期刊文献+

达芬奇机器人纵隔肿物切除术23例临床分析 被引量:4

Da Vinci Surgical System for Resection of Mediastinal Tumor:A Report of 23 Cases
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探讨应用达芬奇机器人行纵隔肿物切除术的可行性。方法回顾性分析2009年1月~2012年12月通过达芬奇机器人行纵隔肿物切除手术23例的临床资料。年龄33~72岁,平均48.8岁。前纵隔肿物19例,中纵隔肿物1例,后纵隔肿物3例。三孔法,左侧机械臂为抓钳,右侧机械臂为超声刀,中间为观察孔。前纵隔胸腺来源肿物行全胸腺切除术,后纵隔及中纵隔来源肿物沿肿物包膜完整切除。结果 23例手术均获成功,全胸腺切除术19例,中纵隔气管囊肿剥除术1例,后纵隔肿物切除术3例。手术时间(93.9±38.6)min,术中出血(55.2±18.6)ml,术后24小时胸管引流量(115.2±69.9)ml,术后住院时间(5.4±1.4)d。全组无围手术期死亡,无中转开胸。术后病理示胸腺瘤16例,神经鞘瘤3例,胸腺囊肿2例,胸腺增生及支气管囊肿各1例。23例随访1~48个月,平均20个月,无复发。结论应用达芬奇机器人行纵隔肿物切除术安全可行。 Objective To investigate the feasibility of da Vinci surgical system in the treatment of mediastinal tumor Methods From January 2009 to December 2012, by using da Vinci surgical system, we performed resection of mediastinal tumor on totally 23 patients (mean age: 48. 8 years, ranged from 33 to 72 ). Among the cases, the tumor was detected in the anterior mediastinum in 19 patients, middle mediastinum in 1, and posterior mediastinum in 3. Three ports were used, with the left mechanical arm for forceps, right mechanical arm for ultrasonic scalpel, and the middle hole for observation. Total thymectomy was performed on the patients with anterior mediastinal tumor, and resection of the middle or posterior mediastinal tumor was carried out in the others. Results The procedure was completed in all the 23 patients within (93.9 ± 38.6) min. The mean intraoperative blood loss was (55.2 ± 18.6) ml. Total thymectomy was made in 19 cases, the other four patients received resection of the middle ( 1 case) or posterior (3 cases) mediastinal tumor, respectively. No patient died or was converted to open surgery. Postoperative pathological examination showed thymoma in 16 cases, schwannoma in 3, thymic cyst in 2, thymic hyperplasia in l, and bronchogenic cyst in 1. The patients were followed up for 1 to 48 months with a mean of 20 months, during which no recurrent cases were detected. Conclusion Da Vinci surgical system is feasible and safe for resection of mediastinal tumor.
出处 《中国微创外科杂志》 CSCD 2013年第5期392-393,397,共3页 Chinese Journal of Minimally Invasive Surgery
关键词 机器人手术 胸外科手术 胸腔镜 Robotic-assisted surgery Thoracic surgery Thoracoscope
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

二级参考文献66

  • 1刘钢,李龙,黄柳明.腹腔镜治疗小儿先天性膈疝6例报告[J].解放军医学杂志,2006,31(3):258-259. 被引量:9
  • 2Kernstine KH, Anderson CA, Falabella A. Robotic lobeetomy. Oper Tech Thorac Cardiovasc Surg,2008,13 ( 3 ) :204el - 204c23.
  • 3Jones A,Sethia K.Robotic surgery[J].Ann R Coll Surg Engl,2010,92(1):5-13.
  • 4Wilson EB.The evolution of robotic general surgery[J].Scand J Surg,2009,98(2):125-134.
  • 5Rodriguez E.Chitwood WR Robotics in cardiac surgery[J].Scand J Surg,2009,98(2):120-124.
  • 6Lee EK,Baack J,Duchene DA.Survey of practicing urologists:Robotic versus open radical prostatectomy[J].Can J Urol,2010,17(2):5094-5112.
  • 7Cho JE,Nezhat FR.Robotics and gynecologic oncology:Review of the literature[J].J Minim Invasive Gynecol,2009,16(6):669-681.
  • 8Roukos DH.The era of robotic surgery for colorectal cancer[J].Ann Surg Oncol,2010,17(1):338-347.
  • 9White MA,Haber GP,Kaouk JH.Robotic single-site surgery[J].Curr Opin Urol,2010,20(1):86-91.
  • 10Chen CC,Falcone T.Robotic gynecologic surgery:Past,present,and future[J].Clin Obstet Gynecol,2009,52(3):335-343.

共引文献91

同被引文献123

  • 1易俊,董国华,许飚,李好,景华.达芬奇-S外科手术辅助系统在普胸外科的应用[J].医学研究生学报,2011,24(7):696-699. 被引量:23
  • 2高长青,杨明,王刚,王加利,李丽霞,赵悦,肖苍松,李佳春,周琪.全机器人不开胸心脏手术4例[J].中华胸心血管外科杂志,2007,23(1):19-21. 被引量:56
  • 3张涛,周乃康,梁朝阳,柳曦,田晓东,王波,刘颖.原发性纵隔畸胎瘤的诊断与外科治疗[J].中华外科杂志,2007,45(16):1125-1127. 被引量:6
  • 4Pugin F,Bucher P,Morel P.History of robotic surgery:from Aesop and EUS to da Vinci.J Visc Surg,2011,148:e3-e8.
  • 5王国民.手术机器人是未来方向不能取代医生.医学论坛报,2013.
  • 6Palep JH.Robotic assisted minimally invasive surgery.J Minim Access,2009,5(1):1-7.
  • 7Rodrigues E,Chitwood WR.Robotics in cardiac surgery.Scand J Surg,2009,98(2):120-124.
  • 8Lotan Y,Cadeddu JA,Gettman MT.The new economics ofridical prostatectomy;cost comparison of open,laparoscopic and robot assisted techniques,J Urol,2004,172:1431-1435.
  • 9Anderson JK,Murdock A,Cadeddu JA,et al.Cost comparison of laparoscopic versus radical retropubic prostatectomy.Urology,2005,66(3):557-560.
  • 10Link RE,Su LM,Bhayani SB,et al.Making ends meet:a cost comparison of laparoscopic and open radical retropubic prostateetomy.J Urol,2004,172(1):269-274.

引证文献4

二级引证文献24

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部