期刊文献+

成都龙泉驿区制鞋业工人健康干预效果评价 被引量:2

Effectiveness of Health Education and Promotion Among Shoe-making Workers in Longquanyi District,Chengdu
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的通过制鞋业职业病防治健康干预效果的变化,为进一步提高该行业健康干预有效性提供依据。方法2009-04,整群随机选择龙泉驿区22家制鞋业413名职工以及作业场所作为研究对象,根据职业卫生知识知晓调查情况,健康行为定期检查结果,企业监测和监护水平,3年后总结干预效果。结果作业工人职业卫生知识知晓率干预前后分别为22.7%和65.3%、卫生行为形成率干预前后分别为27.4%和73.0%、工作场所三苯(苯、甲苯、二甲苯)监测合格率干预前后分别为37.9%和85.2%,均有统计学意义(χ2=913.2,1 030.6,125.0,P<0.05);职工体检合格率干预前后分别为90.5%和91.0%,无统计学意义(χ2=0.35,P>0.05)。结论对龙泉驿区制鞋业进行职业病防治健康干预活动后,工人的职业病防治知识有了提高,作业环境职业危害合格率及作业者体检合格率均得到改善。 Objective To evaluate the effect of health intervention in shoe - making enterprises, and to provide basis for enhancing the intervention validity of occupational diseases. Methods Totally 413 workers from 22 shoe - making enterprises were randomly sampled in Longquanyi district in April, 2009. Results The awareness rate of occupational health knowledge increased from 22. 7% to 65.3% ; the formation rate of health behaviors increased from 27.4% to 73.0% ; the qualified rate of levels of benzene, toluene and xylene in the workplaces increased from 37.9% to 85.2%, with statistical difference (X^2 = 913.2, 1 030. 6, 125.0 respectively; P 〈 0. 05) ; the physical examination qualified rate remained stable level, with no significant difference ( X^2 = 0. 35, P 〉 0. 05 ) before and after intervention. Conclusion After 3 years of behavioral intervention, the worker's occupational disease prevention knowledge, the level of occupational hazards qualified rate and physi- cal examination qualified rate of workers have improved effectively.
出处 《预防医学情报杂志》 CAS 2013年第5期397-400,共4页 Journal of Preventive Medicine Information
基金 四川省卫生厅立项课题(项目编号:100068)
关键词 “三苯” 制鞋业 健康教育 健康促进 评价 benzene toluene xylene shoe - making enterprises health education health promotion
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

二级参考文献9

共引文献37

同被引文献42

  • 1李建莹,郭萍,陈宝琴,秦天选,迟恒斌,刘春安.西安华山机械工业有限公司健康促进试点工程效果评价[J].中国健康教育,2004,20(10):937-939. 被引量:2
  • 2成玉萍,王海青,李枫.职业健康促进研究进展[J].江苏预防医学,2005,16(2):82-84. 被引量:13
  • 3柏品清,朱美芬,樊海军.铅作业工人健康促进及效果分析[J].工业卫生与职业病,2006,32(1):39-41. 被引量:15
  • 4WHO.Declaration on occupational health for all Beijing. [EB/OL]. [ 2014 - 11 - 19 ] http ://www.who.int/occupational_heahh/Publica- tions / declaration/en/.
  • 5Chew L,Cheah C ,Koh YH.Heahh promotion programme in the private workplaces in Singapore:a prevalence survey [J]. Singapore Med J, 2002,43( 1 ) : 18-24.
  • 6Mills PR, Kessler RC, Cooper J, et al.lmpact of a health promotion pro- gram on employee health risks and work productivity [J]. Am Health Promotion, 2007,22( 1 ) :45-53.
  • 7O'DonnellMP.工作场所健康促进[M].常春,等译.北京:化学工业出版社,2009,95-133.
  • 8Martin A, Sanderson K, Cocker F.Meta-analysis of the effects of health promotion intervention on the workplace on depression and anx- iety symptoms[J ].Scand J Work Environ Health, 2009,35( 1 ) : 7-18.
  • 9Briner R, Reynolds S. The costs, benefits, and limitations of organi- sational level stress interventions [J]. J Organ Behav, 1999,20 (5): 647-665.
  • 10Campbell MK, Tessaro I, DeVellis B, et al. Effects of a tailored health promotion program for female blue-collar workers: health works for women[ J ]. Prev Med, 2002,34(3 ) : 313-323.

引证文献2

二级引证文献6

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部