期刊文献+

75例大肠癌骨转移预后影响因素的回顾性分析 被引量:9

Prognostic factors of large bowel carcinoma with bony metastasis:a retrospetive analysis of 75 cases
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探讨75例大肠癌骨转移患者的临床特征及其相关的预后影响因素。方法以该院2002年3月-2012年2月间诊治的75例大肠癌骨转移患者为研究对象,对其临床资料进行回顾性分析。结果大肠癌确诊后,3年生存率为49.4%,中位生存期为(32.6±2.8)个月,大肠癌骨转移确诊后,3年生存率为26.8%,中位生存期为(11.3±3.2)个月。单因素分析发现:大肠癌骨转移时血清ALP≥150 U.L-1、伴有淋巴结转移、伴有其他脏器转移以及骨转移灶多发对大肠癌骨转移的预后有影响,对上述4项危险因素进行Logistic回归分析,发现骨转移时ALP≥150 U.L-1和骨转移时伴有其他脏器转移是影响大肠癌骨转移预后的独立危险因素。结论大肠癌骨转移时ALP水平及骨转移时伴有其他脏器转移是影响其预后生存率的独立危险因素,对于判断预后、指导术后治疗及制订随访方案具有重要作用。 Objective To investigate the clinical features and associated prognostic factors of large bowel carcinoma with bony metastasis in 75 patients. Methods We made a retrospective analysis on the clinical data of 75 patients with large bowel carcinoma with bony metastasis diagnosed and treated in our hospital from March 2002 to February 2012. Results After diagnosis of large bowel carcinoma,the 3-year survival rate was 49.4% , with a median survival time ( 32.6 ± 2.8 ) months, and after diagnosis of bony metastasis, the 3-year survival rate was 26.8% , with a median survival time( 11.3 ± 3.2)months. Univariate analysis showed when bony metastasis occurred, the serum ALP〉 150 U . L-1, accompanied by lymph node metastasis, other organ metastasis and multiple bone metastases, which would made a difference on the prognosis of large bowel carcinoma with bony metastasis, and the Logistic regression analysis on the above four risk factors showed that the serum ALP levels and accompanied other organ metastasis were independent risk factors for the prognosis of large bowel carcinoma with bony metastasis. Conclusion The ALP levels and accompanied other organ metastasis are independent risk factors for the prognosis of large bowel carcinoma with bony metastasis which have an important role for judging prognosis, guiding treatment and formulating the follow-up program.
出处 《安徽医药》 CAS 2013年第5期806-807,共2页 Anhui Medical and Pharmaceutical Journal
关键词 大肠癌 骨转移 预后 危险因素 large bowel carcinoma bony metastasis prognosis risk factors
  • 相关文献

参考文献10

  • 1Jemal A,Bray F,Center MM,et al.Global cancer statistics[J].CA Cancer J Clin,2011,61(2):69-90.
  • 2欧传活,吴建语,黄伶茜,文军程.XELOX方案与FOLFOX方案治疗101例晚期大肠癌的临床观察[J].中国医院用药评价与分析,2011,11(2):166-168. 被引量:10
  • 3范晓莉.恶性肿瘤骨转移诊断与治疗进展[J].临床合理用药杂志,2009,2(12):92-94. 被引量:6
  • 4Akerman M,Domanski HA,Jonsson K.Bone metastases[J].Monogr Clin Cytol,2010,19:75-80.
  • 5胡文军,叶明明,孙翠玲,周俭,徐晓宇.卡培他滨联合奥沙利铂治疗复发性大肠癌[J].安徽医药,2010,14(10):1209-1210. 被引量:12
  • 6Cassidy J,Saltz LB,Giantonio BJ,et al.Effect of bevacizumab in older patients with metastatic colorectal cancer:pooled analysis of four randomized studies[J].Cancer Res Clin Oncol,2010,136(5):737-743.
  • 7Elgazzar AH,Kazem N.Metastatic bone disease:evaluation by functional imaging in correlation with morphologic modalities[J].Gulf J Oncolog,2009,1(5):9-21.
  • 8Blum M,Suzuki A,Ajani JA.A comprehensive review of S-1 in the treatment of advanced gastric adenocarcinoma[J].Future Oncol,2011,7(6):715 -726.
  • 9杨震,李薇,黄忠连,陈振东.替吉奥单药治疗老年转移性结直肠癌的临床观察[J].安徽医药,2011,15(10):1293-1294. 被引量:10
  • 10Moosmann N,Von Weikersthal LF,Vehling-Kaiser U,et al.Cetuximab Plus Capecitabine and Irinotecan Compared With Cetuximab Plus Capecitabine and Oxaliplatin As First-Line Treatment for Patients With Metastatic Colorectal Cancer:AIO KRK-0104-A Randomized Trial of the German AIO CRC Study Group[J].J Clin Oncol,2011,29(8):1050-1058.

二级参考文献24

  • 1杨林,王金万.结直肠癌内科治疗进展[J].癌症进展,2007,5(2):143-150. 被引量:7
  • 2刘蒲香,刘奇.新编肿瘤临床内科治疗学[M].济南:山东科学技术出版社,2008:118-9.
  • 3刘新春,程玉峰.实用抗肿瘤药物治疗学[M].北京:人民卫生出版社,2006:631.
  • 4李进.复发转移性结直肠癌药物治疗进展.中国临床肿瘤学教育专辑[M].北京:中国协和医科大学出版社,2008:361-5.
  • 5安永恒,丁爱萍.肿瘤合理用药[M].北京:人民卫生出版社,2007:239-40.
  • 6曲智锋,冯笑山,高社干,王战会,单探幽,张洛,韩晶.奥沙利铂联合卡培他滨治疗晚期胃癌临床疗效观察[J].福建医药杂志,2007,29(4):41-43. 被引量:5
  • 7Cassidy J,Twelves C, Van Cutsem E,et al. First-line oral capecitabine therapy in metastatic colorectal cancer: a favorable safety profile compared with intravenous 5- fluorouracil/leucovorin [ J ] . Ann Oncol, 2002, 13 ( 4 ) : 566.
  • 8Shiroiwa T, Fukuda T, Shimozuma K, et al. Costeffectiveness analysis of capecitabine compared with bolus 5-fluorouracil/l-leucovorin for the adjuvat treatment of colon cancer in Japan [ J ].Pharmacoeconomics, 2009,27 (7) :597.
  • 9Goldberg RM,Sargent DJ,Morton RF,et al.A Randomized controlled trial of fluorouracil plus leucovorin,irinotecan,and oxaliplatin combinations in patients with previously untreated metastatic colorectal cancer[J].J Clin Oncol,2004,22(1):23-30.
  • 10Lee JL,Kang YK,Kang HJ,et al.A randomised multicentre phase II trial of capecitabine vs S-1 as first-line treatment in elderly patients with metastatic or recurrent unresectable gastric cancer[J].Br J Cancer,2008,99(4):584-90.

共引文献32

同被引文献68

引证文献9

二级引证文献44

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部