期刊文献+

人格素质倾向还是职业决策倾向:免费师范生学习动机的特点及其发展研究 被引量:10

Personality or Professional Identity:The Development Research on Learning Motivation of Tuition-free Normal Education Students
原文传递
导出
摘要 本研究分别对华中师范大学183名免费师范生和160名非师范生进行两次问卷调查,以探查两类学生的人格、职业认同及学习动机的特点与差异。首次调查显示,免费师范生与非师范生的人格、内部学习动机没有显著差异,但其外部学习动机和职业认同都显著低于非师范生。半年追踪调查表明,两类学生的学习动机与职业认同各维度都没有随时间显著变化。各年级的内部学习动机没有显著差异,而外部学习动机随着年级的升高显著降低,职业认同随年级显著升高,但是大四又有下降趋势。研究还发现,相较于非师范生,免费师范生的职业认同与内部学习动机关系更加密切。此外,本研究还根据免费师范生的学习动机和职业认同特点,对免费师范生教育提出了一些建议。 We investigated 183 tuition-free normal students and 160 non-normal students from CCNU for twice to compare the characteristics and differences of personality, professional identity and learning ability between the two kinds of students. The first investigation showed that there were no differences between their personality and internal learning motivation. How- ever, the external learning motivation and professional identity of tuition-free normal students were lower than the non-normal students significantly. The second investigation was conducted half a year later. There were no significant changes of all di- mensions of learning motivation and professional identity over time for both tuition-free normal and non-normal students. From the perspective of grades, there were no significant differences between their internal learning motivations. But their external learning motivations were reduced with the grades. And their professional identity increased along with the grades, but senior was in downturn. Besides, compared with the non-normal, the relationship of professional identity and internal learning motivation were closer for free normal students. At last, we put forward some suggestions for free normal education according to the characteristics of their learning motivation and professional identity.
出处 《教师教育研究》 CSSCI 北大核心 2013年第3期72-78,共7页 Teacher Education Research
基金 华中师范大学教学研究项目(201103) 华中师范大学心理学高等学校特色专业建设项目(201203)
关键词 免费师范生 非师范生 人格 职业认同 学习动机 tuition-free normal students non-normal students personality professional identity learning motivation
  • 相关文献

参考文献11

  • 1Deci, E. L. Intrinsic motivation, extrinsic reinforcement, and inequity [ J ]. Journal of Personality and Social Psy- chology, 1972 (22): 113-120.
  • 2Costa, P. T. & McCrae, R. R. The NEO-PI/NEO-FFI Manual Supplement [ M ]. Odessa, FL: Psychological As- sessment Resources, 1959.
  • 3姚若松,梁乐瑶.大五人格量表简化版(NEO-FFI)在大学生人群的应用分析[J].中国临床心理学杂志,2010,18(4):457-459. 被引量:175
  • 4Black, A. E. & Deci, E. L. The effects of instructors' au- tonomy support and students' autonomous motivation on learning organic chemistry: A self-determination theory per- spective [ J ]. Science Education, 2000, 84 (6) : 740 - 756.
  • 5钟贞明,李冬梅.免费与非免费师范生学习动机强度的比较研究[J].心理研究,2010,3(2):90-92. 被引量:18
  • 6王丹丹,盖笑松.免费与非免费师范生学习动机强度的发展趋势[J].心理研究,2010,3(2):87-89. 被引量:7
  • 7Moore, M. & Hofman, J. E. Professional identity in in- stitutions of higher learning in Israel [ J ]. Higher Educa- tion, 1998 (1) : 69 - 79.
  • 8薄艳玲.师范生教师职业认同影响因素实证研究[J].湖南第一师范学报,2009,9(3):51-54. 被引量:30
  • 9Samuel, M. & Srephens, D. Critical dialogues with self: Developing teacher identities and roles-a case study of South Africa [ J ]. International Journal of Educational Research, 2000 (33) : 475 -491.
  • 10Mawhinney, H. & Xu, F. Restructuring the Identity of foreign-trained teachers in Ontario schools [ J ]. TESOL Quarterly, 1997 (31): 632 -639.

二级参考文献19

  • 1魏淑华,山显光.国外教师职业认同的研究现状[J].外国教育研究,2005,32(3):15-17. 被引量:97
  • 2宋广文,魏淑华.影响教师职业认同的相关因素分析[J].心理发展与教育,2006,22(1):80-86. 被引量:291
  • 3郑猛.3.4万名师范生免费上大学.中国税务报.2009.9.7.第2版.
  • 4Costa PT, MeCrae RR. The NEO personality inventory manual. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources,1985.
  • 5Costa PT, McCrae RR. The NEO-PI/NEO-FFI Manual suppiement. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources, 1989.
  • 6Costa PT, McCrae RR. NEO-PI-R professional manual. Revised NEO Personality Inventory (NEO-PIR) and NEO Five Factor Inventory (NEO-FFI). Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources, 1992.
  • 7Holden RR, Fekken GC. The NEO five factor inventory in a Canadian context: Psychometric properties for a sample of university women. Personality and Individual Differences, 1994, 17:441-444.
  • 8Egan V, Deary I, Austin E. The NEO-FFI: Emerging British norms and an item-level analysis suggest N, A and Care more rehable than O and E. Personality and Individual Differences, 2000, 29:907-920.
  • 9Schmitz N, Hartkamp N, Baldini C, Rollnik J, Tress W. Psychometric properties of the German version of the NEO- FFI in psychosomatic outpatients. Personality and Individual Differences, 2001, 31:713-722.
  • 10Hrebickova M, Urbanek T, Cermak I, Szarota P, Fickova E, et al. The NEO five-factor inventory in Czech, Polish, and Slovak contexts. In McCrae RR Allik R. The Five-Factor Model of personality across cultures. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 2002:53-78.

共引文献223

同被引文献151

引证文献10

二级引证文献16

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部