期刊文献+

驾驶员车头时距研究 被引量:19

A Study on Drivers' Time Headway
原文传递
导出
摘要 车头时距是评价驾驶员驾驶安全性的重要指标。本研究针对驾驶员在驾驶中保持的车头时距提出了一种新的理论框架,将车辆跟驰状态分成两类:强跟驰和弱跟驰。处于强跟驰状态时,驾驶员保持最短车头时距;处于弱跟驰状态时,驾驶员保持舒适车头时距,即在最短车头时距的基础上预留出一定的心理裕量。根据大量车头时距的实测数据,本研究对理论框架的有效性进行验证。结果表明,本研究提出的理论框架能够较好地解释车头时距的实测数据,最短车头时距和舒适车头时距分别满足以1.55秒和2.60秒为均值,以0.48秒和1.13秒为标准差的正态分布,而车头时距的实测数据可以由这两个正态分布的混合分布来拟合。 Time headway is an important indicator of driving safety. The present study proposed a new theoretical framework about drivers ~ time headway choice, which divided car following status into two categories: strong car-following and weak car-following. In strong car- following status, drivers preferred to keep minimum time headway when driving; in weak car- following,drivers tended to keep comfortable time headway,adding a psychological margin on the basis of minimum time headway. Based on a mass of observational data of time headway, the new theoretical framework was verified. Results showed that this framework could explain the observational data of time headway well. The minimum time headway had a normal distribution with a mean of 1.55s and standard deviation of 0.48s,while the comfortable time headway had a normal distribution with a mean of 2. 60s and standard deviation of 1. 13s, and the mixed distribution of these two normal distributions could fit these observational data well.
出处 《工业工程与管理》 CSSCI 北大核心 2013年第2期131-135,140,共6页 Industrial Engineering and Management
基金 富士康擢才创研基金资助项目(11F81210003)
关键词 车辆跟驰 车头时距 最短车头时距 舒适车头时距 实测数据 car following time headway minimum time headway comfortable timeheadway empirical data
  • 相关文献

参考文献15

  • 1Fairclough S H, May AJ, Carter C. The effect of time headway feedback on following behaviour[J]. Accident Analysis &. Prevention, 1997 ,29 (3) : 387-397.
  • 2Shinar D, Schechtman E. Headway feedback improves intervehicular distance: A field study[J]. Human Factors, 2002,44(3) :474-481.
  • 3Lewis-Evans B, Waard D D, Brookhuis K A. That's close enough-A threshold effect of time headway on the experience of risk, task difficulty, effort, and comfort[J]. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 2010.42(6) ,1926-1933.
  • 4Dingus T Av Iahns S K. Horowitz A D. Knipling R Human factors design issues for crash avoidance systems[CJ. In W. Barfield & T. A. Dingus Ceds, ). Human factors in intelligent transportation systems. Mahwah. NJ, Erlbaurn, 55-94.
  • 5Vogel K. A comparison of headway and time to collision as safety indicators[J]. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 2003,35 (3) ,427-433.
  • 6Taieb-Maimon M. Learning headway estimation in driving]]]. Human Factors. 2007 .49(4),734-744.
  • 7Taieb-Maimon MvShinar D. Minimum and comfortable driving headways, Reality versus perception[J]. Human Factors, 2001. 43(1),159-172.
  • 8Winsum W V. Heino A. Choice of time-headway in car?following and the role of time-ta-collision information in braking[J]. Ergonomics. 1996 ? 39(4) ,579-592.
  • 9Ohta H. Distance headway behavior between vehicles from the viewpoint ot proxemicsl] J. lAT Kesearch.1994 .IS, 6-14.
  • 10Wilde GJ S. Risk homeostasis theory, an overview[J]. Injury Prevention, 1998,4(2) : 89-9l.

同被引文献138

引证文献19

二级引证文献77

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部