期刊文献+

创新能力与客户资源配置决策对企业绩效的影响 被引量:2

Effects of Innovation Ability and Customer Resources Configuration Decisions on Firm Performance
下载PDF
导出
摘要 基于资源基础理论和配置理论,从创新能力与客户资源相互配置影响企业绩效的视角入手,提出了4种不同的创新能力与客户资源配置决策。利用2006-2011年我国信息技术业A股上市公司面板数据,对创新能力与客户资源配置决策对企业绩效的影响进行了实证研究。结果表明:深度客户-广度创新配置决策对企业绩效具有显著的正向影响,对绩效波动的负向影响不显著;深度创新-广度客户配置决策对企业绩效具有显著的正向影响,对绩效波动具有显著的负向影响;资源多样化配置决策对企业绩效和绩效波动均有显著的负向影响;而资源集中配置决策对企业绩效和绩效波动的正向影响均不显著。 Based on the resource based theory and configuration theory, starting from the perspective of innovative abilityand customer resources both affect firm performance, forming four different innovation ability and customer resources con- figuration decisions. Using panel data of A share listed companies of China's IT industry in 2006--2011, we conduct an empirical study about the effects of innovation ability and customer resources configuration decisions on firm performance and performance variability. Empirical results indicate that deep customer--broad innovation configuration decision has significant positive impact on performance, but the negative impact on performance variability is not significant~ Deep in- novation broad customer configuration decision has significant positive impact on performance and negative impact on per- formance variability; Resources diversification configuration decision has significant negative impact on performance and performance variability; Resources concentration configuration decision has positive impact on performance and perform- ance variability, but both are not significant.
作者 陈收 张锦
出处 《科技进步与对策》 CSSCI 北大核心 2013年第10期68-75,共8页 Science & Technology Progress and Policy
基金 国家自然科学基金重点项目(71031004) 国家自然科学基金创新研究群体项目(71221001) 教育部创新研究群体项目(IRT0916) 湖南省创新群体项目(09JJT02)
关键词 创新能力 客户资源 配置决策 企业绩效 绩效波动 Innovation Ability Customer Resources Configuration Decision Firm Performance Performance Variability
  • 相关文献

参考文献22

  • 1BARNEYJ B. Firm resources and sustained competitive ad?vantage[J].Journal of Management, 1991, 17( 1): 99-120.
  • 2PETERAF M A. The theory of the growth of the firm (o?riginally published 1959)[M]. Oxford: Oxford University press, 1993.
  • 3MILLER D, SHAMISI[J. The resource-based view of the firm in two environments: the hol leywood firm studios frorr 1936 to 1965[J]. Academy of Manage-nu-ntJournal. 1996. 39(3) :519-543.
  • 4BARNEYJ B. Resource-based theories of competitive ad?vantage: a ten-year retrospective on the resource-based view[J].Journal of Management, 2001, 27(6) :643-650.
  • 5CROOK T R, KETCHEN DJ, COMBSJ G, et a1. Strate?gic resources and performance: a mctn-annlysis]]]. Strategic ManagementJournal, 2008 ,29(11) :1141-1154.
  • 6SRIVASTAVA R K, SHERVANI T A, FAHEY L. Mar?ket-based assets and shareholder value: a framework for a nalysis[J].Journal of Marketing, 1998, 620): 2-18.
  • 7TERZIOVSKI M. Innovation practice and its performance implications in small and medium enterprises (SMEs) in the manufacturing sector: a resource-based view UJ. Strategic ManagementJournal, 2010, 31(8): 892-902.
  • 8官建成,史晓敏.技术创新能力和创新绩效关系研究[J].中国机械工程,2004,15(11):1000-1004. 被引量:93
  • 9ZOTT C. Dynamic capabilities and the emergence of intrain?dustry differential firm performance: insights from a simu?lation study[J]. Strategic ManagementJournal, 2003, 24 (2): 97-125.
  • 10SIRMON D G, HITT M A. Contingencies within dynamic managerial capabilities: interdependent effects of resource investment and deployment on firm performance[J]. Stra?tegic ManagementJournal, 2009, 30(3): 1375-1394.

二级参考文献12

  • 1Guan Jiancheng. Comparison Study on Industrial Innovation between China and Some European Countries. Production and Inventory Management Journal, 2002, 43(3/4):30-46
  • 2Barney J B. Organizational Culture: Can It Be a Source of Sustainable Competitive Advantage. Academy of Management Review, 1986, 11: 656-65
  • 3Christensen J F. Asset Profiles for Technological Innovation. Research Policy, 1995, 24: 727-45
  • 4Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development. Proposed Guidelines for Collecting and Integrating Technological Innovation Data, OSLO Manual.Paris: OECD,1996
  • 5Burgelman R, Maidique M A, Wheelwright S C. Strategic Management of Technology and Innovation. New York: Mc Graw-Hill Inc, 1996
  • 6Chiesa V, Coughlan P, Voss C A. Development of a Technical Innovation Audit. IEEE Engineering Management Review, 1998, 26(2): 64-91
  • 7Dess G. Consensus in the Strategy Formulation and Organizational Performance: Competitors in a Fragmented Industry. Strategy Management Journal, 1987, 8(3):259-277
  • 8Powell T C, Micallef A N. Information Technology as Competitive Advantage: the Role of Human, Business, and Technology Resources. Strategy Management Journal, 1997, 18(5): 375-405
  • 9van de Ven A, Ferry D. Measuring and Assessing Organizations. New York: Wiley, 1979
  • 10Amit R, Schoemaker P J H. Strategic Assets and Organizational Rent. Strategic Management Journal, 1993,14:33-46

共引文献92

同被引文献26

引证文献2

二级引证文献9

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部