期刊文献+

脑胶质瘤术后放疗后复发和放射性脑坏死磁共振弥散张量成像鉴别 被引量:15

Distinction between brain glioma recurrence and radiation necrosis after postoperative radiotherapy using MR diffusion tensor imaging
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:评价磁共振弥散张量成像(DTI)对胶质瘤术后放疗后复发和放射性脑坏死的鉴别价值。方法:对35例脑胶质瘤术后放疗后疑似肿瘤复发者行常规MRI和DTI检查。在表观弥散系数(ADC)图及各相异性分数(FA)图上对应病变强化区、水肿区和对侧半球正常脑白质区(对照)选择感兴趣区,测量ADC值和FA值,计算病变强化区和水肿区标准化ADC比值和FA比值,行受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线分析。结果:经组织学检查及胶质瘤术后随访,确定胶质瘤复发20例、放射性脑坏死15例。肿瘤复发组病变强化区ADC比值(1.34±0.15)低于放射性脑坏死组(1.62±0.17)(t=5.162,P<0.001),FA比值(0.45±0.03)高于放射性脑坏死组(0.32±0.03)(t=12.686,P<0.001)。2组水肿区以上2指标差异无统计学意义。ROC曲线分析结果显示,以病变强化区ADC比值<1.65和(或)FA比值>0.36判断肿瘤复发时,DTI的诊断敏感性、特异性和准确性分别为85.0%(17/20)、86.7%(13/15)和85.7%(30/35)。结论:DTI对鉴别胶质瘤术后放疗后复发和放射性脑坏死有重要的应用价值。 Aim : To evaluate the value of MR diffusion tensor imaging(DTI) to distinguish brain glioma recurrent from radiation necrosis after postoperative radiotherapy. Methods: Thirty-five patients of brain glioma (20 true, 15 false) were examined by conventional MRI and DTI. Regions of interest (ROI) were manually drawn in the regions of contrast-enhancing lesion, close edema and the contra-lateral semi-sphere corresponding normal white matter on the ADC and FA maps, respectively. ADC and FA values of ROI were measured. Then the standardized ADC and FA ra- tios were calculated. The receiver operating characteristic curves were analyzed. Results: The mean ADC ratio (1.34 ± 0.15 ) in the contrast-enhancing lesions was significantly lower in patients with tumor recurrence compared with those with radiation necrosis (1. 62 ± O. 17 ) (t = 5. 162 ,P 〈 O. 001 ). The mean FA ratio(0.45 ± 0.03 )in the eontrast-enhaneing lesions was significantly higher in patients with tumor recurrence compared with those with radiation necrosis (0.32 ± O. 03 ) (t = 12. 686, P 〈 0.001 ). Neither the mean ADC nor FA ratio in edema had statistical difference between the two groups. Tumor recurrence was suggested when either ADC ratio 〈 1.65 or/and FA ratio 〉 O. 36 according to ROC curve analysis of contrast-enhancing lesions, and the diagnostic sensitivity, specificity and ac- curacy for recurrent tumor of DTI were 85.0% , 86.7 % and 85.7%. Conclusion : MR DTI examination is valuable to distinguish brain glioma recurrence from radiation necrosis.
出处 《郑州大学学报(医学版)》 CAS 北大核心 2013年第3期362-365,共4页 Journal of Zhengzhou University(Medical Sciences)
基金 河南省卫生科技攻关计划基金资助项目2011020142 201003101
关键词 磁共振弥散张量成像 肿瘤复发 脑胶质瘤 鉴别 MR diffusion tensor imaging neoplasm recurrence brain glioma distinguish
  • 相关文献

参考文献11

  • 1Jain R, Scarpace LM,Ellika S,et aL Imaging response cridiffusion weighted imaging as an imaging biomarker[ J]. JNeurooncol,2010,96(3 ) :423.
  • 2徐俊玲,李永丽,连建敏,窦社伟,吴慧,冯敢生.二维氢质子磁共振波谱分析鉴别胶质瘤术后复发和放射性脑损伤[J].中国医学影像技术,2010,26(4):639-642. 被引量:14
  • 3Xu JL,Shi DP,Dou SW,et al. Distinction between post-operative recurrent glioma and delayed radiation injury u-sing MR perfusion weighted imaging [ J ]. J Med ImagingRadiat Oncol, 2011, 55(6) :587.
  • 4Hein PA, Eskey CJ,Dunn JF,et al. Diffusion weightedimaging in the follow-up of treated high-grad gliomas :tumor recurrence versus radiation injury [ J ]. Am J Neuro-radiol, 2004,25(1) :201.
  • 5Zhou XJ, Leeds NE, Kumar AJ, et al. Differentiation oftumor recurrence from treatment-induced necrosis usingquantitative diffusion MRI [ J ] . Proc Inti Soc Mag ResonMed, 2010,9(3) :726.
  • 6Tung GA, Evangelista P, Rogg JM, et al. Diffusion-weightedMR imaging of rim-enhancing brain masses : is markedly de-creased water diffusion specific for brain abcess. [J]. AJR,2001,177(3):709.
  • 7Biousse V, Newman NJ, Hunter SB, et al. Diffusion weightedimaging in radiation necrosis[J]. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychi-atry, 2003,74(3):382.
  • 8Sundgren PC, Fan XY, Weybright P,et al. Differentiationof recurrent brain tumor versus radiation injury using diffu-sion tensor imaging in patients with new contrast-enhancinglesions[ J]. Magn Reson Imaging,2006,24(9) :1131.
  • 9Beppu T,Inoue T,Shibata Y, et al. Measurement of frac-tional anisotropy using diffusion tensor MRI in supratentori-al astrocytic tumors[ J] . J Neurooncol, 2003 ,63(2) ; 109.
  • 10Sinha S, B as tin ME, Whittle IR, et al. Diffusion tensorMR imaging of high-grade cerebral gliomas [ J ]. Am JNeuroradiol, 2002,23(4) :520.

二级参考文献10

  • 1Schlemmer HP,Bachert P,Herfarth KK,et al.Proton MR spectroscopic evaluation of suspicious brain lesions after stereotactic radiotherapy.AJNR Am J Neuroradiol,2001,22(7):1361-1324.
  • 2Lichy MP,Plathow C,Schulz-Ertner D,et al.Follow-up gliomas after radiotherapy:1H MR spectroscopic imaging for increasing diagnostic accuracy.Neuroradiology,2005,47(11):826-834.
  • 3Plotkin M,Eisenacher J,Bruhn H,et al.123I-IMT SPECT and ^1H MR-spectroscopy at 3.0 T in the differential diagnosis of recurrent or residualgliom as:a comparative study.J Neurooncol,2004,70(1):49-58.
  • 4McKnight TR,von dem Bussche MH,Vigneron DB,et al.Histopathological validation of a three-dimensional magnetic resonance spectroscopy index as a predictor of tumor presence.J Neurosurg,2002,97(4):794-802.
  • 5Rutkowski T,Tornawski R,Sokol M,et al.^1H-MR spectroscopy of normal brain tissue before and after postoperative radiotherapy because of primary brain tumors.Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys,2003,56(5):1381-1389.
  • 6Weybright P,Sundgren PC,Maly P,et al.Differentiation between brain tumor recurrence and radiation injury using MR spectroscopy.AJR Am J Roentgenol,2005,185(6):1471-1476.
  • 7McGirt MJ,Woodworth GF,Coon AL,et al.Independent predictors of morbidity after imaging guided stereotactic brain biopsy:a risk assessment of 270 cases.J Neurosurg,2005,102(5):897-901.
  • 8Zeng QS,Li CF,Zhang K,et al.Multivoxel 3D proton MR spectroscopy in the distinction of recurrent glioma from radiation injury.J Neurooncol,2007,84(1):63-69.
  • 9Rutkowski T,Tarnawski R,Sokol M,et al.^1H-MR spectroscopy of normal brain tissue before and after postoperative radiotherapy because of primary brain tumors.Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys,2003,56(5):1381-1389.
  • 10王丽君,徐克,郎志谨.氢质子磁共振波谱诊断60例脑胶质瘤[J].中国医学影像技术,2008,24(10):1565-1568. 被引量:7

共引文献13

同被引文献115

  • 1Forsyth PA, Petrov E, Mahallati H, et al. Prospective study ofpostoperative magnetic resonance imaging in patients with malignantgliomas[J]. J Clin Oncol, 1997, 15(5): 2076-2081.
  • 2Albert FK,Forsting M, Sartor K, et al. Early postoperative magneticresonajice imaging after resection of malignant glioma: objectiveevaluation of residual tumor and its influence on regrowth andprognosis[J]. Neurosurgery, 1994,34(1): 45-60.
  • 3Jeffries, B.F, Kishore PR,Singh KS, et al. Contrast enhancement inthe postoperative brain[J]. Radiology, 1981, 139(2): 409-413.
  • 4Di Costanzo A, Soarabino T,Trojsi Fi,et al. Multiparametric 3T MRapproach to the assessment of cerebral gliomas: tumor extent andmalignancy[J]. Neuroradiology, 2006, 48(9): 622-631.
  • 5Arvinda HR, Kesavadas C, Sarma PS, et al. Glioma grading:sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values ofdiffusion and perfusion imaging[J]. J Neurooncol, 2009, 94(1): 87-96.
  • 6Simon D, Fritzsche KH, Thieke C, et al. Diffusion-weightedimaging-based probabilistic segmentation of high-and low-proliferative areas in high-grade gliomas[J]. Cancer Imaging, 2012,12: 89-99.
  • 7Server A, Kulle B, Gadmar 0B,et al. Measurements of diagnosticexamination performance using quantitative apparent diffusioncoefficient and proton MR spectroscopic imaging in the preoperativeevaluation of tumor grade in cerebral gliomas[J]. Eur J Radiol, 2011,80(2): 462-470.
  • 8Chau V,Synnes A,Grunau RE. Abnormal brain maturation in preterm neonates associated with adverse developmental outcomes[J].NEUROLOGY,2013,(24):2082-2089.
  • 9Geng X,Gouttard S,Sharma A. Quantitative tract-based white matter development from birth to age 2years[J].NEUROIMAGE,2012,(03):542-557.
  • 10Yoshida S,Oishi K,Faria AV. Diffusion tensor imaging of normal brain development[J].Pediatric Radiology,2013,(01):15-27.

引证文献15

二级引证文献44

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部