期刊文献+

高中学校特色发展的优势与限度 被引量:2

The Strengths and Limits of the Characteristics Development of High School
原文传递
导出
摘要 高中学校特色发展是高中的个性化生存之道。由于其所处的阶段和所面临的教育竞争境遇,高中学校的特色发展既有其优势,也有其限制。高中学校可以选拔生源,但是面临高利害考试的限制;高中学校开发课程具有规模优势,但是面临学生学习时间紧张的限制;高中教师具有群体合作优势,但是面临单兵竞争的限制。高中学校特色发展不是一个单向度的教育努力过程,时刻面临来自另外向度的限制,这给高中学校特色发展带来了实践的复杂性和理论研究的空间。 Characteristic development is a personalized way to survive for high schools. Not only have the high school their advantages, but also their limitations because of their stages and facing competition in the process to pursue characteristic development. High schools have the right to select students, but face the limitations of high-stake examination; high schools provide curriculum development with scale advantages, but face the restrictions of student lack of learning time; teacher group has the professional strength, but face the shortcomings of single teaching. Therefore, characteristics development of high schools is not a one- dimensional educational effort, always facing the restriction from another dimension, which brings complexity of the practice and space of theoretical studies to characteristic development of high schools.
作者 秦玉友
出处 《教育发展研究》 CSSCI 北大核心 2013年第10期1-5,共5页 Research in Educational Development
基金 教育部哲学社会科学研究重大课题攻关项目"普通高中多样化发展研究"(10JZD0037)的阶段性成果
关键词 高中学校 特色发展 发展空间 限度 high school, characteristic development, development space, limitation
  • 相关文献

参考文献10

  • 1秦玉友,孙颖.学校布局调整:追求与限度[J].教育研究,2011,32(A06):94-101. 被引量:13
  • 2Pittman, R. B. & Haughwout, P. Influence of High School Size on Dropout Rate[J]. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 1987, 9(4): 337- 343.
  • 3Nicola A. Alexander. Race, Poverty, and the Student Curriculum: Implications for Standards Policy[J]. American Educational Research Joumal, 2002, 39(3).
  • 4教育发展规划司.中国教育统计年鉴[Z].北京:人民教育出版社,2011.68,67,132,127,156,154.
  • 5D. H. Monk. Secondary school size and curriculum comprehensiveness[J]. Economics of Education Review, 1987(6): 137-150.
  • 6Turner, C. C. & Thrasher, J. M.. School size does make a difference[R]. San Diego, CA: Institute for Educational Management. 1970:1.
  • 7秦玉友,陈旭远.学生负担结构论[J].教学与管理(中学版),2000(7):11-13. 被引量:9
  • 8[英]彼德·罗赛尔.大脑的功能与潜力[M].北京:中国人民出版社,1988.
  • 9彭文晋.人才学概论[M].哈尔滨:黑龙江人民出版社,1983.97.
  • 10中国青少年研究中心.中日韩美四国高中生权益状况比较研究报告[R].http://news.xinhuanet.com/newscenter/2009-03/23/content_11059090.htm.2009-03-23/2009-03-26.

二级参考文献25

  • 1(美)罗尔斯(Rawls,J.)著,何怀宏等.正义论[M]中国社会科学出版社,1988.
  • 2Pittman,R.B,Haughwout,P.Influence of High School Size on Dropout Rate. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis . 1987
  • 3Carney,Mabel.Country Life and Country School:A Study of the Agencies of Rural Progress and the Social Relationship of the School to the Country Community. . 1912
  • 4Brent Edward Wholeben.How to Determine Which School to Close. NASSP Bulletin . 1980
  • 5Karin Barty,et al.Unpacking the Issues:Researching the Shortage of School Principals in Two States in Australia. The Australian Educational Researcher . 2005
  • 6Deborah W.Mier.The Big Benefits of Smallness. Educational Leadership . 1996
  • 7Spence,Beth.Long School Bus Rides:Stealing the Joy of Childhood. . 2000
  • 8E.Fredua-Kwarteng.School Closures in Ontario:Who Has the Final Say-. Canadian Journal of Educational Administration and Policy . 2005
  • 9OECD.Citizens as Partners:Information,Consultation and Public Participation in Policy-making. . 2001
  • 10Greene,R.K.Models of School Board Policy-making. Educational Administration Quarterly . 1992

共引文献23

同被引文献8

引证文献2

二级引证文献3

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部