摘要
目的比较替吉奥胶囊(S-1)联合多西他赛与~FQLFOX4方案治疗晚期胃癌的临床疗效及安全性。方法将75例初治和复治的晚期胃癌患者随机分为实验组和时照组。窦验鲤37倒,应用替吉奥胶囊80mg/m2,口服,早晚餐后各1次,第1-14天;多西他赛38mg/m2,第1、8天,静脉滴注lh。21d为l今化疗周期,至少完成2个周期。对照组38例应用FOLFOX4方案,即;奥沙利铂85mg/m。静脉注射2h,第1天;亚叶酸钙200mg/m2静脉滴注,第1、2天;5一氟脲嘧啶(5.Fu)400mg/m2,静脉推注,第l奏;5-Fu600mg/m2,持续静脉滴注22h,第1、2天。14d为1个周期,至少完成2个周期。评价两组的客观疗效及不良反应。结果实验纽和对照组的有效率分别为56.76%、47.37%,两组比较差异无统计学意篡(P〉0.05)。实验组和对照组的腹泻及恶心、呕吐的发生率均较对照组低,差异有统计学意义(P均〈0.05)。其他毒副作用比较差异无统计学意义(P均〉0.05)。结论替吉奥联合多西他赛与FOLFOX方案近期疗效秃明显差异,但替吉奥联合多西他赛毒副作用较轻,对年劳体弱者可能重逢合.
Objective To compare the curative efficacy and safety of the combination of S-1 and docetaxel and FOLFOX4 in the treatment of pgtients with advanced gastic carcinoma. Methods Seven- ty-five patients with advanced gastric carcinoma ware group(37 cases) were treated with the combination of S-1 c covered 3 weeks. Control group were treated with FOLFOX4 divided into two groups. Experimental and docetaxel, one treatment cycle therapy, 14 days as a cycle. The efficacy and toxicity were evaluated after 2 cyeles. Results The overall effective rate control group was 56. 76% and 47.37% respectively, There was no significant of experimental group and difference between the two groups (P〉0.05 ): The main adverse reactions included myelo-depression, nausea, vomiting and diarrhea. Conclusions Two groups have similar effects in the treatment of advanced gastric carcinoma, and the toxicity of the regi- ment of S-1 combined with docetaxel is mild and tolerable.
出处
《中国实用医刊》
2013年第11期40-42,共3页
Chinese Journal of Practical Medicine