期刊文献+

两个柱花草品种根系构型差异及其对间作柑橘砧木实生苗磷营养的竞争 被引量:2

Difference in Root Architecture of Two Stylosanthes Cultivars and Their Competition for Phosphorus with Citrus Rootstock Seedling
原文传递
导出
摘要 根系构型与植物的养分吸收密切相关,可能影响植物不同个体间的养分竞争。比较了‘格拉姆’和‘184号’柱花草(Stylosanthes Sw.)的根系构型差异,并探讨了两者在间作条件下对柑橘砧木红藜檬(Citrus limonia)实生苗的生长和养分吸收的影响。结果表明,‘格拉姆’和‘184号’在单作条件下生物量、总根长、主根长和根尖数相似,但是‘184号’的基根角度、根系表面积、平均根直径均小于‘格拉姆’;在与柑橘实生苗间作条件下,‘184号’有41.4%的根系进入柑橘根区,而‘格拉姆’仅有0.8%的根系进入柑橘根区,因此与‘184号’间作的柑橘砧木实生苗的生物量和对磷养分的吸收均显著低于与‘格拉姆’间作的柑橘砧木实生苗。本研究表明,与根系垂直生长型的‘格拉姆’相比,根系水平生长型的柱花草‘184号’不宜用于果园生草栽培,根系构型应该成为草种筛选的重要指标。 Root architecture is closely associated with plant nutrient uptake, and can influence the nutrient competition among different plants. Root architectures of Stylosanthes 'Graham' and 'CIAT 184' were compared, and their effects on plant growth and nutrient uptake of Citrus limonia in inter-cropping condition were investigated. Results indicated that, the biomass, total root length, tap root length and root tip number were comparable for 'Graham' and 'CIAT 184' in mono-cropping condition, however, the basal root angle, root surface area and average root diameter of 'CIAT 184' were lower than those of ' Graham'. In inter-cropping condition, 41.4% roots of' CIAT 184' grew into the root zone of citrus while only 0.8% roots of ' Graham' grew into the root zone of citrus. Therefore, the biomass and phosphorus uptake of citrus seedlings inter-cropped with 'CIAT 184' were significantly lower than those with 'Graham' . This study suggests that Stylosanthes ' CIAT 184' with horizontal root growth are not suitable for sod culture in orchard when compared with Stylosanthes 'Graham' with vertical root growth, and that root architecture can be regarded as critical indicator for the screening of grass species.
出处 《园艺学报》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2013年第5期953-959,共7页 Acta Horticulturae Sinica
基金 国家自然科学基金项目(31270448,U1131001)
关键词 柑橘 柱花草 根系构型 养分竞争 citrus Stylosanthes root architecture nutrient competition
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

二级参考文献106

共引文献241

同被引文献49

  • 1李国怀,伊华林.生草栽培对柑橘园土壤水分与有效养分及果实产量、品质的影响[J].中国生态农业学报,2005,13(2):161-163. 被引量:149
  • 2吴建军,李全胜,严力蛟.幼龄桔园间作牧草的土壤生态效应及其对桔树生长的影响[J].生态学杂志,1996,15(4):10-14. 被引量:20
  • 3周志翔,李国怀,徐永荣.果园生态栽培及其生理生态效应研究进展[J].生态学杂志,1997,16(1):45-52. 被引量:40
  • 4G6mez J A, Liewellyn C, Basch G, et al. The effects of cover crops and conventional tillageon soil and runoff loss in vineyard and olive groves in several Mediterranean countries[J]. Soil Use and Management,2011,27(4):502-514.
  • 5Granatstein D, Sdnchez E. Research knowledge and needs for orchard floor management in organic tree fruit systems[J].International Journal of Fruit Science,2009,9(3):257~281.
  • 6Whitelaw-Weckert M A, Rahman L, Hutton R J, et al. Permanent swards increase soil microbial counts in two Australian vineyards[J].Applied Soil Ecology,2007,36(2):224-232.
  • 7Wang P, Zhang J J, Xia R X, et al. Arbuscular mycorrhiza, rhizospheric microbe populations and soil enzyme activities in citrus orchards under two types of no-tillage soil management [J].Spanish Journal of Agricultural Research,2011,9(4):1307-1318.
  • 8Mengel K, Kirkby E A. Principles of plant nutrition[M].Bem, Switzerland: International Potash Institute, 1987:247-252.
  • 9Melvile N, Morgan R P C. The influence of grass density on effective-hess of contour grass strips control of soil erosion on low angle slops[J]~Soil Use and Management,2001,17 (4):278-281.
  • 10Simon S,Bouvier J, Debras J, et al. Biodiversity and pest management in orchard systems[J]. Sustainable Agriculture,2011,2 (5):693-709.

引证文献2

二级引证文献5

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部