within a general model of affect. Cognition and Emotion, 17, 241-261.
  • 3Chiew, K. S., & Braver, T. S. (2011). Positive affect versus reward: Emotional and motivational influences on cognitive control. Frontiers in Psychology, 2, 279.
  • 4Compton, R. J., Wirtz, D., Pajoumand, G., Claus, E., & Heller,W. (2004). Association between positive affect and attentional shifting. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 28, 733-744.
  • 5Demanet, J., Liefooghe, B., Verbruggen, F. (2011). Valence, arousal, and cognitive control: A voluntary task-switching study. Frontiers in Psychology, 2, 336.
  • 6Dreisbach, G. (2006). How positive affect modulates cognitive control: The costs and benefits of reduced maintenance capability. Brain and Cognition, 60, 11-19.
  • 7Dreisbach, G., & Goschke, T. (2004). How positive affect modulates cognitive control: Reduced perseveration at the cost of increased distractibility. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 30, 343-353.
  • 8Fredrickson, B. L. (2001). The role of positive emotions in positive psychology: The-broaden-and-build theory of positive emotions. American Psychologist, 56, 218-226.
  • 9Fredrickson, B. L., & Branigan, C. (2005). Positive emotions broaden the scope of attention and thought-action repertoires. Cognition and Emotion, 19, 313-332.
  • 10Gable, P. A., & Harmon-Jones, E. (2008). Approach-motivated positive affect reduces breadth of attention. Psychological Science, 19, 476-482.

二级参考文献60

  • 1Bradley, M. M., & Lang, P. J. (2007). Emotion and motivation. In J. T. Cacioppo, L. G. Tassinary, & G. Berntson (Eds.), Handbook of Psychophysiology (3rd ed., pp. 581-607). New York: Cambridge University Press.
  • 2Briggs, K. E., & Martin, F. H. (2009). Affective picture processing and motivational relevance: Arousal and valence effects on ERPs in an oddball task. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 72, 299-306.
  • 3Carver, C. S., & Harmon-Jones, E. (2009). Anger is an approach-related affect: Evidence and implications. Psychological Bulletin, 135, 183-204.
  • 4Ekman, P. (2003). Emotions Revealed. New York: Times Books.
  • 5Franken, I. H. A., Van Strien, J. W., Bocanegra, B. R., & Huijding, J. (2011). The P3 event-related potential as an index of motivational relevance: A conditioning experiment. Journal of Psychophysiology, 25, 32-39.
  • 6Fredrickson, B. L. (2001). The role of positive emotions in positive psychology: The broaden and build theory of positive emotions. American Psychologist, 56, 218-226.
  • 7Fredrickson, B. L., & Branigan, C. (2005). Positive emotions broaden the scope of attention and thought-action repertoires. Cognition and Emotion, 19, 313-332.
  • 8Gable, E A., & Harmon-Jones, E. (2008a). Approach-motivated positive affect reduces breadth of attention. Psychological Science, 19, 476-482.
  • 9Gable, E A., & Harmon-Jones, E. (2008b). Relative left frontal activation to appetitive stimuli: Considering the role of individual differences. Psychophysiology, 45, 275-278.
  • 10Gable, P. A., & Harmon-Jones, E. (2010a). The motivational dimensional model of affect: Implications for breadth of attention, memory, and cognitive categorization. Emotion and Cognition, 24, 322-337.

共引文献110

同被引文献349

引证文献31

二级引证文献159

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部