期刊文献+

经后腹腔途径腹腔镜下肾癌根治术的临床效果

Clinical Effects Of Retroperitoneal Laparoscopic Radical Nephrectomy
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的观察和评价临床上经后腹腔途径腹腔镜下肾癌根治术的效果以及安全性。方法以该院收治的50例肾癌患者为研究对象,患者均上经后腹腔途径腹腔镜下肾癌根治术治疗,回顾性分析患者的临床资料。结果 50例手术均成功,手术时间80~150 min;出血量50~150 mL;术后患者肠功能恢复时间为2~3 d,患者住院时间为7~14 d;对患者进行为期3个月~1年的随访,在此期间未出现复发以及转移。结论经后腹腔途径腹腔镜下肾癌根治术是着一种微创手术,安全有效。 Objective To observe and evaluate the clinical effect and safety of laparoscopic radical nephrectomy via retroperi- toneum. Methods 50 cases of renal carcinoma treated in our hospital were the research object, all patients were treated through la- paroscopic radical nephrectomy via retroperitoneum, clinical data of patients were retrospectively analyzed. Results 50 cases' surgeries were successful, operation time was 80~150 minutes; amount of bleeding was 50 to 150 ml; patients' recovery time of bowel function after operation was 2-3 days, hospital stays were 7N14 days; during 3 months to 1 years' follow-up visit, there was no recurrence or metastasis appeared. Conclusion The retroperitoneal approach of laparoscopic radical nephrectomy is a kind of minimally invasive surgery, safe and effective.
作者 闫伟
出处 《中外医疗》 2013年第14期71-71,73,共2页 China & Foreign Medical Treatment
关键词 后腹腔 腹腔镜 肾癌 根除术 疗效 Retroperitoneum Laparoscopic Kidney cancer Radical nephrectomy Curative effect
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

二级参考文献52

  • 1马潞林,赵磊,黄毅,肖春雷,卢剑.后腹腔镜下与开放式两种肾癌根治术的疗效比较[J].临床泌尿外科杂志,2004,19(8):454-455. 被引量:38
  • 2杨明山,王琳,李希明,吴吉涛,高振利,夏术阶.腹腔镜与开放肾癌根治术的临床效果比较(附102例报告)[J].山东医药,2006,46(21):40-41. 被引量:5
  • 3张军,张旭,李宏召,陈军,许凯,傅斌,郎斌,马鑫,郑涛.后腹腔镜下根治性肾切除术治疗肾癌的疗效观察[J].中华泌尿外科杂志,2007,28(7):439-443. 被引量:19
  • 4Gill I S, Schweizer D, Hobart M G, etal. Retroperitoneal laparoscopic radical nephrectomy: the Cleveland clinic experience[J]. J Urol, 2000,163 : 1665-1670.
  • 5Edward M, Mark B, Marcelo A, et al. Laparoscopic radical nephrectomy: comparison of clinical stage T1 and T2 renal tumors[J]. Urology, 2006,68: 1183-1187.
  • 6Abreu S C, Kaouk J H, Steinberg A P, et al. Retroperitoneal laparoscopic radical nephrectomy: in a superobese patientbody mass index (BMI 77 kg/m^2) [J]. Urology, 2004,63:175-175.
  • 7Wille A H, Roigasa J, Degera S, et al. Laparoscopic radical nephrectomy: techniques, results and ontological outcome in 125 consecutive cases[J]. Eur Urol, 2004,45:483 - 489.
  • 8Shuford M D, McDougall E M, Chang S, et al. Complications of contempo-rary radical nephrectomy: comparison of open vs. laparoscopic approach. Urologic Oncology[J]. Urol Oncol, 2004,22 : 121 - 126.
  • 9Saika T, Ono Y, Hattori R, et al. Long term outcome of laparoseopic radical neph rectomy for pathologic T1 renal cell carcinoma[J]. Urology, 2003, 62(6): 1018 -1023.
  • 10Robert B, Stacy Loeb J, Quentin Clemens, et al. A Prospective Study of Laparoscopic Radical Nephrectomy for T1 Tumors Is Transperitoneal, Retroperitoneal or Hand Assisted the Best Approach[J]. J Urol,2006,176 (1) : 414.

共引文献64

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部