期刊文献+

经内镜微波凝固联合雷贝拉唑治疗Barrett食管疗效观察

CURATIVE EFFECT OF ENDOSCOPIC MICROWAVE COAGULATION COMBINED WITH RABEPRAZOLE FOR TREATMENT OF BARRETT'S ESOPHAGUS
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的观察内镜下微波凝固联合雷贝拉唑治疗Barrett食管的临床疗效。方法选择经胃镜及病理检查确诊的Barrett食管患者55例,随机分为治疗组(28例)和对照组(27例)。治疗组以内镜下微波凝固后,给予口服雷贝拉唑20mg/d,抑酸治疗,对照组仅口服雷贝拉唑20mg/d,二组均治疗12个月。观察治疗后症状的改善及3,6,12个月内镜和病理复查情况。结果二组的临床症状均较治疗前明显改善,症状缓解率差异无统计学意义(P>0.05),治疗组Barrett食管上皮逆转总有效率3,6,12个月时分别为64.29%、67.86%和78.57%,而对照组则分别为0,0,14.81%,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论内镜下微波凝固联合雷贝拉唑治疗Barrett食管,效果优于单用抑酸剂。 Objective To explore the clinical effect of endoscopic microwave coagulation combined with Rabeprazole for treatment of Barrett's esophagus. Methods Fifty - five patients who were diagnosed as Barrett% esophagus by gastroscopy and pathology were randomly divided into treatment group (n= 28) and control group (n = 27). The treatment group were treated with microwave coagulation under endoscope, Rabeprazole(20mg/day) was given oral to suppress acid, the control group only oral Rabeprazole(20mg/ day), all patients were followed- up for 12 months. Improvement of symptoms were observed after treatment and endoscope and pathology checked methods were performed after 3, 6, 12 months for all cases. Results The clinical symptoms of patients were significantly improved after treatment in two groups, but their symptom relief rate was no significant difference (P〈0. 05). Barrett's esophageal epithelium reverse the total effective rate of 3, 6 and 12 months were 64.290%, 67.86% ,78. 57% respectively for treatment group, and 0, 0, 14.81% for control group, there was a significant difference between two groups(P〈 0.05). Conclusion Endoscopic microwave coagulation combined with Rabeprazole for the treatment of Barrett's esophagus is a more effective means than acid inhibitor only.
出处 《中国煤炭工业医学杂志》 2013年第5期712-713,共2页 Chinese Journal of Coal Industry Medicine
关键词 BARRETT食管 微波凝固 内镜 雷贝拉唑 Barrett's esophagus Microwave coagulation Endoscopic Rabeprazole
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

二级参考文献47

  • 1赵晶京,房殿春,徐承平,章容,范玉林,李向红,彭贵勇,王振华.Barrett食管放大内镜下分型与组织病理学关系的研究[J].中华消化内镜杂志,2005,22(3):154-157. 被引量:17
  • 2房殿春,许同铭,赵晶京.Barrett食管诊治共识(草案,2005,重庆)[J].中华消化杂志,2006,26(2):138-139. 被引量:53
  • 3张红燕,李珊珊,任秀花,闫爱华.survivin和Mcm5在食管活检组织中的表达及意义[J].实用诊断与治疗杂志,2006,20(10):717-719. 被引量:5
  • 4王清华,郭新宁.Barrett食管的研究现状及展望[J].宁夏医学杂志,2007,29(2):189-191. 被引量:5
  • 5田德安.Barrett食管的诊断与治疗[J].医学新知,2007,17(2):63-65. 被引量:2
  • 6Sharma P, McQuaid K, Dent J, et al. A critical review of the diagnosis and management of Barrett's esophagus: the AGA Chicago Workshop. Gastroenterology, 2004,127:310-330.
  • 7Meguid RA, Weiss ES, Chang DC, et al. The effect of volume on esophageal cancer resections: what constitutes acceptable resection volumes for centers of excellence. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg, 2009,137:23-29.
  • 8Namasivayam V, Wang KK, Prasad GA. Endoscopic mucosal resection in the management of esophageal neoplasia: current status and future directions. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol, 2010,8 : 743- 754 ; quiz e96.
  • 9Badreddine R J, Prasad GA, Lewis JT, et al. Depth of submucosal invasion does not predict lymph node metastasis and survival of patients with esophageal carcinoma. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol, 2010,8:248-253.
  • 10Alvarez HL, Pouw RE, van VFG, et al. Safety and efficacy of multiband mucosectomy in 1060 resections in Barrett's esophagus. Endoscopy, 2011,43:177-183.

共引文献17

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部