期刊文献+

Customer! The Forgotten Stakeholder

Customer! The Forgotten Stakeholder
下载PDF
导出
摘要 During last two decades a shift in marketing, corporate strategy, organizational, and market dynamics has been recorded. A series of corporate scandals like ENRON and others has shown that corporations have a significant impact on a number of stakeholders and particularly customers. The notion that the customers can shift from one product or service provider to the other may not be as valid as some theories suggest. The markets are not perfect mechanisms and customers are not rational decision makers. Although marketing has introduced the corporate culture--the customer-centric approach, the results are not as positive as they should be. The paper shows that marketing and corporate governance systems have many common elements and in fact they can be complementary in practice and theory. To establish the connection-correlation between them, the author is going to review the literature from both disciplines. As a next step, an analysis of impact of the customer as a party that has an interest in the firm is going to take place. Finally, two examples of this impact will depict the importance of a change in scope----goal, strategy, and practices used by both disciplines in achieving the firm's mission and goals. The author shows that both can be benefit from the integration of mechanisms, principles, and practices used by the marketing and corporate governance. The paper is the first step to create a theoretical convergence framework for these disciplines that seem completely separate. Marketing and corporate governance specialists and theorists may design a more comprehensive and holistic approach to customer that is more customer friendly, more long term and establishes a more successful and value creation (for both the customer and the corporation) relationship.
出处 《Chinese Business Review》 2013年第2期104-112,共9页 中国经济评论(英文版)
关键词 corporate governance MARKETING CUSTOMER 利益相关者 客户 企业文化 市场营销 遗忘 市场机制 市场动态 文件显示
  • 相关文献

参考文献29

  • 1Barney, J. B., & Hesterly, W. S. (1996). Organizational economics: Understanding the relationship between organizations and economic analysis. In S. R. Clegg, C. Hardy, & W. R. Nord (Eds.), Handbook of organization studies. Thousand Oaks, c.A.:Sage Publications Ltd.
  • 2Bartles, R. (1968). The general theory of marketing. Journal of Marketing, 32, 29-33.
  • 3Davis, G. F. (1991). Agents without principles? The spread of the poison pill through the intercorporate network. Administrative Science Quarterly, 36(4),583-613.
  • 4Donaldson, T., & Preston, L. (1995). The stakeholder theory of the modem corporation: Concepts, evidence and implications. Academy of Management Review, 20, 65-91.
  • 5Drucker, P. (2001). The essential Drucker. N.Y.: HarperCollins Publisher.
  • 6Eisenhardt, K. M. (1988). Agency-and institutional-theory explanations: The case of retail sales compensation. Academy of Management Journal, 31(3),488-511.
  • 7Eisenhardt, K. M. (1989). Agency theory: An assessment and review. Academy of Management Review, 14(1),57-74.
  • 8Fama, E. F. (1980). Agency problems and the theory of the firm. Journal of Political Economy, 88(2),288-307.
  • 9Fama, E., & Jensen, M. (1983). Separation of ownership and control. Journal of Law and Economics, 26, 301-325.
  • 10Feder, B. (2002). Worldcom's collapse: The customers; Many think service won't decline further. Retrieved from http://www.nytimes.com/2002/07/22/us/worldcom-s-collapse-the-customers-many-think-service-won-t-decline-further.html? pagewanted=all&src=pm.

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部