期刊文献+

基于两种不确定的稳健设计方法及其在车身轻量化设计中的应用 被引量:2

Robust Design Method Considering Two Sources of Uncertainties and Its Application in Autobody Lightweight Design
下载PDF
导出
摘要 针对传统基于近似模型的稳健设计方法中近似模型预测误差易导致优化解约束失效的问题,综合考虑参数不确定和近似模型预测不确定的影响,建立基于2种不确定因素的稳健设计方法,并通过数学测试案例验证所提方法的优化效果.同时,针对车身轻量化问题进行应用研究,选取非线性程度高、近似模型不确定影响大的耐撞性指标作为稳健约束.结果表明,基于2种不确定因素的稳健方法可以有效保证高维、强非线性问题优化解的可靠性,并在满足碰撞性能指标的前提下,达到车身减重11.06%的轻量化效果,从而验证了所提方法的可行性. In traditional metamodel-based robust design methods, the dependency between metamodels and true responses will inevitably introduce so-called metamodel uncertainty in robust design. Previous robust design methods often treat a metamodel as the real model and ignore the influence of metamodel uncertain- ty in robust solutions. It often finds a solution in the infeasible region. So the concept of robust design is extended for both parametric uncertainty and metamodel uncertainty to evaluate the compound effect in system responses. A mathematical example was employed to illustrate the superior performance of the pro- posed robust design method. The method was applied to an autobody lightweight design problem, in which the high-dimensional and high-nonlinear crashworthiness responses are chosen as constraint functions. The results show that the proposed method can reduce the risk of constraint violation due to metamodel uncer- tainty. The robust solution improves the impact performances and reduces the structure weight by 11.06%. It demonstrates the proposed method is an effective tool in autobody robust design.
出处 《上海交通大学学报》 EI CAS CSCD 北大核心 2013年第5期834-839,共6页 Journal of Shanghai Jiaotong University
基金 国家自然科学基金项目(50875164)资助
关键词 稳健设计 参数不确定 近似模型不确定 轿车偏置碰撞 车身轻量化设计 robust design parametric uncertainty metamodeling uncertainty 40% offset impact auto- body lightweight design
  • 相关文献

参考文献12

  • 1李玉强,崔振山,陈军,阮雪榆,张冬娟.基于响应面模型的6σ稳健设计方法[J].上海交通大学学报,2006,40(2):201-205. 被引量:39
  • 2潘锋,朱平,章斯亮.轿车车顶压溃仿真与结构耐撞性研究[J].中国公路学报,2010,23(3):108-114. 被引量:13
  • 3Zhang Y, Zhu P, Chen G L. Lightweight design of automotive front side rail based ob robust optimiza- tion [J]. Thin-Walled Structures, 2007, 45 (7-8): 670-676.
  • 4高云凯,孙芳,余海燕.基于Kriging模型的车身耐撞性优化设计[J].汽车工程,2010,32(1):17-21. 被引量:19
  • 5Wang G G, Shan S. Review of metamodeling tech- niques in support of engineering design optimization[J]. ASME Journal of Mechanical Design, 2007, 129 (4) : 370-380.
  • 6Apley D W, Liu J, Chen W. Understanding the effects of model uncertainty in robust design with computer experiments[J].ASME Journal of Mechan- ical Design, 2006, 128 (4): 946-958.
  • 7Jin R, Du X P, Chen W. The use of metamodeling techniques for optimization under uncertainty [J].Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization, 2003, 25 (2): 99-116.
  • 8Allen J K, Seepersad C, Choi H J, et al. Robust de- sign for multiscale and multidisciplinary applications [J]. ASME Journal of Mechanical Design, 2006, 128 (4): 832-843.
  • 9王红涛,竺晓程,杜朝辉.改进EGO算法在跨声速翼型气动优化设计中的应用[J].上海交通大学学报,2009,43(11):1832-1836. 被引量:9
  • 10Kleijnen J P C. Kriging metamodeling in simulation: A review [J ]. European Journal of Operational Research, 2009, 192 (3): 707-716.

二级参考文献55

共引文献128

同被引文献14

引证文献2

二级引证文献9

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部