期刊文献+

不同剂量右美托咪定对丙泊酚复合瑞芬太尼用于整形外科手术患者麻醉效果的影响 被引量:40

Effects of different doses of on anesthetic efficacy of propofol and remifentanil in patients undergoing plastic surgery
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的评价不同剂量右美托咪定对丙泊酚复合瑞芬太尼用于整形外科手术患者麻醉效果的影响。方法择期行大面积皮肤瘢痕切除和进行皮瓣转移的手术患者60例,性别不限,年龄18。64岁,体重45~75kg,ASA分级I或Ⅱ级,采用随机数字表法,将患者.分为3组(n=20):对照组(C组)、低剂量负荷量右美托咪定组(D1组)和高剂量负荷量右美托咪定组(D2组),D。组和D:组分别于麻醉诱导前10min静脉输注右美托咪定0.6、1.0μg/kg负荷量,随后以0.4μg·kg^-1·h^-1速率静脉输注至手术结束前30min。麻醉诱导:靶控输注丙泊酚(血浆靶浓度4.0μg/ml)和瑞芬太尼(效应室靶浓度2.0ng/m1),患者意识消失后静脉注射罗库溴铵0.6mg/kg,气管插管后,机械通气,麻醉维持:靶控输注丙泊酚(血浆靶浓度2.0~3.5μg/ml)和瑞芬太尼(效应室靶浓度1.5—2.5ng/m1),维持Narco.trend指数为D级。分别于麻醉前、右美托咪定输注10min、气管插管前即刻、气管插管后1min、气管插管后5min、停止输注右美托咪定、拔除气管导管前即刻、拔除气管导管后1min、拔除气管导管后5min时记录Narcotrend指数、收缩压(SP)、舒张压(DP)和HR。记录麻醉诱导时间、丙泊酚和瑞芬太尼的用量,记录自主呼吸、定向力恢复和拔除气管导管的时间。拔除气管导管后10rain时行镇静一躁动评分,记录术中窦性心动过缓和麻醉恢复期不良事件的发生情况。结果与C组比较,D1组和D2组丙泊酚、瑞芬太尼的总用量和拔除气管导管后10min时镇静一躁动评分、麻醉恢复期恶心、呛咳和躁动的发生率降低,右美托咪定输注10min时Narcotrend指数和HR降低,D2组麻醉诱导时间缩短(P〈0.05或0.01),D2组术中窦性心动过缓发生率高于C组和D1组(P〈0.05),3组间自主呼吸恢复时间、定向力恢复时间和拔除气管导管时间差异无统计学意义(P〉0.05)。D1组和D2组气管插管前后和拔除气管导管前后SP、DP和HR差异无统计学意义(P〉0.05)。结论对于整形外科手术患者,麻醉诱导前静脉输注右美托咪定负荷量0.6μg/kg,随后以0.4μg·kg^-1·h^-1速率输注可缩短麻醉诱导时间,减少丙泊酚和瑞芬太尼用量,有效地抑制气管插管和拔除气管导管时的应激反应,降低了不良反应的发生。 Objective To investigate the effects of different doses of dcxmedetomidine on the anesthetic efficacy of propofol and remifentani] in patients undergoing plastic surgery. Methods Sixty ASA Ⅰ or Ⅱ patients of both sexes, aged 18-64 yr, weighing 45-75 kg, scheduled for elective plastic surgery, were randomly assigned into 3 groups ( n = 20 each) : control group (C group), low loading dose dexmedetomidine group (D1 group) and high loading dose dexmedetomidine group (D2 group ). Dexmedetomidine was infused at a rate of 0.4 μg· kg- 1 . h- 1 until 30 min before the end of surgery after a loading dose of dcxmedetomidine 0.6 ( group D1 ) or 1.0 μg/kg (group I:)2 ) was infused at 10 min before induction of anesthesia in groups D1 and D2 . Anesthesia was induced with target-controlled infusion of propofol (target plasma concentraiton 4.0 μg/ml) and remifentanil (target effect-site concentraiton 2.0 ng/ml). After the patients lost consciousness, rocuronium 0.6 mg/kg was injected in- travenously. The patients were mechanically ventilated after tracheal intubation. Anesthesia was maintained with target-controlled infusion of propofol (target plasma concentralton 2.0-3.5 μg/ml) and remifentanil (target effect- site concentraiton 1.5-2.5 ng/ml). Narcotrend index was maintained at Class D. Narcotrend index, systolic pres- sure (SP), diastolic pressure (DP) and HR were recorded before anesthesia (baseline), at 10 min of dexmedeto- midine infusion, at 0, 1 and 5 min after tracheal intubation, at the end of dexmedetomidine infusion, and at 0, 1 and 5 min after removal of the endotrachcal tube. The induction time, consumption of propofol and remifentanil, time for recovery of spontaneous breathing and orientation, extubation time, and Richmond Agitation Sedation Scale score at 10 min after removal of the endotracheal tube were recorded. The development of sinus bradycardia during operation and complications during recovery from anesthesia were also recorded. Results Compared with group C, the total consumption of propofol and remifentanil, Richmond Agitation Sedation Scale score at 10 min after removal of the endotracheal tube, and incidences of nausea, bucking and agitation during recovery from anesthesia, and Narcotrend index and HR at 10 min of dexmedetomidine infusion were significantly decreased in groups D1and D2 , and induction time was shortened in D2 group ( P 〈 0.05 or 0.01 ). The incidence of sinus bradycardia during op- eration was significantly higher in group D2 than in groups C and D1 (P 〈 0.05). There was no significant differ- ence in the time for recovery of spontaneous breathing and orientation, and extubation time between the three groups ( P 〉 0.05). There was no significant difference in SP, DP and HR before and after tracheal intubation and before and after removal of the endotracheal tube between groups D1 and D2 ( P 〉 0.05). Conclusion Infusion of dexmedetomidine at a rate of 0.4 μg· kg-1 . h-1 after a loading dose of 0.6 μg/kg infused before induction of anes- thesia can shorten the induction time, reduce the consumption of propofol and remifentanil, effectively inhibit the stress responses to tracheal intubation or removal of the endotracheal tube, and decrease the occurrence of side ef- fects in patients undergoing plastic surgery.
出处 《中华麻醉学杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2013年第3期306-310,共5页 Chinese Journal of Anesthesiology
基金 基金项目:国家自然科学基金面上资助项目(81171051)
关键词 右美托咪啶 二异丙酚 哌啶类 麻醉 静脉 Dexmedetomidine Propofol Piperidines Anesthesia, intravenous
  • 相关文献

参考文献15

  • 1Maze M, Bonnet F. Analgesics: receptor ligands-2 adrenergic recep-tor agonist// Evers AS, Maze M. Anesthetic pharmacology : physio-logic principles and clinical practice. Philadelphia : Churchill Living-stone ,2004 : 473-490.
  • 2Peden CJ,Cloote AH,Stratford N,et al. The effect of intravenousdexmedetomidine premedication on the dose requirement of propofolto induce loss of consciousness in patients receiving alfentanil. Anaes-thesia, 2001, 56(5):408-413.
  • 3吴新民,许幸,王俊科,王鲲鹏,薛张纲,缪长虹,邓小明,艾登斌,于浩.静脉注射右美托咪啶辅助全身麻醉的有效性和安全性[J].中华麻醉学杂志,2007,27(9):773-776. 被引量:242
  • 4Arain SR, Ebert TJ. The efficacy, side effects and recovery charac-teristics of dexmedetomidine versus propofol when used for intraopera-tive sedation. Anesth Analg, 2002,95 (2) :461-466.
  • 5Mizrak A,Sanli M,Bozgeyik S,et al. Dexmedetomidine use in directlaryngoscopic biopsy under TIVA. Middle East J Anesthesiol, 2012,21(4):605-612.
  • 6李坤河,李毅,舒海华,江楠,陈祯,肖亮灿.不同剂量右美托咪啶复合异丙酚和瑞芬太尼用于腹部手术病人麻醉的效果[J].中华麻醉学杂志,2012,32(7):799-801. 被引量:54
  • 7Sessler CN, Gosnell MS,Grap MJ, et al. The Richmond Agitation-Sedation Scale : validity and reliability in adult intensive care unit pa-tients. Am J Respir Crit Care Med,2002,166( 10) : 1338-1344.
  • 8佘守章,李慧玲,许学兵,莫世湟.右旋美托咪啶的镇静效应及其对全麻镇静深度的影响[J].临床麻醉学杂志,2006,22(1):10-12. 被引量:105
  • 9Kreuer S, Bruhn J, Larsen R, et al. Comparability of Narcotrend in-dex and bispectral index during propofol anaesthesia. Br J Anaesth,2004,93(2): 235-240.
  • 10Kreuer S, Biedler A, Larsen R, et al. The Narcotrend: a new EEGmonitor designed to measure the depth of anaesthesia. A comparisonwith bispectral index monitoring during propofol-remifentanil-anaes-thesia. Anaesthesist,2001,50( 12) :921-925 .

二级参考文献29

  • 1李民,张利萍,吴新民.右美托咪啶在临床麻醉中应用的研究进展[J].中国临床药理学杂志,2007,23(6):466-470. 被引量:483
  • 2佘守章,李慧玲,许学兵,莫世湟.右旋美托咪啶的镇静效应及其对全麻镇静深度的影响[J].临床麻醉学杂志,2006,22(1):10-12. 被引量:105
  • 3Chernik DA,Gillings D,Laine H,et al.Validity and reliability of the observer's assessment of alertness/sedation scale:study with intravenous midazolam.J Clin Psychopharmacol,1990,10:244-251.
  • 4Khan ZP,Ferguson CN,Jones RM.Alpha-2 and imidazoline receptor agonist:their pharmacology and therapeutic role.Anesthesia,1999,54:146-165.
  • 5Granholm M,McKusick BC,Westerholm FC,et al.Evaluation of the clinical efficacy and safety of dexmedetomidine or medetomidine in cats and their reversal with atipamezole.Veterinary anaesthesia and analgesia,2006,339:214-223.
  • 6Ebert TJ,Hall JE,Bamey JA,et al.The effects of increasing plasma concentrations of dexmedetomidine in humans.Anesthesiology,2000,93:382-394.
  • 7Bloor BC,Ward DS,Belleville JP,et al.Effects of intravenous dexmedetomidine in humans,Ⅱ:hemodynamic changes.Anesthesiology,1992,77:1134-1142.
  • 8Nelson LE,Lu J,Guo TZ,et al.The α2-Adrenoceptor agonist dexmedetomidine converges on an endogenous sleep-promoting pathway to exert its sedative effects.Anesthesiology,2003,98:428-436.
  • 9Kamibayashi T, Maze M. Clinical uses of ctz-adrenergic agonists, Anesthesiology, 2000, 93:1345-1349.
  • 10Ilfeld BM, Moray TE, Thannikary LJ, at al. Clonidine added to a continuous interscalene ropivacaine perineural infusion to improve postoperative analgesia: a randomized, doubleblind,controlled study. Anesth Analg, 2005, 100:1172-1178.

共引文献533

同被引文献320

引证文献40

二级引证文献264

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部