期刊文献+

局部晚期非小细胞肺癌同步加量调强放疗的回顾性分析 被引量:16

Simultaneously integrated boost intensity-modulated radiotherapy for locally advanced non-smallcell lung cancer:A retrospective study of 78 patients
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的 分析采用同步加量调强放疗(SIB-IMRT)技术治疗局部晚期非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)的疗效及安全性.方法 回顾分析2008年1月至2011年6月在我院胸部放疗科行SIB-IMRT治疗的局部晚期NSCLC 78例,其中,ⅢA期45例,ⅢB期33例.处方剂量为PTV 50.4 ~64.0 Gy/28 ~33次,单次剂量为1.8~2.1 Gy;IGTV为60.0 ~ 74.3 Gy/28 ~ 33次,单次剂量为2.0~2.5 Gy.主要观察指标为总有效率(ORR)、局部控制率(LCR)、总生存率(OS)、无疾病进展生存率(PFS)及3级及以上食管和肺损伤.结果 78例患者均按计划完成根治性放疗,IGTV剂量≥60 Gy.67例(85.9%)患者接受以顺铂或卡铂为基础的第三代细胞毒药物两药联合方案化疗,其中17例(21.8%)为同步放化疗,50例(64.1%)为序贯放化疗.全组ORR为69.2%,其中CR 11例(14.1%),PR 43例(55.1%),SD 22例(28.2%),PD 2例(2.6%).截至2012年10月,失访6例,随访率92.3%.72例可随访患者中已死亡50例,22例存活.1、2、3年局部控制率分别为88.4%、54.7%、28.6%,中位PFS为15.3个月(2.3 ~46.8个月),中位OS为27.3个月(5.8 ~49.3个月).1、2、3年无进展生存率分别为50.7%、27.6%、21.1%;1、2、3年总生存率分别为87.5%、56.6%、30.3%.在同步放化疗与非同步放化疗亚组中,中位OS分别为32.8个月和24.1个月,1、2、3年总生存率分别为94.7%、73.7%、47.3%和83.0%、50.5%、23.9%(x2=3.946,P<0.05).全组共发生急性放射性食管损伤59例(75.6%),治疗相关性肺损伤(TRP)21例(26.9%),其中3级及以上放射性食管损伤19例(24.4%),3级及以上放射性肺损伤9例(11.5%).随访1年后,2例(2.6%)出现晚期3级肺损伤,食管无3级及以上晚期不良反应.结论 SIB-IMRT照射技术治疗局部晚期NSCLC疗效确切,安全性良好,值得临床进一步开展大样本前瞻性随机对照研究. Objective To evaluate the clinical efficacy and toxicity of simultaneously integrated boost intensity-modulated radiotherapy (SIB-IMRT) for patients with locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Methods Patients with NSCLC who received SIB-IMRT from January 2008 to June 2011 in our hospital were retrospeetively analyzed. Among the 78 patients, 45 patients had clinical stage IIIA disease, 33 patients III~ disease. The SIB-IMRT plans were designed to deliver 50.4 -64.0 Gy in 28 - 33 fraetions ( 1.8 - 2. 1 Gy/fraction) to PTV while simultaneously delivering 60. 0 - 74. 3 Gy in 28 - 33 fractions (2.0 - 2.5 Gy/fraction) to IGTV. The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS). The secondary endpoints were overall response rate (ORR), local control rate (LCR), progression-free survival (PFS) , adverse events (AEs). Results All patients completed definitive radiotherapy and 67 (85.9%) patients received platinum-based doublet ehemotherapy. Among them, 17 (21.8%) reeeivedconcurrent chemoradiation, other 50 ( 64.1% ) received sequential chemoradiation. The ORR was 69. 2% (54/78) , with CR 11(14.1% ) , PR 43(55.1% ) , SD 22(28.2% ) , PD 2(2. 6% ). The follow-up rate was 92.3%. Among 72 patients who were followed up, 50 were dead, 22 were alive. 1,2,3-year LCR were 88.4% ,54.7% ,28.6%. Median OS and PFS were 27.3 months (5.8 -49.3 months), 15.3 months (2.3-46.8 months),respectively. 1,2,3-year OS and PFS were 87.5%,50.7%,56.6%,27.6%, 30.3% and 21.1% , respectively. There was a statistically significant difference in OS between the sub- group arms with concurrent chemoradiation or non-concurrent chemoradiation (X2 = 3. 946, P 〈 O. 05 ). Nineteen (24. 4% ) patients experienced acute grade 3 esophagitis and 9 ( 11.5% ) experienced acute grade≥3 treatment-related pneumonitis (TRP). There were 2 (2. 6% ) late grade 3 pulmonary toxicity after 1 -year follow-up. No late grade ≥ 3 esophageal toxicity was observed. Conclusions It is safe and workable to use SIB-IMRT to treat patients with NSCLC. More prospective clinical studies are warranted.
出处 《中华放射医学与防护杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2013年第2期146-150,共5页 Chinese Journal of Radiological Medicine and Protection
关键词 非小细胞肺癌 同步加量调强放疗 总生存率 不良反应 Non-small cell lung cancer Integrated boost intensity-modulated radiotherapy Overall survival rate Adverse events
  • 相关文献

参考文献19

  • 1Curran WJ Jr, Paulus R, Langer CJ, et al. Sequential vs. concurrent chemoradiation for stage m non-small cell lung cancer: randomized phase m trial RTOG 9410.J Nat! Cancer Inst, 2011, 103 (19) : 1452-1460.
  • 2Belani CP, Choy H , Bonomi P, et al. Combined chemoradiotherapy regimens of paclitaxel and carboplatin for locally advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: a randomized phase n locally advanced multi-modality protocol.J Clin Oncol, 2005, 23 (25) :5883-5891.
  • 3Sause W, Kolesar P, Taylor S IV, et al. Final results of phase m trial in regionally advanced unresectable non-small cell lung cancer: Radiation Therapy Oncology Group, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group, and Southwest Oncology Group. Chest, 2000, 117(2) :358-364.
  • 4Kong FM, Ten HR, Schipper MJ, et al. High-dose radiation improved local tumor control and overall survival in patients with inoperable/unresectable non-small-cell lung cancer: long-term results of a radiation dose escalation study. IntJ Radiat Oncol Bioi Phys, 2005, 63(2) :324-333.
  • 5Wang L, Correa CR, Zhao L, et al. The effect of radiation dose and chemotherapy on overall survival in 237 patients with stage m non-small-cell lung cancer. IntJ Radiat Oncol Bioi Phys, 2009, 73 (5) : 1383-1390.
  • 6Liu HH, Wang X, Dong L, et al. Feasibility of sparing lung and other thoracic structures with intensity-modulated radiotherapy for non-small-cell lung cancer. IntJ Radiat Oncol Bioi Phys, 2004, 58(4) :1268-1279.
  • 7Grills IS, Yan D, Martinez AA, et al. Potential for reduced toxicity and dose escalation in the treatment of inoperable non-small-cell lung cancer: A comparison of intensity-modulated radiation therapy ( IMRT) ,3D conformal radiation, and elective nodal irradiation. IntJ Radiat Oncol Bioi Phys, 2003, 57 (3 ) : 875-890.
  • 8Schwarz M, Alber M, LebesqueJV, et al. Dose heterogeneity in the target volume and intensity-modulated radiotherapy to escalate the dose in the treatment of non-small-cell lung cancer. IntJ Radiat Oneol Bioi Phys, 2005, 62 ( 2) : 561-570.
  • 9Baumann M, Appold S, Petersen C, et al. Dose and fractionation concepts in the primary radiotherapy of non-small cell lung cancer. Lung Cancer, 2001, 33( Suppll) : S3545.
  • 10Arriagada R, Le Chevalier T, Quoix E, et al. ASTRO plenary: chemotherapy effect on locally advanced non -small cell lung carcinoma: a randomized study of 353 patients. IntJ Radiat Oncol Bioi Phys, 1991,20(6): 1183- 1190.

二级参考文献1

共引文献38

同被引文献159

引证文献16

二级引证文献155

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部