成年男性服刑人员家庭功能与应对方式病态人格的关系

Family functioning, coping style and psychopathic personality for adult male prisoners

目的探讨成年男性服刑人员家庭功能与应对方式、病态人格的关系。方法采用家庭关怀度指数问卷、简易应对方式问卷和病态人格量表对328名成年男性服刑人员进行调查，比较不同人口学变量成年男性服刑人员家庭功能、应对方式和病态人格的差异，不同家庭功能组成年男性服刑人员应对方式和病态人格的差异，进而用结构方程构建各变量问的关系模型。结果35岁以下成年男性服刑人员成长度[（1．17±0．76）分]、亲密度[（1．11±0．79）分]、消极应对[（1．15±0．51）分]因子和家庭关怀度总分[（5．61±2．73）分]显著低于35岁以上男性服刑人员[（1．35±0．72）分，（1．45±0．68）分，（1．30±0．58）分，（6．29±2．63）分，t=2．17，4．15，2．51，2．31]，而病态人格因子[（22．11±4．95）分]显著高于35岁以上男性服刑人员（19．40±5．06，t=4．89）；农村成年男性服刑人员适应度因子（1．04±0．69）显著低于城镇成年男性服刑人员（1．21±0．74，t=2．07），而积极应对因子（1．95±0．40）显著高于城镇成年男性服刑人员（1．81±0．43，t=3．09）；不同家庭功能组成年男性服刑人员积极应对方式（P=0．024）和病态人格（P=0．000）差异有统计学意义；成年男性服刑人员积极应对对家庭功能具有最强的正效应为0．275，病态人格对家庭功能具有最强的负效应为-0．257；消极应对对病态人格具有最强的正效应为0．197；家庭功能对病态人格具有最强的负效应为-0．266。结论积极的应对方式和良好的家庭功能可以调节成年男性服刑人员的人格特征，而积极应对和完善人格也能改善家庭功能，家庭功能与病态人格相互作用。

Objective To explore the relationship among family functioning,coping style,and psychopathic personality for adult male prisoners. Methods 328 adult male prisoners were surveyed with Family APGAR Index, Simplified Coping Style Questionnaire and Psychopathic Deviate Scale. Different demographic variables were compared on male prisoners＇family functioning, coping style and psychopathic personality. Coping style and psychopathic personality were compared among family functioning groups,then a relationship model was set up by structural equation modeling. Results The low age male prisoners showed significant lower growth （ 1.17 ± 0.76）, re- solve （ 1.11 ± 0.79 ）, negative coping style （ 1.15 ± 0.51 ）, the total scale of family APGAR （ 5.61 ± 2.73 ） and higher psychopathic personality （ 22. 11 ± 4.95 ） than the high age male prisoners （ （ 1.35 ± 0.72 ）, （ 1.45 ± 0.68）,（1.30±0.58）,（6.29±2.63）,（19.40±5.06）, t=2.17,4.15,2.51,2.31,4.89）. The ruralmale prisoners showed significant lower adaptation （ 1.04 ± 0.69） and higher positive coping style （ 1.95 ± 0.40） than the city male prisoners（ （ 1.21 ± 0.74 ）, （ 1.81 ± 0.43 ）, t = 2.07,3.09 ）. The positive coping style （P = 0. 024 ） and psychopathic personality （P = 0.000） of adult male prisoners among family functioning groups showed significantly difference. The strongest positive effect that adult male prisoners＇ positive coping style forecast family functioning was 0. 275. The strongest negtive effect that male prisoners＇ psychopathic personality forecast family functioning was 0. 257. The strongest negtive effect that male prisoners＇ negative coping style forecast psychopathic personality was 0. 197. The strongest positive effect that male prisoners＇ family functioning forecast psychopathic personality was 0.266. Conclusions Positive coping style and good family functioning could effectively adjust adult male prisoners＇ personality. Positive coping style and perfect personality could effectively improve adult male prisoners＇ family functioning. Family functioning and psychopathic personality interact with each other.