期刊文献+

不同仪器检测尿密度方法的比较

Comparison of detection results of urine specific gravity analyzed by different apparatus
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探讨临床科室使用不同方法学原理的仪器测定尿密度的差异性。方法收集临床444份随机尿分别用AX-4280尿液分析仪和COBAS-U-411尿液干化学分析仪测定尿密度,并对结果进行统计学对比分析。结果当pH为6.5~7.5时,两种仪器检测结果差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);当pH<6.5时,两种仪器检测结果差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。当尿液中蛋白为阳性时,两种仪器检测结果差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。当尿液中糖为阳性时,两种仪器检测结果差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论临床不同仪器检测尿密度的结果具有差异性。 Objective To study the difference of urine specific gravity detected by apparatus utilizing different methodology principle. Methods 444 urine samples were examined with AX-4280 analyzer and COBAS-U-411 analy- zer, and the results were statistically compared. Results The mean values of urinary specific gravity were without statistical difference between the two analyzers(P〉0.05), when pH was 6.5-7.0, but with statistical difference (P〈0.05), when pH was less than 6.5. The mean values of urinary specific gravity were without statistical differ- ence(P〉0.05) in samples with positive detection result of glucose, but with statistical difference(P〈0.05) in sam- ples with positive detection result of protein. Conclusion There might be different detection result of urine specific gravity using different apparatus.
出处 《检验医学与临床》 CAS 2013年第9期1084-1085,共2页 Laboratory Medicine and Clinic
关键词 尿密度 AX-4280尿液分析仪 COBAS-U-411尿液干化学分析仪 urine specific gravity AX-4280 COBAS U-411
  • 相关文献

参考文献11

二级参考文献8

  • 1陈军,李乃义,樊笑霞.尿十联分析仪与手工检验结果的比较[J].上海医学检验杂志,1996,11(1):10-11. 被引量:7
  • 2丛玉隆 闫峰 等.折射仪测定尿比重影响因素探讨[J].中华医学检验杂志,1989,12(1):50-50.
  • 3车梅发.尿液渗量的调查[J].上海医学检验杂志,1996,11(4):195-195.
  • 4从玉隆 邓新业 等.尿液常规分析标准化的体会与建议[J].江西医学检验,2001,19:258-258.
  • 5魏明亮.尿液相对密度的测定[A].见:俞善丁.临床基础检验学[C].北京:人民卫生出版社,1997.168.
  • 6郭玉伟 刘金喜 潘新福.尿液比密三种方法的比较与评价[J].上海医学检验杂志,1996,11:43-43.
  • 7陈愈炯,温彦锋.基坑支护结构上的水土压力[J].岩土工程学报,1999,21(2):139-143. 被引量:66
  • 8朱忠勇.尿分析进展[J].中华医学检验杂志,1999,22(1):19-21. 被引量:40

共引文献60

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部