期刊文献+

双元技术创新与市场导向对企业绩效的影响研究:破坏性创新视角 被引量:30

An Empirical Study on the Effect of Ambidextrous Technological Innovation and Market Orientation on Firm Performance:Disruptive Innovation View
原文传递
导出
摘要 以破坏性创新理论为基础,探讨了双元技术创新和市场导向对企业绩效的影响,并重点研究了双元技术创新和市场导向两个不同维度之间的组合关系对企业绩效的影响。研究共提出了三组假设,以201家企业数据为基础对假设进行实证检验。研究结果表明:不同的技术创新和市场导向组合关系对企业绩效有着截然不同的影响。研究拓展了双元创新与企业绩效关系研究的视角,解释了双元创新与企业绩效关系研究的冲突,提出了中国企业实现创新路径突破的新思路。 In face of the intensified competition and accelerated pace of change, firms need to pursue exploratory innovation and exploitative innovation simultaneously, which is called ambidextrous innovation. As the ambidextrous innovation has been highlighted, much more remain unclear and to be further understood. First, there is little systematic research to distinguish the different effects of the technological factors and market factors of the innovation on finn performance. Second, no existing research has researched how the technological innovation and market orientation coordinate to influence a firm's performance to date. This paper, based on the theory of disrup- tive innovation, explores the effect of configuration of ambidextrous technological innovation and market orienta- tion on firm performance. Three groups of hypotheses are proposed. The findings, based on a database covering 201 firms in China, suggest that the effect of configuration of ambidextrous technological innovation and market orientation on firm performance is obvious. Different alignment of technological innovation and market orientation influences firm performance in different way. This research contributes to resolve the existing controversy on rela- tionships between ambidextrous innovation and firm performance by considering the technological factors and mar- ket factors simultaneously. Moreover, findings of this paper may provide new ways or guidelines for firms in Chi- na to pursue innovation breakthrough.
出处 《科学学与科学技术管理》 CSSCI 北大核心 2013年第6期140-151,共12页 Science of Science and Management of S.& T.
基金 国家自然科学基金项目(71072133 71102096 71032002) 新疆维吾尔自治区普通高等院校人文社科重点研究基地基金项目(010112A01)
关键词 双元创新 技术创新 市场导向 破坏性创新 ambidextrous innovation technological innovation market orientation disruptive innovation
  • 相关文献

参考文献38

  • 1Chesbrough H. The era of open innovation[J]. SloanManagement Review, 2003,44(3):35-41.
  • 2Jansen J P, Frans A J, Van Den Bosch H, Volberda W.Exploratory innovation, exploitative innovation, and per-formance: Effects of organizational antecedents and en-vironmental moderators [J]. Management Science, 2006,52(11):1661-1674.
  • 3李剑力.探索性创新、开发性创新与企业绩效关系研究——基于冗余资源调节效应的实证分析[J].科学学研究,2009,27(9):1418-1427. 被引量:79
  • 4Uotila J, Maula M, Keil T, et al. Exploration, exploita-tion, and financial performance: Analysis of S&P 500corporations[J]. Strategic Management Journal, 2009(30):221-231.
  • 5He Z L, Wong P K. Exploration vs. exploitation: Anempirical test of the ambidexterity hypothesis[J]. Organi-zation Science, 2004,15(4):481 -494.
  • 6Cao Q, Gedajlovic E,Zhang H. Unpacking organization-al ambidexterity: Dimensions, contingencies, and syner-gistic effects[J]. Organization Science, 2009,27(4):1-16.
  • 7Nerkar A. Old is gold. The value of temporal explora-tion in the creation of new knowledge[J]. ManagementScience, 2003,49(2):211-230.
  • 8Atuahene-Gima K, Murray J Y. Exploratory and exploit-ative learning in new product development; A social cap-ital perspective on new technology ventures in China[J].Journal of International Marketing, 2007,15(2): 1-29.
  • 9Christensen C M. The Innovator's Dilemma: When NewTechnologies Cause Great Firms to Fail[M]. Boston:Harvard Business School Press, 1997.
  • 10Christensen C M, Raynor M E. The Innovator's Solu-tion: Creating and Sustaining Successful GrowthfM].Boston: Harvard Business School Press, 2003.

二级参考文献63

  • 1方润生,李雄诒.组织冗余的利用对中国企业创新产出的影响[J].管理工程学报,2005,19(3):15-20. 被引量:49
  • 2Ozcan S. Examining slack - innovation relationship longitudinal evidence from US farm equipment industry( 1966 -2001 ) [ EB/OL]. Working paper: http://www, druid. dk/uploads/tx_pieturedb/ds2005 - 1497. pdf, 2005. 2007 - 12 - 07.
  • 3Rosner M. Economic determinants of organizational innovation[ J]. Administrative Science Quarterly, 1968, 12:614-625.
  • 4Murphy G B, Trailer J W, Hill R C. Measuring performance in entrepreneurship research [ J ]. Journal of Business Research, 1996, 36 : 17 - 29.
  • 5He Z L, Wong P K. Exploration vs. exploitation: an empirical test of the ambidexterity hypothesis [ J ]. Organization Science, 2004, 15:481 -494.
  • 6Cyert R, March J. The Behavioral Theory of the Firm [ M]. Englewood Cliffs (NJ) : Prentice - Hall; 1963.
  • 7Tan J, Peng M W. Organizational slack and firm performance during economic transitions: two studies from an emerging economy [ J]. Strategic Management Journal, 2003, 24: 1249- 1263.
  • 8Benner M J, Tushman M L. Exploitation, exploration, and process management: the productivity dilemma revisited[ J]. Academy of Management Review, 2003, 2 : 238 -256.
  • 9Isobe T, Makino S, Montgomery D B. Exploitation, exploration and firm performance: the case of small manufacturing firms in Japan[ EB/OL]. Working paper: https://mercury, smu. edu. sg/rsrchpubupload/4696/ 2804paper IMM. pdf , 2005. 2007 - 10 - 16.
  • 10March J G. Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning[ J]. Organization Science, 1991 , 2:71 - 87.

共引文献110

同被引文献469

引证文献30

二级引证文献238

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部