期刊文献+

WTO框架下CAC标准的适用析论 被引量:3

Analysis of the Application of the CAC Standards in the WTO
下载PDF
导出
摘要 随着食品贸易纠纷的增加,在WTO框架下,援引食品法典委员会制定的相关标准的情况频繁出现。该类标准法律性质上属于软法,原本不具有强制执行的法律效力,但在WTO下被重新定位,呈现出软法硬化的现象。文章就WTO框架下该类标准适用中涉及到的法律地位、合法性审查、冲突协调、国内法适用等主要问题展开了讨论。 With the increase in food trade dispute,the standards of Codex Alimentarius Commission frequently occur in the WTO.The standards,did not have the force of law,but be relocated under the WTO,showing a hardening of soft law.The article involves the legal status,review of legality,coordination of CAC and WTO,and the application in national law.
作者 曾文革 田路
机构地区 重庆大学法学院
出处 《重庆大学学报(社会科学版)》 CSSCI 北大核心 2013年第3期100-106,共7页 Journal of Chongqing University(Social Science Edition)
基金 中国法学会2012年度部级法学研究课题"食品安全监管国际软法的国内实施研究"(CLS(2012)C82) 国家社科基金"我国农业贸易生态化转型的法律保障研究"(12BFX143) 中央高校基本科研业务费资助重庆大学重大项目"中国-东盟自由贸易区农业贸易法律问题研究"(0226005201021)
关键词 食品安全 WTO CAC标准 适用 food safety WTO CAC standards application
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

  • 1Charnovitz S. International standards and the WTO [ G/ OL ]//GEORGE WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY LAW SCHOOL. Legal studies research paper,2005, 133 : 14 - 18 [2005-03-29]. http ://ssm. com/abstract = 694346.
  • 2van DER MEULEN BERND. THE Global Arena of Food Law: Emerging Contours of a Meta - Framework [ J ]. Ras- mus Law Review, 2010, 3 (4) :218.
  • 3LIVERMORE M A. Authority and legitimacy in global gov- ernance : Deliberation, institutional differentiation, and the Codex Alimentarius[ J]. New York University Law Review, 2006,81 (May) :767 - 768.

同被引文献29

  • 1FAO/WHO, Report of the Evaluation of the Codex Alimentarius and Other FAO and WHO Food Standards Work ,2002) . p. 6,p. 30,p. 39.
  • 2Scott, Joanne. The WTO Agreement on Sanitary and Phytosanitary Measures [ M ]. New York: Oxford University Press, 2007, P. 170.
  • 3Vietor, David G: The Sanitary and Phytosanitary Agreement of the World Trade Organization: An Assessment after Five Years [ J]. New York University Journal of International Law & Policy, 1999 - 2000, (32) :886.
  • 4Peel, Jacqueline. Science and Risk Regulation in International Law [ M ]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press ,2010. p. 294.
  • 5Masson- matthee, Marielle D. The Codex Alimentarius Commission and Its Standards [ M]. The Hague: TMC Asser, 2007. p. 68 ,p. 190 - 191.
  • 6Moy, G. G. ,Wessel, J.R. Codex Standards for Pesticides Residues[A]. Rees,N. & Watson, D. ( eds. ). International Standards for Food Safety[ C]. Berlin:Springer, 2000. p. 215.
  • 7Livermore, Michael A. Authority and Legitimacy in Global Governance: Deliberation, Institutional Differentiation and the Codex Alimentarius[ J ]. New York University Law Review, 2006, (8 t ). p. 784 - 785, p. 787, p. 789,p. 790 - 791.
  • 8Wallach, Loft M. Globalization and Sovereignty: Accountable Governance in the Era of Globalization: The WTO, NAFTA, and International Harmonization of Standards[ J]. Kan. L Rev. ,2002, (50) :836.
  • 9Boyle, Alan,Chinkin, Christine. The Making of International Law[ M]. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2007. p. 55, p. 101 - 102,p. 159.
  • 10Buzan, Barry. Negotiating by Consensus: Developments in Technique at the UN Conference on the Law of the Sea[ J]. Amer- ican Journal of International Law, 1981, (75) :329.

引证文献3

二级引证文献3

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部