所有权结构对组织冗余与企业绩效的影响研究——基于委托人-委托人冲突视角被引量：4

A Study on the Impact of Ownership Structure on Organizational Slack——from a perspective of the principal-principal conflict

下载PDF

导出

摘要基于委托人-委托人冲突视角,研究了中国企业所有权结构对未吸收冗余与绩效关系的影响。以中国2009-2010年沪、深两市A股制造业上市公司为样本的实证分析结果表明:未吸收冗余与企业绩效呈倒U型关系,境内机构所有权和境外所有权对未吸收冗余与企业绩效关系的正向调节作用强于国有所有权,而个人所有权对未吸收冗余与企业绩效的关系没有显著的调节作用。 From the perspective of principal -principal conflict, we examine the influence of the ownership structure on the relationship between unabsorbed slack and firm performance. The empirical analysis was made with A - stock manufac- turing companies listed in the Shanghai and Shenzhen stock exchanges in China from 2009 to 2010 as an example. The re- sults suggest that there is an inverted U - shaped relationship between unabsorbed slack and finn performance and the posi- tive moderating effect of the domestic institutional ownership and foreign ownership on the relation between unabsorbed slack and firm performance is stronger than state ownership, while private ownership has no significant moderating effect.

作者赵洁

机构地区西安交通大学管理学院西安交通大学过程控制与效率工程教育部重点实验室

出处《西安交通大学学报（社会科学版）》 CSSCI 北大核心 2013年第3期46-51,共6页 Journal of Xi'an Jiaotong University：Social Sciences

基金国家自然科学基金重点项目(71132006) 国家自然科学基金青年项目(71102096) 教育部哲学社会科学研究重大课题攻关项目(09JZD0030)

关键词所有权结构代理理论组织冗余企业绩效 ownership structure agency theory organizational slack firm performance

分类号 F271 [经济管理—企业管理]

引文网络
相关文献

参考文献21

1DHARWADKAR R, GEORGE G, BRANDES P. Privatization in emerging economies : An agency theory perspective [ J ]. A- cademy of Management Review, 2000,25:650 - 669.
2KIM H, KIM H, LEE P M. Ownership structure and the rela- tionship between financial slack and R&D investments:Evi- dence from Korean firms[ J ]. Organization Science,2008,19 (3) :404 -418.
3CYERT R M, MARCH J D. A behavioral theory of the firm [ M ]. Englewood Cliffs, NJ : Prentice - Hall, 1963 : 18 - 26.
4JENSEN M, MECKLING W. Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior agency cost and ownership structure [ J ]. Journal of Financial Economics, 1976,3:305 - 360.
5BOURGEOIS L J. On the measurement of organizational slack [ J ]. Academy of Management Review, 1981,6 ( 1 ) : 29 - 39.
6SHARFMAN M P, WOLF G, CHASE R B, et al. Antecedents of organizational slack [ J ]. Academy of Management Review, 1988,13(4) :601 -614.
7TAN J, PENG M W. Organizational slaek and firm perform- ance during economie transitions:Two studies from an emer- ging economy [ J ]. Strategic Management Journal, 2003,24 ( 13 ) : 1249 - 1263.
8JU M, ZHAO H. Behind organizational slack and firm per- formance in China:The moderating roles of ownership and competitive intensity [ J ]. Asia Pacific Journal of Manage- ment,2009,26(4) :701 -717.
9SU Z, XIE E, LI Y. Organizational slaek and firm perform- ance during institutional transitions [ J ]. Asia Pacific Journal of Management,2009,26 ( 1 ) :75 -91.
10李文君,刘春林.经济危机环境下冗余资源与公司绩效的关系研究——基于行业竞争强度的调节作用[J].当代经济科学,2011,33(5):85-91. 被引量：15

二级参考文献125

1施浩,安同良,Ludovico Alcorta.论所有制与企业的R&D强度[J].现代管理科学,2005(11):12-13. 被引量：2
2靳涛.资本倚重、投资竞争与经济增长——中国转型期经济增长的再思索（1978～2004）[J].统计研究,2006,23(9):37-41. 被引量：23
3Bourgeois, III. L. On the Measurement of Organizational Slack[J]. Academy of Management Review,1981,6(1).
4Bromiley, P. Testing a Causal Model of Corporate Risk Taking and Performance [J]. Academy of Management Journal, 1991, (34).
5Cyert, R., and J. March. A Behavioral Theory of The Firm[M]. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall. 1963,.
6Jensen, M., and W. Meckling. Theory of The Firm: Managerial Behavior, Agency. Costs and Ownership Structure[J]. Journal of Financial Economics, 1976, 3(4).
7Ju, M., and H. Zhao. Behind Organizational Slack and Firm Performance in China: The Moderating Roles of Ownership and Competitive Intensity[J]. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 2009, 26(4).
8Nohria, N., and R. Gulati. Is Slack Good or Bad for hmovation[J]. Academy of Management Journal,1996,(39).
9North, D.C. Institutions, Institutional Change, and Economic Performance [M]. Cambridge, Ma: Harvard University Press, 1990.
10Peng, M.W., Heath, P.S. The Crowth of the Finn in Planned Economics in Transition:Institutions, Organizations, and Strategic Choice[J]. Academy of Management Review, 1996, (21/2).