摘要
目的探讨两种动静脉造瘘术的治疗效果。方法将40例患者在随机对照条件下分别采取不同的动静脉造瘘术,比较效果。结果采用连续外翻缝合方法的造瘘术相较间断缝合术效果更好,并且并发症、不良反应也较少。结论连续外翻缝合动静脉造瘘术较间断缝合术效果好,值得做进一步研究。
Objective To compare the two arteriovenous ostomy effect. Methods 40 patients in randomized controlled conditions respectively adopt different arteriovenous ostomy, more effect. Results Tthe continuous everting suture method fistulization in continuous suture technique effect is better, and complications, adverse reactions were also less. Conclusion Continuous everting suture arteriovenous fistulation is continuous suture technique effect is good, it is worth to do further research.
出处
《中外医疗》
2013年第11期3-4,共2页
China & Foreign Medical Treatment
关键词
慢性肾衰
动静脉造瘘
并发症
Chronic renal failure
Arteriovenous fistulas created
Complications
