我国有关精神利益保护的立法和理论评析

Review on Related Legislation and Theory about Protecting Mental Interests

残疾、死亡赔偿金与精神抚慰金的概念分野面临着效应价值和规范技术上的质问。在我国民法典之民事责任法设计中,理应对在违约场合中不能借助侵权责任法加以实现的某些精神损害救济留出应有的通道。我国国家实定法对主体精神利益的保护总体持谨慎态度,司法实践中存在着主体精神利益保护需求与救济制度供给不足的矛盾;有关主体精神利益保护的现行制度框架存在内在体系与外在体系的双重冲突。

It must answer questions of effect values and norms technology to ddistinguish ＂disability compensation＂,＂death compensation＂ from ＂spiritual solatium＂.While designing the law on civil liability of our Civil Code,we should keep the channel to relieve some mental damages in breach of contract,which can not be achieved in the Tort Liability Act.On institutional level,our laws take a cautious attitude on overall protection of mental interests,the contradiction between necessities for protecting person＇s spiritual interests and inadequate supply of relief institutions lies in China＇s judicial practice,and our relief institutions for people＇s mental interests are facing a double conflict in internal and external system.