期刊文献+

论类书的流弊及其学术价值

Research on the Abuse and Academic Value of Leishu
下载PDF
导出
摘要 类书是古人读书治学的万宝全书,但类书与文学、科举结合一旦太过,或者是读书人为了功名利禄而滥用类书,类书必然走向僵化,成为"獭祭"、"饾饤"、"剽窃"、"腐烂"之书而被有识之士口诛笔伐;读书人的急功近利、投机取巧使类书流弊日甚,但类书的生命力却是顽强的,存在的重要性也是无可替代的,这就是千百年来类书绵延不绝的主要原因。 "Leishu" had a great influence on ancient Chinese people,which was an important tool for study and scholarly research.If"Leishu" was combined too closely with Literature and Imperial Examination or readers abused"Leishu" to pursue fame and fortune,"Leishu" inevitably moved towards fossilization and became "taji","douding","plagiarism" or "vulgar" book which led to serious criticism by people of knowledge.The thought of seeking quick success and gambling psychology of readers made its drawback worse day by day.However,the vitality of"Leishu" was tenacious and the importance of the presence was irreplaceable,which was the main reason for its long term existence.
作者 刘全波
出处 《北京理工大学学报(社会科学版)》 CSSCI 2013年第3期133-139,共7页 Journal of Beijing Institute of Technology:Social Sciences Edition
基金 教育部人文社会科学研究基金资助项目(11YJC870016) 全国高等院校古籍整理研究工作委员会资助项目(1225) 兰州大学中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金资助项目(13LZUJBWZY036)
关键词 类书 流弊 文学 科举 学术价值 Leishu abuse literature imperial examination academic value
  • 相关文献

参考文献26

二级参考文献19

  • 1白化文.敦煌遗书中的类书简述[J].中国典籍与文化,1999(4):50-59. 被引量:15
  • 2王钦若等.册府元龟[M].南京:凤凰出版社,2006.
  • 3杜公瞻.文渊阁四库全书:编珠[M].上海:上海古籍出版社,2003.
  • 4马端临.文献通考[M].台北:新兴书局,1960.
  • 5刘师培.敦煌新出唐写本提要[M]∥郑学檬、郑炳林.中国敦煌学百年文库:文献卷:(一).兰州:甘肃文化出版社,1999.
  • 6罗振玉.鸣沙石室古籍丛残[M]∥罗雪堂.罗雪堂先生全集三编.台北:台湾大通书局,1968.
  • 7王三庆.敦煌古类书《语对》研究[M].台北:文史哲出版社,1985.
  • 8脱脱 等.宋史[M].北京:中华书局,1985.14029.
  • 9刘昫.旧唐书[M].北京:中华书局,1975..
  • 10陈振孙 徐小蛮 顾美华点校.直斋书录解题[M].上海:上海古籍出版社,1987..

共引文献1945

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部