期刊文献+

市场结构、市场绩效与企业的创新行为——基于中国工业企业层面的面板数据分析 被引量:64

Market Structure,Market Performance and Innovation Behavior——Based on the Panel Date of China’s Industrial Firms
下载PDF
导出
摘要 本文基于新产业组织学中SCP分析范式,采用2004~2007年中国规模以上工业统计数据库,利用Tobit模型对影响企业研发强度的因素进行了实证分析。结果发现,企业规模和市场集中度与研发强度之间存在显著的倒U型关系,这意味着在一定范围内,规模的增长和竞争的加剧是有利于创新的。从企业产权特征来看,与其他所有制相比,股份制和有限责任制企业的创新投入激励要更大些,而国有企业和私人企业则无明显差异。此外,企业的市场份额越大,其研发积极性也更高,这表明研发具有一定的规模经济。除了市场结构对创新投入影响外,市场绩效也影响着企业的研发强度,其中,企业的利润积累能促进研发支出,且研发支出也随新产品产值比重的提高而增加。最后,基于上述研究结论,本文就如何鼓励企业创新提出了一些政策建议。 Following the SCP framework and using firm-level data of China's large and medium-size industrial firms from 2004 to 2007, this paper aims to empirically explore how market structure and performance affect R&D density. Since R&D investment is truncated, we use Tobit model for econometric estimation. We find that R & O density has a significantly invert- ed U-shaped relationship with firm size and market concentration. This implies that within a certain range, increasing firm scale or competition will encourage R & D activities. Ownership is also an important factor. While the dummies for joint-stock and limited-liability companies have a significant positive contribution to R&D investment, the effects for state-owned and pri- vate enterprises are not significant. Our analysis indicates R&D scale economy since the firms with larger market share have stronger R&D incentives. Besides market structure, market performance also affects R & D density, for example, either the accumulation of profits or the increase of output value ratio of new products will promote R & D expenditure.
作者 寇宗来 高琼
出处 《产业经济研究》 CSSCI 北大核心 2013年第3期1-11,110,共12页 Industrial Economics Research
基金 复旦大学985三期项目(项目编号:2012SHKXQN005) "卓学计划" 上海社科项目(项目编号:2010BJL003) 国家社科重大项目(项目编号:11&ZD073)的科研资助
关键词 研发支出 市场结构 市场绩效 企业规模 市场集中度 R&D expenditure market structure market performance firm scale market concentration ratio
  • 相关文献

参考文献38

  • 1Arrow, Kenneth J. , 1962, Economic Welfare and the Allocation of Resources for Invention, in Richad R. Nelson (ed.). The Rate and Direction of Inventive Activity, Princeton: Princeton University Press,609---626.
  • 2Gilbert R J, Newbery D M G. , 1952, "Preemptive patenting and the persistence of monopoly", The American Economic Re- view,72:514--526.
  • 3Scherer F M. ,1967, "Research and development resource allocation under rivalry", The Quarterly Journal of Economics ,81 (3) :359--394.
  • 4Mansfield E. , 1968, Industrial research and technological innovation: An econometric analysis, New York: Norton.
  • 5Kamien M I, Schwartz N L. , 1982, Market structure and innovation, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • 6Horowitz I. , 1962, "Firm size and research activity", Southern Economic Journal,28 ( 1 ) :298--301.
  • 7Hamberg D. ,1964, "Size of finn, oligopoly, and research: The evidence", Canadian Journal of Economics and Political Science ,30:62--75.
  • 8Comanor W S. , 1967, "Market structure, product differentiation, and industrial research", The Quarterly Journal of Eco- nom/cs ,81 (4) :639---657.
  • 9Geroski P A, Geroski. , 1994, Market structure, corporate performance and innovative activity, Oxford: Clarendon Press.
  • 10Nickell S J. , 1996, "Competition and corporate performance", Journal of political economy, 104:724--746.

二级参考文献163

共引文献2562

同被引文献1199

引证文献64

二级引证文献776

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部