摘要
目的对比分析传统方法与小切口微创法治疗腋臭的疗效及预后。方法对2008年8月~2011年8月采用传统方法(传统组,n=45)或小切口微创法(微创组,n=45)治疗的90例腋臭患者的临床资料进行回顾性分析。结果传统组患者的有效率为93.33%,复发率为6.67%,并发症率为68.89%;微创组患者的有效率为91.11%,复发率为8.89%,并发症率为17.78%。两组患者的疗效和复发率差异无统计学意义(P>0.05),但是微创组患者的术后并发症发生率显著地小于传统组患者(P<0.05)。结论传统方法与小切口微创法治疗腋臭的疗效相当,但是小切口微创法治疗腋臭创伤小、恢复快、并发症少,可以作为治疗早期胃癌的首选方法。
Objective To compare and analyze the curative effect and prognosis of the treatment of bromihidrosis with traditional surgery or microsurgery methods. Methods Analyzed retrospectively the clinical data of the traditional surgery (traditional group,n--45)or microsurgery methods (microsurgery group,n=45) for treatment of 90 patients with bromihidrosis in our hospital from August 2008 to August 2011. Results The effect rate was 93.33%,recurrence rate was 6.67%,and complication rate was 68.89% in the traditional group.The effect rate was 91.11%,recurrence rate was 8.89%,and complication rate was 17.78% in the microsurgery group.There were no significant differences in curative effect and recurrence rate between two groups(P ~ 0.05).However,the complication rate in the microsurgery group was significant lower than that in the traditional group(P 〈 0.05). Conclusion The treatment of bromihidrosis with traditional group methods is the same of microsurgery methods.However,microsurgery methods for treatment of bromihidrosis has a lot of advantages,minimal invasion,early recovery and lower complication.It can be as preferred method to treat bromihidrosis.
出处
《中国医药科学》
2013年第9期195-196,198,共3页
China Medicine And Pharmacy
关键词
传统手术方法
小切口微创法
腋臭
疗效
预后
Traditional surgery method
Microsurgery method
Bromihidrosis
Curative effect
Prognosis