摘要
目的评价第2版欧洲心脏手术危险评估系统(EuroSCOREⅡ)模型对本中心瓣膜手术患者在院死亡率预测的准确性。方法回顾性收集2006年1月至2011年12月因瓣膜疾病在本中心行外科治疗的3 479例患者的临床资料,按第1版的EuroSCORE(additive EuroSCORE、logistic EuroSCORE)模型和EuroSCOREⅡ模型模给予评分,并对患者的实际死亡率与预测死亡率进行对比。模型预测的符合程度应用H-L X^2检验,而预测的鉴别效度则通过R()C曲线下面积反映。结果 3479例患者在院死亡112例,全组实际在院死亡率为3.2%。Additive EuroSCORE、logistic EuroSCORE及EuroSCOREⅡ模型预测的在院死亡率分别为3.8%、3.3%和2.5%,其中logistic EuroSCORE对全组患者在院死亡的预测符合程度较高(P=0.08),而additive EuroSCORE高估了实际在院死亡率(P=0.013),EuroSCOREⅡ则低估了实际在院死亡率(P<0.000 1)。EuroSCOREⅡ模型对单瓣膜手术患者在院死亡预测具有较好的准确性(P=0.103,ROC曲线下面积为0.792),而对多瓣膜手术组患者的预测准确性则较差(P<0.000 1,ROC曲线下面积为0.605)。Additive EuroSCORE、logistic EuroSCORE及EuroSCOREⅡ模型对全组患者在院死亡预测的鉴别效度均较差(ROC曲线下面积分别为0.684、0.673和0.685)。结论 EuroSCOREⅡ模型对本中心单瓣膜手术患者死亡风险预测的准确性较好,但对多瓣膜手术患者死亡风险预测的准确性较差,不适合多瓣膜手术患者的在院死亡风险预测,在临床实践中应慎重考虑。
Objective To assess the performance of the European System for Cardiac Operative Risk Evaluation Ⅱ (EuroSCORE Ⅱ) in predicating in-hospital mortality among Chinese patients undergoing heart valve surgery at our center. Methods From January 2006 to December 2011, 3 479 consecutive patients who underwent heart valve surgery at our center were enrolled in this study and they were scored by the original EuroSCORE(addtive EuroSCORE and logistic EuroSCORE) and EuroSCORE Ⅱ model. The actual mortality rate of patients was compared with those of the predicted ones. The performances of the original EuroSCORE and EuroSCORE Ⅱ model were assessed by the Hosmer-Lemeshow (H-L) test. The discrimination validity of prediction was tested by calculating the area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. Results There were 112 in-hospital deaths among the 3 479 patients, with an in-hospital mortality rate of 3.2% , compared to the predicted mortality rates of 3.84 % by the additive EuroSCORE (H-L: P= 0. 013, suggesting a higher prediction) , 3.33 % by the logistic EuroSCORE (H-L: P=0.08, suggesting good consistency), and 2. 520%by the EuroSCORE Ⅱ (H-L: P〈0. 0001, suggesting a lower prediction). EuroSCORE Ⅱshowed a good calibration in predicting in-hospital mortality for patients undergoing single valve surgery (H-L: P=0. 103, area under the ROC curve of 0. 792) and a poor calibration for patients undergoing multiple valve surgery (H-L: P〈0. 0001, area under the ROC curve of 0. 605). The discriminative powers of the predictions by additive EuroSCORE, logistic EuroSCORE, and EuroSCORE Ⅱ were poor for the entire cohort, with the areas under the ROC curve being 0. 684, 0. 673, and 0. 685, respectively. Conclusion EuroSCORE Ⅱ has a better accuracy for predicting mortality of patients undergoing single valve surgery, but not for those undergoing multiple valve surgery, which should be considered in clinical practice.
出处
《第二军医大学学报》
CAS
CSCD
北大核心
2013年第5期536-540,共5页
Academic Journal of Second Military Medical University
基金
卫生公益性行业科研专项基金(200802096)~~