期刊文献+

药品的管制价格与研发投入的均衡——基于新药研发成功不确定性的博弈论模型 被引量:4

Drug pricing regulation and research investment equilibrium: based on the uncertainty game theory model of new drugs research success
下载PDF
导出
摘要 政府对新药的限价过低将会抑制药品的研发投入,价格过高又必然会损害患者的效用。文章通过模型分析,认为在政府有能力对新药进行合理定价的情况下,存在政府定价与药品研发投入的纳什均衡。应用限价策略,不仅能为政府审查药品的价格提供参考、能为政府对新药限价提供依据,而且有助于保证药企研发投入的合理水平。 The government limit too low on new drugs price will curb investment in research and development of drugs, and too high price will inevitably damage the effectiveness of the patients. The model analysis that, if the government has the capable to make reasonable price of new drug, then there has the investment Nash equilibrium between government pricing and drug research and development. Application the drug price limit strategy, not only make reference for the government to review the price of drugs, but also provide a reference for the Government to limit new drugs price, and helps to ensure a reasonable level of investment in new drug research and development of pharmaceutical companies.
机构地区 上海交通大学
出处 《卫生经济研究》 2013年第6期34-37,共4页
基金 国家自然科学基金(71273175) 上海市公共卫生重点学科建设项目(12GWZX0601)
关键词 药品研发投入 政府限价 纳什均衡 pharmaceutical research and development investment government price Nash equilibrium
  • 相关文献

参考文献11

  • 1Henry D, Lexchin J. The Pharmaceutical in- dustry as a medicines Provider [J]. Medicines society,and industry III, 2002, 360: 1590-1595.
  • 2Danzon P. Making sense of Drug prices [J]. Regulation, 2000, 23(1): 56-63.
  • 3Vernon J A. Examining the link between price regulation and pharmaceutical R&D investment [J]. Health Economics, 2005, 14:1-16.
  • 4Manasse H R. Medication use in an imperfect world: drug misadventuring as an issue of public policy. American Journal of Health-System Pharmacy, 1988, 46: 929-944.
  • 5Jolicoeur L M, Jones-Grizzle A J, boyer J G. Guidelines for Performing a Pharmacoeconomic Analy- sis[J]. American Journal of Health-system Pharmacy, 1992, 49(7): 1741-1747.
  • 6Freund D A, Dittus R S. Principles of Phar- macoeconomic Analysis of Drug Therapy [J]. Pharma- coeconomics, 1992, 1(1): 20-31.
  • 7Hill S R, Mitchell A S, Henry D A. Problems with the Interpretation of Pharmacoecono- mic Analyses: A Review of Submissions to the Australian Pharmaceu- tical Benefits Scheme [J]. Medical Association, 2000, The Journal of the American 283(16):2116-2121.
  • 8孙利华,郭朗.对我国药品定价引入经济性指标的思考[J].中国药房,2012,23(24):2213-2215. 被引量:4
  • 9Brekke K R, Nuscheler R, Straume O R. Quality and location choices under price regulation[J]. Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, 2006, 15:207 - 227.
  • 10Sanjo Y. Hotelling's location model with quality choice in mixed duopoly[J]. Economics Bulletin, 2007, 18(2): 1-10.

二级参考文献3

共引文献3

同被引文献50

  • 1马维胜.医疗改革的核心问题和未来出路[J].中国工业经济,2006(4):14-22. 被引量:39
  • 2陈宪.我国药品定价对新药研发的影响研究[D].沈阳药科大学,2008.
  • 3韩锋.我国药品政府定价对制药企业的影响及建议[D].沈阳药科大学,2009.40-45.
  • 4Nature reviews Drug discovery 2011, 10, 328-329.
  • 5Danzon P. Making sense of drug prices[J]. Regulation, 2000, 23(1): 56-63.
  • 6Vernon J. Examining the link between price regulation and pharmaceutical R&D investment [J]. Health Economics, 2005, 14:1-16.
  • 7Vernon JA, drug research and price controls [J]. Regulation, 2003 a, 25(4): 22-25.
  • 8"成本定价法"制约新药研发[N].嘹望新闻周刊,2003,8月25日.34:21.
  • 9Brekke K R, Nuscheler R, Straume O R. Quality and location choices under price regulation[J]. Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, 2006, 15:207 - 227.
  • 10Sanjo Y. Hotelling's location model with quality choice in mixed duopoly[J]. Economics Bulletin, 2007, 18(2): 1-10.

引证文献4

二级引证文献4

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部