期刊文献+

不同评估方法得出的五氯酚的PNEC值的比较研究 被引量:9

Comparison of Aquatic Predicted No-Effect Concentrations ( PNECs ) for Pentachlorophenol Derived from Different Assessment Approaches
原文传递
导出
摘要 预测的无效应浓度(PNEC)是进行风险污染物水生态安全管理的重要依据,一直是水环境风险管理者研究的热点.为了比较不同评估方法对PNEC计算结果的影响,以五氯酚(PCP)的PNEC值评估为例,使用点评估、统计评估和区间评估进行PCP的PNEC值研究,并对这几种方法进行比较,同时对控制PNEC值大小的主要影响因素进行了分析.结果表明,由点评估通过急慢性毒性数据和评估因子获得的PCP的PNEC值分别为0.420μg·L-1和0.500μg·L-1,相差不大;由统计评估的probit和logit单位法获得的PCP的PNEC值分别为10.1μg·L-1和8.10μg·L-1;由区间评估获得的PNEC-L95%和PNEC-L50%的值分别为6.00μg·L-1和11.8μg·L-1,可见由统计评估和区间评估获得的PNEC值比较接近,而点评估获得的PNEC值比其它两种方法低一到两个数量级;并且毒性数据类型和统计模型对毒性数据量丰富的PCP的PNEC值的得出影响不大.因此统计评估和区间评估可以被选为数据量较丰富的化合物如PCP的PNEC值的计算方法,其结果比点评估计算出的PNEC值更具有可信度. Predicted no-effect concentration(PNEC) is the key for ecological risk assessment and has become a focus of the study.Generally,extrapolation was used to derive PNEC values by different evaluation approaches according to results of single species toxicity test.However,PNEC values were different for the same toxicity data for the same chemicals if extrapolation methods were different.To evaluate PNEC values derived by different assessment methods,PNEC values of pentachlorophenol(PCP) were calculated using three different approaches,i.e.point estimation,statistical evaluation as well as interval evaluation.At the same time,the main factors controlling PNEC values were analyzed.The results showed that PNEC values for PCP by different assessment factors were 0.420 μg.L-1 for acute toxicity data and 0.500 μg.L-1 for chronic toxicity data,respectively.The PNEC values for PCP by statistical evaluation were 10.1 μg.L-1 for probit unit and 8.10 μg.L-1 for logit unit.The values derived by interval evaluation were 6.00 μg.L-1 for PNEC-L95%and 11.8 μg.L-1for PNEC-L50%,respectively.PNECs obtained by the point estimation were the lowest and lower one order of magnitude than the PNEC values obtained by the other two methods.The PNEC values derived by the statistical assessment and interval evaluation were very similar.In addition,toxicity data type and statistical models have little effect on PNEC value for PCP with a great body of toxicity data.The results indicated that statistical evaluation and interval evaluation methods should be selected to derive PNEC values for well-studied substances like PCP,while point estimation should be used in preliminary screening assessment of chemicals to determine whether the effect is of concern.
出处 《环境科学》 EI CAS CSCD 北大核心 2013年第6期2335-2343,共9页 Environmental Science
基金 上海市重点学科项目(S30109) 上海市优秀青年基金项目(shu10040)
关键词 五氯酚 点评估 统计评估 区间评估 预测的无效应浓度 pentachlorophenol point estimate statistical evaluation interval evaluation predicted no effect concentration(PNEC)
  • 相关文献

参考文献32

  • 1Caldwell D J, Mastrocco F, Nowak E, et al.An assessment ofpotential exposure and risk from estrogens in drinking water [ J].Environmental Health Perspectives, 2010, 118(3):338-344.
  • 2Hayashi T I,Kashiwagi N.A Bayesian approach to probabilisticecological risk assessment:risk comparison of nine toxicsubstances in Tokyo surface waters [ J].Environmental Scienceand Pollution Research, 2011, 18(3 ):365-375.
  • 3Straub J 0, Gysel D,Kastl U, et al.Environmental riskassessment for ancillary substances in biotechnological productionof pharmaceuticals [ J].Environmental Toxicology andChemistry, 2012, 31(3):681-687.
  • 4Mochida K, Amano H, Ito K, et al.Species sensitivitydistribution approach to primary risk analysis of the metalpyrithione photodegradation product, 2,2,-dipyridyldisulfide inthe Inland Sea and induction of notochord undulation in fishembryos [ J].Aquatic Toxicology, 2012,118-119:152-163.
  • 5Hoke R A, Bouchelle L D,Ferrell B D, ef al.Comparativeacute freshwater hazard assessment and preliminary PNECdevelopment for eight fluorinated aqids [ J].Chemosphere,2012,87(7):725-733.
  • 6金小伟,雷炳莉,许宜平,查金苗,王子健.水生态基准方法学概述及建立我国水生态基准的探讨[J].生态毒理学报,2009,4(5):609-616. 被引量:52
  • 7Jin X W,Zha J M, Xu Y P, et al.Derivation of predicted noeffect concentrations(PNEC) for 2 , 4,6-trichlorophenol basedon Chinese resident species[ J].Chemosphere,2012,86(1 ):17-23.
  • 8Jin X W, Zha J M, Xu Y P, et al.Derivation of aquaticpredicted no-effect concentration(PNEC ) for 2, 4-dichlorophenol:Comparing native species data with non-nativespecies data[ J].Chemosphere, 2011,84(10):1506-1511.
  • 9De Laender F, De Schamphelaere K A C , Vanrolleghem P A, eial.Comparing ecotoxicological effect concentrations of chemicalsestablished in multi-species vs.single-species toxicity testsystems[ J].Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety, 2009,72¢2):310-315.
  • 10Sadiq R , Husain T, Bose N , et al.Distribution of heavy metalsin sediment pore water due to offshore discharges:an ecologicalrisk assessment[ J].Environmental Modelling & Software,2003,18(5):451-461.

二级参考文献48

共引文献152

同被引文献155

引证文献9

二级引证文献43

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部