摘要
《食品安全法》第96条是我国迄今为止关于惩罚性赔偿额度最大的法律规定,表明了立法机关严厉惩处严重违法的食品经营行为的价值取向。但这一规定也存在着明显的不足,影响着惩罚性赔偿制度在食品安全领域实际效用的发挥。在该条款的内容上,惩罚性赔偿的责任主体不应排除食用农产品的经营者;权利主体不应仅限定于"消费者",应扩张至所有的受害人;食品销售者适用惩罚性赔偿的主观过错不应仅限定为故意,还应包括重大过失;对惩罚性赔偿金数额的确定受害人应有选择权。
Article 96 in Food Safety Law is the most severe legal provision on punitive damages so far, this shows the value judgment of the legislative body about severely punishing the serious food illegal act. However there is some obvious regret about the stipulation also and this affects the effect of punitive damages system in the field of food safety. On the content of the term, the responsibility subject of punitive damages shouldn＇t exclude the business operators of edible agricultural products.And the subject of right shouldn＇t be limited to consumer only, but also-be extended to the all victims.The subjective fault of food seller on punitive damages shouldn＇t be limited to formed design, but also include grievous faulty. About the resolution of punitive damages amount, victims should have option.
出处
《生态经济》
CSSCI
北大核心
2013年第6期85-89,共5页
Ecological Economy
关键词
惩罚性赔偿
食用农产品
责任主体
权利主体
主观过错
punitive damages
edible agricultural products
subject of responsibility
subject of right
subjective fault
