期刊文献+

变点CAViaR市场风险测量模型及创业板应用 被引量:2

The change point CAViaR model for measuring market risk with an application to Growth Enterprise Market
原文传递
导出
摘要 提出了带有结构变点的条件分位数自回归模型,借助于不对称拉普拉斯分布,给出了基于贝叶斯推理和马尔科夫链蒙特卡罗模拟抽样的参数估计方法.通过(无、单、双)变点间接GARCH方程(IG)模型与对称绝对值方程(SAV)模型的比较以及风险值预测效果统计检验,发现单变点SAV模型是预测我国创业板指数市场风险的最优模型,且变点的估计均值紧邻首次限售解禁日期;证实了首次限售股解禁引起的原始股大量减持和频繁的高管离职是市场风险演化模式结构变化的主要成因,且变点后的市场风险平均水平以及滞后消息对风险的冲击强度均低于变点前的水平,因此必须加强对高管减持行为的监管,以保护中小投资者利益. This paper proposed a new conditional autoregressive value at risk by regression quantiles model with structural change points.Bayesian inference and Markov chain Monte Carlo simulation was applied to estimate parameters based on asymmetric Laplace distribution.Comparing the IG and SAV models both with no,one or two change points as well as statistically testing the forecasting effect of value at risk,it found that SAV model with one change point was the optimal one to forecast the market risk of China's Growth Enterprise Market,and the estimated change point in one-change-point SAV model was close to the first unlocking day of restricted shares.It verified that the dramatically reduction of original share and the senor executives' dismission drove by the first unlocking of large restricted shares were two main causes to result in structural change of risk evolution patterns,and the average VaRs and lagged returns' impact to the current VaR after the change point were both weaker than the ones before the change point.Therefore,it is necessary to strengthen the supervision of executives' reduced holding in order to protect small investors' interests.
出处 《中国矿业大学学报》 EI CAS CSCD 北大核心 2013年第3期506-512,共7页 Journal of China University of Mining & Technology
基金 国家自然科学基金项目(71071153) 教育部新世纪优秀人才支持计划项目(NCET-12-0955) 江苏省333高层次人才培养工程专项项目
关键词 变点 CAVIAR 市场风险 限售解禁 创业板 change point CAViaR market risk restricted shares unlocking Growth Enterprise Market
  • 相关文献

参考文献12

  • 1ENGLE R F, MANGANELLI S. Caviar Conditional autoregressive value at risk, by regression quantiles [J]. Journal of Business Economic Statistics,2004, 22 (4): 367-381.
  • 2JEON J,TAYLOR J W. Using CAViaR models with implied volatility for value-at-risk estimation[J/OL]. Journal of Forecasting. online: 2011-10-27. doi.. 10. lO02/for. 1251. http ://onlinelibrary. wiley, com/doi/ 10. 1002/for. 1251/fu11.
  • 3HUANG Da-shan, YU Bai-min, FRANK J F, et al. CAViaR-based forecast for oil price risk[J]. Energy Economics,2009,31 (4) :511-518.
  • 4刘新华,黄大山.中国股市风险CAViaR方法的稳定性分析及其时变建模[J].系统工程理论与实践,2005,25(3):1-6. 被引量:8
  • 5闫昌荣.基于流动性调整CAViaR模型的风险度量方法[J].数量经济技术经济研究,2012,29(3):151-160. 被引量:11
  • 6BAI J, PERRON P. Estimating and testing linearmodels with multiple structural changes[J]. Econo- metrica,1998,66(1) :47-78.
  • 7BAI J, PERRON P. Computation and analysis of mul- tiple structural change models[J]. Journal of Applied Econometrics, 2003,18(1) : 1-22.
  • 8BARRY D, HARTIGAN J A. A Bayesian analysis for change point problems[J]. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 1993,88(421) : 309-319.
  • 9王新宇,宋学锋.间接TARCH-CAViaR模型及其MCMC参数估计与应用[J].系统工程理论与实践,2008,28(9):46-51. 被引量:21
  • 10YU K, ZHANG J. A three-parameter asymmetric Laplace distribution and its extension[J].Communi- cations in Statistics Theory and Methods, 2005,34 (9/10) : 1867-1879.

二级参考文献49

  • 1Acerbi C. , and Tasche D. , 2002, On the Coherence of Expected Shortfall [J], Journal of Bank- ing and Finance, 26, 1478-1503.
  • 2Amihud Y., 2002, Illiquidity and Stock Returns: Cross-section and Time-series Effects [J], Journal of Financial Market, 5, 31-56.
  • 3AmihudY. , and Mendelson H., 1998, Liquidity, Volatility, and ExchangeAutomation [J], Journal of Accounting, Auditing, and Finance, 3 (4), 369-395.
  • 4Angelidis T. , and P, enos, 2006, Liquidity Adjusted Value-at-risk Based on the Components of the Bid-ask Spread [J], Applied Financial Economics, 16 (11), 835-851.
  • 5Artzner P. , Freddy D. , Eber J. , and David H. , 1999, Coherent Measures o fRisks [J], Math-ematical Finance, 9, 203-228.
  • 6Bangia A., Francis X.D., Til S., and Stroughair J. D., 1998, Modeling LiquidityRisk, with Implications for Traditional Market Risk Measurement and Management [R], Center for Financial Institu- tions Working Paper, University of Penneylvania.
  • 7Cosandy D. , 2001, Adjusting Value at Risk for Market Liquidity [J], Risk, 10, 115-118.
  • 8Doubofsky D. A. , and Groth J. C. , 1984, Exchange Listing and Stock Liquidity [J], Journal of Financial Research, 7 (4) 291-303.
  • 9Engle R. F. , and Ferstenberg R. , 2007, Execution Risk : It's the Same as Investment Risk [J], Journal of Portfolio Management, 33 (2), 34-44.
  • 10Engle R. F. , and Manganelli S. , 2004, CAViaR.. Conditional Autoregressive Value at Risk by Regression Quantile [J], Journal of Business and Economic Statistics, 22, 367-381.

共引文献29

同被引文献13

引证文献2

二级引证文献5

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部